Home/Compare/lmnr vs openlit

Comparison

lmnr vs openlit

Verdict

Laminar (lmnr) and OpenLIT (openlit) are both open-source tools designed for observability and evaluation of AI agents, but they cater to slightly different needs and preferences.

Markdown twin · lmnr alternatives · openlit alternatives

GraphCanon updated Sep 20, 2026

23views this month

lmnr logo

lmnr

lmnr-ai/lmnr

★ 3.3kpushed Sep 17, 2026
vs
openlit logo

openlit

openlit/openlit

★ 2.8kpushed Sep 17, 2026

Trust & integrity

Signallmnropenlit
Maintenance
Very active (0d since push)
As of Sep 18, 2026 · github_public_v1
Very active (0d since push)
As of Sep 18, 2026 · github_public_v1
Provenance
Not a fork · Organization account
As of Sep 18, 2026 · github_public_v1
Not a fork · Organization account
As of Sep 18, 2026 · github_public_v1
OSV dependency advisories
No lockfile (source not queried)
As of Sep 18, 2026 · osv@v1
No lockfile (source not queried)
As of Sep 18, 2026 · osv@v1
deps.dev advisories
Not queried
deps.dev@v1
Not queried
deps.dev@v1
OpenSSF Scorecard
Not queried
openssf-scorecard@v1
Not queried
openssf-scorecard@v1

Tagline

lmnr
Laminar - open-source observability platform for AI agents
openlit
Open-source observability & evaluation platform for AI agents and coding agents

Stars

lmnr
3.3k
openlit
2.8k

Forks

lmnr
239
openlit
390

Open issues

lmnr
115
openlit
77

Language

lmnr
TypeScript
openlit
TypeScript

Adopt for

lmnr
Laminar, or lmnr, is an open-source observability platform for AI agents, offering both a managed platform and self-hosting options via Docker Compose.
openlit
OpenLIT is an open-source observability and evaluation platform for AI and coding agents, leveraging OpenTelemetry for tracking performance and costs.

Persona

lmnr
-
openlit
-

Runtime

lmnr
-
openlit
-

License

lmnr
Apache-2.0
openlit
Apache-2.0

Last pushed

lmnr
Sep 17, 2026
openlit
Sep 17, 2026

Categories

lmnr
Developer Tools, Evaluation & Observability
openlit
Evaluation & Observability

Trust and health

Open issues (now)

lmnr
115
openlit
77

Stars delta

lmnr
+162 (30d)
openlit
+106 (30d)

Open issues delta

lmnr
+18 (30d)
openlit
+29 (30d)

Full report

Choose lmnr if…

  • Tags unique to lmnr: agent-observability, aiops, llm-observability, llmops.
  • Also covers Developer Tools.
  • Use lmnr when you need a comprehensive observability solution for AI agents that supports both self-hosting and a managed platform.

When NOT to use lmnr

  • Avoid lmnr if you require a platform that does not support self-hosting or if you prefer not to use Docker Compose for deployment.
  • Do not use lmnr if you are looking for a solution that is not open-source or if you need a platform that is not licensed under Apache-2.0.
  • If your project does not involve AI agents or if you do not need the specific observability features provided by lmnr, consider other tools.

Choose openlit if…

  • Pricing: OpenLIT is free and open-source under the Apache License 2.0..
  • Requirements: Installation is available via pip for Python and npm for TypeScript..
  • Tags unique to openlit: ai-engineering, ai-evaluation, ai-observability-platform, amd-gpu.
  • When you need to track and evaluate the performance and costs of AI and coding agents using OpenTelemetry.

When NOT to use openlit

  • If your project does not require observability and evaluation features for AI and coding agents.
  • When you prefer proprietary tools over open-source solutions.
  • If your project does not involve AI applications or does not need detailed cost tracking across multiple dimensions.

Explore

Sources

Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.

GitHub stars on cards: lmnr 3.3k · openlit 2.8k (synced Sep 20, 2026).

Common questions

Which tool should I use if I prefer not to use Docker Compose for deployment?
If you prefer not to use Docker Compose for deployment, OpenLIT might be a better fit as it does not have a specific requirement for Docker Compose like Laminar does.
What if my project does not involve AI agents?
Neither Laminar nor OpenLIT would be suitable if your project does not involve AI agents, as both tools are specifically designed for monitoring and evaluating AI agents.
Can I use these tools if I am looking for a proprietary solution?
No, both Laminar and OpenLIT are open-source tools, so they would not be suitable if you are looking for a proprietary solution.
Which tool should I choose if I need detailed cost tracking?
If detailed cost tracking is a requirement, OpenLIT is the better choice as it supports tracking costs across multiple dimensions and even custom pricing for models.
What is the difference between lmnr and openlit?
lmnr: Laminar - open-source observability platform for AI agents. openlit: Open-source observability & evaluation platform for AI agents and coding agents. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
When should I choose lmnr over openlit?
Choose lmnr over openlit when Tags unique to lmnr: agent-observability, aiops, llm-observability, llmops; Also covers Developer Tools; Use lmnr when you need a comprehensive observability solution for AI agents that supports both self-hosting and a managed platform.
When should I choose openlit over lmnr?
Choose openlit over lmnr when Pricing: OpenLIT is free and open-source under the Apache License 2.0.; Requirements: Installation is available via pip for Python and npm for TypeScript.; Tags unique to openlit: ai-engineering, ai-evaluation, ai-observability-platform, amd-gpu; When you need to track and evaluate the performance and costs of AI and coding agents using OpenTelemetry.
When should I avoid lmnr?
Avoid lmnr if you require a platform that does not support self-hosting or if you prefer not to use Docker Compose for deployment. Do not use lmnr if you are looking for a solution that is not open-source or if you need a platform that is not licensed under Apache-2.0. If your project does not involve AI agents or if you do not need the specific observability features provided by lmnr, consider other tools.
When should I avoid openlit?
If your project does not require observability and evaluation features for AI and coding agents. When you prefer proprietary tools over open-source solutions. If your project does not involve AI applications or does not need detailed cost tracking across multiple dimensions.
Is lmnr or openlit more popular on GitHub?
lmnr has more GitHub stars (3,265 vs 2,770). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
Are lmnr and openlit open source?
Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (lmnr: Apache-2.0, openlit: Apache-2.0).
Where can I find alternatives to lmnr or openlit?
GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at lmnr alternatives and openlit alternatives (lmnr markdown twin, openlit markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
Which is better maintained, lmnr or openlit?
lmnr: Very active. openlit: Very active. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
Where are the full trust reports for lmnr and openlit?
GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: lmnr trust report; openlit trust report.

Was this helpful?

Anonymous feedback helps us improve pages and translations.