Home/Compare/LeanEuclid vs moby

Comparison

LeanEuclid vs moby

Verdict

Pick LeanEuclid when leanEuclid is primarily Lean; moby is Go; pick moby when moby is primarily Go; LeanEuclid is Lean.

Markdown twin · LeanEuclid alternatives · moby alternatives

GraphCanon updated today

LeanEuclid logo

LeanEuclid

loganrjmurphy/LeanEuclid

136pushed Nov 25, 2025
vs
moby logo

moby

moby/moby

72kpushed Jul 10, 2026

Trust & integrity

SignalLeanEuclidmoby
Maintenance
Slowing (227d since push)
As of today · github_public_v1
Very active (1d since push)
As of today · github_public_v1
Provenance
Not a fork · Personal account
As of today · github_public_v1
Not a fork · Organization account
As of today · github_public_v1
Security (OSV)
No lockfile
As of today · none
No criticals
As of today · osv@v1

Tagline

LeanEuclid
LeanEuclid is a benchmark for autoformalization in the domain of Euclidean geometry, targeting the proof assistant Lean.
moby
The Moby Project - a collaborative project for the container ecosystem to assemble container-based systems

Stars

LeanEuclid
136
moby
72k

Forks

LeanEuclid
17
moby
19k

Open issues

LeanEuclid
5
moby
3.8k

Language

LeanEuclid
Lean
moby
Go

Adopt for

LeanEuclid
-
moby
-

Persona

LeanEuclid
-
moby
-

Runtime

LeanEuclid
-
moby
-

License

LeanEuclid
MIT
moby
Apache-2.0

Last pushed

LeanEuclid
Nov 25, 2025
moby
Jul 10, 2026

Categories

LeanEuclid
LLM Frameworks, Computer Vision, Developer Tools
moby
LLM Frameworks, Developer Tools, Inference & Serving

Trust and health

Maintenance

LeanEuclid
Slowing (36%)
moby
Very active (96%)

Days since push

LeanEuclid
227d
moby
1d

Open issues (now)

LeanEuclid
5
moby
3.8k

Owner type

LeanEuclid
User
moby
Organization

Security scan

LeanEuclid
No lockfile
moby
No criticals

Full report

LeanEuclid
Trust report

Choose LeanEuclid if…

  • LeanEuclid is primarily Lean; moby is Go.
  • License: LeanEuclid is MIT, moby is Apache-2.0.
  • Tags unique to LeanEuclid: lean, euclidean-geometry, autoformalization, formalization.
  • Also covers Computer Vision.

When NOT to use LeanEuclid

  • Last GitHub push was 228 days ago (slowing maintenance, Nov 25, 2025). Validate activity before betting a new project on LeanEuclid.
  • LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves.
  • Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model.

Choose moby if…

  • moby is primarily Go; LeanEuclid is Lean.
  • License: moby is Apache-2.0, LeanEuclid is MIT.
  • Tags unique to moby: go, docker, golang, containers.
  • Also covers Inference & Serving.

When NOT to use moby

  • LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves.
  • Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model.
  • Inference & Serving: Self-hosting rarely beats a hosted API on cost until you have steady, high-volume traffic.

Explore

Sources

Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.

GitHub stars on cards: LeanEuclid 136 · moby 72k (synced Jul 11, 2026).

Common questions

What is the difference between LeanEuclid and moby?
LeanEuclid: LeanEuclid is a benchmark for autoformalization in the domain of Euclidean geometry, targeting the proof assistant Lean.. moby: The Moby Project - a collaborative project for the container ecosystem to assemble container-based systems. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
When should I choose LeanEuclid over moby?
Choose LeanEuclid over moby when LeanEuclid is primarily Lean; moby is Go; License: LeanEuclid is MIT, moby is Apache-2.0; Tags unique to LeanEuclid: lean, euclidean-geometry, autoformalization, formalization; Also covers Computer Vision.
When should I choose moby over LeanEuclid?
Choose moby over LeanEuclid when moby is primarily Go; LeanEuclid is Lean; License: moby is Apache-2.0, LeanEuclid is MIT; Tags unique to moby: go, docker, golang, containers; Also covers Inference & Serving.
When should I avoid LeanEuclid?
Last GitHub push was 228 days ago (slowing maintenance, Nov 25, 2025). Validate activity before betting a new project on LeanEuclid. LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves. Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model.
When should I avoid moby?
LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves. Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model. Inference & Serving: Self-hosting rarely beats a hosted API on cost until you have steady, high-volume traffic.
Is LeanEuclid or moby more popular on GitHub?
moby has more GitHub stars (71,899 vs 136). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
Are LeanEuclid and moby open source?
Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (LeanEuclid: MIT, moby: Apache-2.0).
Where can I find alternatives to LeanEuclid or moby?
GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at LeanEuclid alternatives and moby alternatives (LeanEuclid markdown twin, moby markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
Which is better maintained, LeanEuclid or moby?
LeanEuclid: Slowing. moby: Very active. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
Where are the full trust reports for LeanEuclid and moby?
GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: LeanEuclid trust report; moby trust report.