Home/Compare/dify vs trigger.dev

Comparison

dify vs trigger.dev

Verdict

Pick dify if dify is a comprehensive low-code/no-code AI agentic framework designed for workflow and process automation, offering deployment via Docker Compose and multiple cloud platforms; pick trigger.dev if trigger.dev provides both cloud-managed and self-hosting options for deploying AI agents and workflows, with its platform built using TypeScript.

Markdown twin · dify alternatives · trigger.dev alternatives

GraphCanon updated 1w

dify logo

dify

langgenius/dify

152kpushed Aug 7, 2026
vs
trigger.dev logo

trigger.dev

triggerdotdev/trigger.dev

16kpushed Jul 20, 2026

Trust & integrity

Signaldifytrigger.dev
Maintenance
Very active (0d since push)
As of 1w · github_public_v1
Very active (0d since push)
As of 1mo · github_public_v1
Provenance
Not a fork · Organization account
As of 1w · github_public_v1
Not a fork · Organization account
As of 1mo · github_public_v1
OSV dependency advisories
No lockfile (source not queried)
As of 1mo · osv@v1
No lockfile (source not queried)
As of 1mo · osv@v1
deps.dev advisories
Not queried
deps.dev@v1
Not queried
deps.dev@v1
OpenSSF Scorecard
Not queried
openssf-scorecard@v1
Not queried
openssf-scorecard@v1

Tagline

dify
Production-ready platform for agentic workflow development
trigger.dev
Build and deploy fully-managed AI agents and workflows

Stars

dify
152k
trigger.dev
16k

Forks

dify
24k
trigger.dev
1.4k

Open issues

dify
931
trigger.dev
400

Language

dify
TypeScript
trigger.dev
TypeScript

Adopt for

dify
Dify is a comprehensive low-code/no-code AI agentic framework designed for workflow and process automation, offering deployment via Docker Compose and multiple cloud platforms.
trigger.dev
Trigger.dev provides both cloud-managed and self-hosting options for deploying AI agents and workflows, with its platform built using TypeScript.

Persona

dify
-
trigger.dev
-

Runtime

dify
-
trigger.dev
-

License

dify
Other
trigger.dev
Apache-2.0

Last pushed

dify
Aug 7, 2026
trigger.dev
Jul 20, 2026

Categories

dify
AI Agents
trigger.dev
AI Agents

Trust and health

Open issues (now)

dify
931
trigger.dev
400

Stars delta

dify
+3.6k (30d)
trigger.dev
Unknown

Open issues delta

dify
+118 (30d)
trigger.dev
Unknown

Full report

trigger.dev
Trust report

Typed relationship

dify alternative trigger.devBoth Trigger.dev and dify provide platforms designed to support the creation of sophisticated agentic workflows, essentially offering competitive solutions for developers looking to deploy AI-driven tasks.

Choose dify if…

  • License: dify is Other, trigger.dev is Apache-2.0.
  • Requirements: Min 4 GB RAM; Requires Docker.
  • Both Trigger.dev and dify provide platforms designed to support the creation of sophisticated agentic workflows, essentially offering competitive solutions for developers looking to deploy AI-driven tasks.
  • Tags unique to dify: agent, agentic-ai, agentic-framework, gemini.
  • When you need a production-grade platform with support for various deployment methods such as Docker Compose, Kubernetes Helm Charts, Terraform, AWS CDK, and Alibaba Cloud services.

When NOT to use dify

  • If your project strictly requires a specific proprietary licensing scheme not aligned with Dify’s customized open-source license that is based on Apache 2.0.
  • In cases where the desired workflow development tool should be written in a language other than TypeScript or Python, as Dify centers primarily around these languages.

Choose trigger.dev if…

  • License: trigger.dev is Apache-2.0, dify is Other.
  • Requirements: Min 4 GB RAM; Requires Docker; Self-hosting options are provided, but require Docker Compose or Kubernetes setup knowledge..
  • Both Trigger.dev and dify provide platforms designed to support the creation of sophisticated agentic workflows, essentially offering competitive solutions for developers looking to deploy AI-driven tasks.
  • Tags unique to trigger.dev: ai-agents, background-jobs, orchestration, scheduler.
  • - **Custom Workflows**: If you need to implement complex, custom orchestrations involving different AI tasks that are well-defined and require scalability without managing infrastructure.

When NOT to use trigger.dev

  • - **Minimal AI Workloads**: If your AI usage is minimal or sporadic, you might find the overhead of setting up tasks using the SDK to be unnecessary complexity.
  • - **Cloud Agnosticism**: Preferring a solution that abstracts away cloud-specific configurations, as Trigger.dev’s focus on cloud-managed services and self-hosting options may require more manual work
  • - **Non-TypeScript Ecosystems**: If your project is predominantly in languages other than TypeScript or JavaScript, the available tooling through SDK might not align closely with existing workflows.

Explore

Sources

Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.

GitHub stars on cards: dify 152k · trigger.dev 16k (synced Aug 8, 2026).

Common questions

What is the difference between dify and trigger.dev?
dify: Production-ready platform for agentic workflow development. trigger.dev: Build and deploy fully-managed AI agents and workflows. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
When should I choose dify over trigger.dev?
Choose dify over trigger.dev when License: dify is Other, trigger.dev is Apache-2.0; Requirements: Min 4 GB RAM; Requires Docker; Both Trigger.dev and dify provide platforms designed to support the creation of sophisticated agentic workflows, essentially offering competitive solutions for developers looking to deploy AI-driven tasks; Tags unique to dify: agent, agentic-ai, agentic-framework, gemini; When you need a production-grade platform with support for various deployment methods such as Docker Compose, Kubernetes Helm Charts, Terraform, AWS CDK, and Alibaba Cloud services.
When should I choose trigger.dev over dify?
Choose trigger.dev over dify when License: trigger.dev is Apache-2.0, dify is Other; Requirements: Min 4 GB RAM; Requires Docker; Self-hosting options are provided, but require Docker Compose or Kubernetes setup knowledge.; Both Trigger.dev and dify provide platforms designed to support the creation of sophisticated agentic workflows, essentially offering competitive solutions for developers looking to deploy AI-driven tasks; Tags unique to trigger.dev: ai-agents, background-jobs, orchestration, scheduler; - **Custom Workflows**: If you need to implement complex, custom orchestrations involving different AI tasks that are well-defined and require scalability without managing infrastructure.
When should I avoid dify?
If your project strictly requires a specific proprietary licensing scheme not aligned with Dify’s customized open-source license that is based on Apache 2.0. In cases where the desired workflow development tool should be written in a language other than TypeScript or Python, as Dify centers primarily around these languages.
When should I avoid trigger.dev?
- **Minimal AI Workloads**: If your AI usage is minimal or sporadic, you might find the overhead of setting up tasks using the SDK to be unnecessary complexity. - **Cloud Agnosticism**: Preferring a solution that abstracts away cloud-specific configurations, as Trigger.dev’s focus on cloud-managed services and self-hosting options may require more manual work - **Non-TypeScript Ecosystems**: If your project is predominantly in languages other than TypeScript or JavaScript, the available tooling through SDK might not align closely with existing workflows.
Is dify or trigger.dev more popular on GitHub?
dify has more GitHub stars (151,725 vs 15,695). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
Are dify and trigger.dev open source?
Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (dify: Other, trigger.dev: Apache-2.0).
Where can I find alternatives to dify or trigger.dev?
GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at dify alternatives and trigger.dev alternatives (dify markdown twin, trigger.dev markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
Which is better maintained, dify or trigger.dev?
dify: Very active. trigger.dev: Very active. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
Where are the full trust reports for dify and trigger.dev?
GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: dify trust report; trigger.dev trust report.

Was this helpful?

Anonymous feedback helps us improve pages and translations.