Comparison
LeanCopilot vs moby
Verdict
Pick LeanCopilot when leanCopilot is primarily C++; moby is Go; pick moby when moby is primarily Go; LeanCopilot is C++.
Markdown twin · LeanCopilot alternatives · moby alternatives
GraphCanon updated today
Trust & integrity
| Signal | LeanCopilot | moby |
|---|---|---|
| Maintenance | Active (20d since push) As of today · github_public_v1 | Very active (1d since push) As of today · github_public_v1 |
| Provenance | Not a fork · Organization account As of today · github_public_v1 | Not a fork · Organization account As of today · github_public_v1 |
| Security (OSV) | No lockfile As of today · none | No criticals As of today · osv@v1 |
Tagline
- LeanCopilot
- LLMs as Copilots for Theorem Proving in Lean
- moby
- The Moby Project - a collaborative project for the container ecosystem to assemble container-based systems
Stars
- LeanCopilot
- 1.3k
- moby
- 72k
Forks
- LeanCopilot
- 126
- moby
- 19k
Open issues
- LeanCopilot
- 4
- moby
- 3.8k
Language
- LeanCopilot
- C++
- moby
- Go
Adopt for
- LeanCopilot
- -
- moby
- -
Persona
- LeanCopilot
- -
- moby
- -
Runtime
- LeanCopilot
- -
- moby
- -
License
- LeanCopilot
- MIT
- moby
- Apache-2.0
Last pushed
- LeanCopilot
- Jun 20, 2026
- moby
- Jul 10, 2026
Categories
- LeanCopilot
- LLM Frameworks, Inference & Serving
- moby
- LLM Frameworks, Developer Tools, Inference & Serving
Trust and health
Maintenance
- LeanCopilot
- Active (82%)
- moby
- Very active (96%)
Days since push
- LeanCopilot
- 20d
- moby
- 1d
Open issues (now)
- LeanCopilot
- 4
- moby
- 3.8k
Security scan
- LeanCopilot
- No lockfile
- moby
- No criticals
Full report
- LeanCopilot
- Trust report
- moby
- Trust report
Choose LeanCopilot if…
- LeanCopilot is primarily C++; moby is Go.
- License: LeanCopilot is MIT, moby is Apache-2.0.
- Tags unique to LeanCopilot: lean, formal-mathematics, llm, machine-learning.
When NOT to use LeanCopilot
- LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves.
- Inference & Serving: Self-hosting rarely beats a hosted API on cost until you have steady, high-volume traffic.
Choose moby if…
- moby is primarily Go; LeanCopilot is C++.
- License: moby is Apache-2.0, LeanCopilot is MIT.
- Tags unique to moby: go, docker, golang, containers.
- Also covers Developer Tools.
- moby ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment.
When NOT to use moby
- LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves.
- Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model.
- Inference & Serving: Self-hosting rarely beats a hosted API on cost until you have steady, high-volume traffic.
Explore
Sources
Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.
- GitHub stars (lean-dojo/LeanCopilot) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- GitHub forks (lean-dojo/LeanCopilot) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- Last push (lean-dojo/LeanCopilot) · observed Jun 20, 2026
- License file (MIT) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- Trust scan (lockfile / OSV) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- GitHub stars (moby/moby) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- GitHub forks (moby/moby) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- Last push (moby/moby) · observed Jul 10, 2026
- License file (Apache-2.0) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- Trust scan (lockfile / OSV) · observed Jul 11, 2026
GitHub stars on cards: LeanCopilot 1.3k · moby 72k (synced Jul 11, 2026).
Common questions
- What is the difference between LeanCopilot and moby?
- LeanCopilot: LLMs as Copilots for Theorem Proving in Lean. moby: The Moby Project - a collaborative project for the container ecosystem to assemble container-based systems. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
- When should I choose LeanCopilot over moby?
- Choose LeanCopilot over moby when LeanCopilot is primarily C++; moby is Go; License: LeanCopilot is MIT, moby is Apache-2.0; Tags unique to LeanCopilot: lean, formal-mathematics, llm, machine-learning.
- When should I choose moby over LeanCopilot?
- Choose moby over LeanCopilot when moby is primarily Go; LeanCopilot is C++; License: moby is Apache-2.0, LeanCopilot is MIT; Tags unique to moby: go, docker, golang, containers; Also covers Developer Tools; moby ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment.
- When should I avoid LeanCopilot?
- LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves. Inference & Serving: Self-hosting rarely beats a hosted API on cost until you have steady, high-volume traffic.
- When should I avoid moby?
- LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves. Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model. Inference & Serving: Self-hosting rarely beats a hosted API on cost until you have steady, high-volume traffic.
- Is LeanCopilot or moby more popular on GitHub?
- moby has more GitHub stars (71,899 vs 1,299). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
- Are LeanCopilot and moby open source?
- Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (LeanCopilot: MIT, moby: Apache-2.0).
- Where can I find alternatives to LeanCopilot or moby?
- GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at LeanCopilot alternatives and moby alternatives (LeanCopilot markdown twin, moby markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
- Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
- Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
- Which is better maintained, LeanCopilot or moby?
- LeanCopilot: Active. moby: Very active. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
- Where are the full trust reports for LeanCopilot and moby?
- GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: LeanCopilot trust report; moby trust report.