Comparison
langflow vs Magick
Verdict
Pick langflow if langflow is a Python-based tool for building and deploying AI workflows using large language models and agent systems; pick Magick if magick is a TypeScript-based toolkit focused on the development and fine-tuning of AI agents with integrations for large language models and support for no-code visual scripting.
Markdown twin · langflow alternatives · Magick alternatives
GraphCanon updated 2d
vs
Trust & integrity
| Signal | langflow | Magick |
|---|---|---|
| Maintenance | Very active (0d since push) As of 3w · github_public_v1 | Dormant (423d since push) As of 2d · github_public_v1 |
| Provenance | Not a fork · Organization account As of 3w · github_public_v1 | Not a fork · Organization account As of 2d · github_public_v1 |
| OSV dependency advisories | No published findings from this source as of 2026-07-11 As of 1mo · osv@v1 | No lockfile (source not queried) As of 1mo · osv@v1 |
| deps.dev advisories | Not queried deps.dev@v1 | Not queried deps.dev@v1 |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | Not queried openssf-scorecard@v1 | Not queried openssf-scorecard@v1 |
Tagline
- langflow
- Tool for building and deploying AI-powered agents and workflows
- Magick
- Cutting-edge toolkit for AI builders
Stars
- langflow
- 153k
- Magick
- 847
Forks
- langflow
- 9.7k
- Magick
- 140
Open issues
- langflow
- 972
- Magick
- 32
Language
- langflow
- Python
- Magick
- TypeScript
Adopt for
- langflow
- Langflow is a Python-based tool for building and deploying AI workflows using large language models and agent systems.
- Magick
- Magick is a TypeScript-based toolkit focused on the development and fine-tuning of AI agents with integrations for large language models and support for no-code visual scripting.
Persona
- langflow
- -
- Magick
- -
Runtime
- langflow
- -
- Magick
- -
License
- langflow
- MIT
- Magick
- Magick operates under a license that differs from typical open-source licenses. Users need to verify compatibility with their projects' licensing needs.
Last pushed
- langflow
- Aug 2, 2026
- Magick
- Jun 24, 2025
Categories
- langflow
- AI Agents, Model Training
- Magick
- AI Agents, Evaluation & Observability, LLM Frameworks, Model Training
Trust and health
Maintenance
- langflow
- Very active (96%)
- Magick
- Dormant (18%)
Days since push
- langflow
- 0d
- Magick
- 423d
Open issues (now)
- langflow
- 972
- Magick
- 32
Stars delta
- langflow
- Unknown
- Magick
- +5 (30d)
Open issues delta
- langflow
- Unknown
- Magick
- 0 (30d)
OSV dependency advisories
- langflow
- No published findings from this source as of 2026-07-11
- Magick
- No lockfile (source not queried)
Full report
- langflow
- Trust report
- Magick
- Trust report
Choose langflow if…
- langflow is primarily Python; Magick is TypeScript.
- License: langflow is MIT, Magick is Other.
- Pricing: Open-source under MIT license with community and commercial options available; the OSS version is free to use at your own risk..
- Requirements: Min 4 GB RAM; Requires Docker; Requires Python 3.10–3.14, the recommended uv package manager is beneficial but not explicitly required for installation.; Docker can be used to start a Langflow container with default settings..
- Tags unique to langflow: agents, chatgpt, generative-ai, large language models.
- Use Langflow if you are working with Python versions from 3.10 to 3.14, as these versions are specifically supported for seamless operation of the tool.
When NOT to use langflow
- Do not use Langflow if your Python environment does not align with version constraints between 3.10 and 3.14.
- Langflow may not be the best fit if you are seeking a platform that operates without any language model integration, as it fundamentally relies on such models for its functionality.
Choose Magick if…
- Magick is primarily TypeScript; langflow is Python.
- License: Magick is Other, langflow is MIT.
- Pricing: No explicit pricing details provided in the repository data, indicating a trial or enterprise model potentially requiring direct inquiries for specific terms..
- Tags unique to Magick: agent, agi, ai, blueprints-visual-scripting.
- Also covers Evaluation & Observability, LLM Frameworks.
- - You are building AI agents or virtual assistants using large language models like Gemini, GPT-3, or GPT-4 that require visual scripting capabilities.
When NOT to use Magick
- - You are working on projects in a language other than TypeScript or prefer languages known for rapid prototyping without type safety.
- - Your team strictly adheres to code-only workflows without interest in visual scripting capabilities provided by tools like node editors and blueprint systems.
- - The project requires strict adherence to an open-source license; Magick's licensing is not standard OSS, which can affect integration requirements.
Explore
Sources
Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.
- GitHub stars (langflow-ai/langflow) · observed Aug 2, 2026
- GitHub forks (langflow-ai/langflow) · observed Aug 2, 2026
- Last push (langflow-ai/langflow) · observed Aug 2, 2026
- License file (MIT) · observed Aug 2, 2026
- Decision facts (enrichment) · observed Jul 17, 2026
- Trust scan (lockfile / OSV) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- GitHub stars (Oneirocom/Magick) · observed Aug 22, 2026
- GitHub forks (Oneirocom/Magick) · observed Aug 22, 2026
- Last push (Oneirocom/Magick) · observed Jun 24, 2025
- License file (Other) · observed Aug 22, 2026
- Decision facts (enrichment) · observed Jul 12, 2026
- Trust scan (lockfile / OSV) · observed Jul 11, 2026
GitHub stars on cards: langflow 153k · Magick 847 (synced Aug 2, 2026).
Common questions
- What is the difference between langflow and Magick?
- langflow: Tool for building and deploying AI-powered agents and workflows. Magick: Cutting-edge toolkit for AI builders. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
- When should I choose langflow over Magick?
- Choose langflow over Magick when langflow is primarily Python; Magick is TypeScript; License: langflow is MIT, Magick is Other; Pricing: Open-source under MIT license with community and commercial options available; the OSS version is free to use at your own risk.; Requirements: Min 4 GB RAM; Requires Docker; Requires Python 3.10–3.14, the recommended uv package manager is beneficial but not explicitly required for installation.; Docker can be used to start a Langflow container with default settings.; Tags unique to langflow: agents, chatgpt, generative-ai, large language models; Use Langflow if you are working with Python versions from 3.10 to 3.14, as these versions are specifically supported for seamless operation of the tool.
- When should I choose Magick over langflow?
- Choose Magick over langflow when Magick is primarily TypeScript; langflow is Python; License: Magick is Other, langflow is MIT; Pricing: No explicit pricing details provided in the repository data, indicating a trial or enterprise model potentially requiring direct inquiries for specific terms.; Tags unique to Magick: agent, agi, ai, blueprints-visual-scripting; Also covers Evaluation & Observability, LLM Frameworks; - You are building AI agents or virtual assistants using large language models like Gemini, GPT-3, or GPT-4 that require visual scripting capabilities.
- When should I avoid langflow?
- Do not use Langflow if your Python environment does not align with version constraints between 3.10 and 3.14. Langflow may not be the best fit if you are seeking a platform that operates without any language model integration, as it fundamentally relies on such models for its functionality.
- When should I avoid Magick?
- - You are working on projects in a language other than TypeScript or prefer languages known for rapid prototyping without type safety. - Your team strictly adheres to code-only workflows without interest in visual scripting capabilities provided by tools like node editors and blueprint systems. - The project requires strict adherence to an open-source license; Magick's licensing is not standard OSS, which can affect integration requirements.
- Is langflow or Magick more popular on GitHub?
- langflow has more GitHub stars (152,744 vs 847). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
- Are langflow and Magick open source?
- Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (langflow: MIT, Magick: Other).
- Where can I find alternatives to langflow or Magick?
- GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at langflow alternatives and Magick alternatives (langflow markdown twin, Magick markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
- Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
- Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
- Which is better maintained, langflow or Magick?
- langflow: Very active. Magick: Dormant. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
- Where are the full trust reports for langflow and Magick?
- GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: langflow trust report; Magick trust report.