Home/Compare/TypeNo vs artyom.js

Comparison

TypeNo vs artyom.js

Verdict

Pick TypeNo if typeNo is a privacy-focused voice input application tailored for macOS users, emphasizing local processing of audio inputs and built with Swift under the GPL-3.0 license; pick artyom.js if artyom.js is a JavaScript library for integrating voice commands and speech recognition into websites using Google Chrome.

Markdown twin · TypeNo alternatives · artyom.js alternatives

GraphCanon updated 3w

TypeNo logo

TypeNo

marswaveai/TypeNo

880pushed May 26, 2026
vs
artyom.js logo

artyom.js

sdkcarlos/artyom.js

1.3kpushed Jan 24, 2023

Trust & integrity

SignalTypeNoartyom.js
Maintenance
Steady (65d since push)
As of 3w · github_public_v1
Dormant (1282d since push)
As of 3w · github_public_v1
Provenance
Not a fork · Organization account
As of 3w · github_public_v1
Not a fork · Personal account
As of 3w · github_public_v1
OSV dependency advisories
No lockfile (source not queried)
As of 1mo · osv@v1
No lockfile (source not queried)
As of 1mo · osv@v1
deps.dev advisories
Not queried
deps.dev@v1
Not queried
deps.dev@v1
OpenSSF Scorecard
Not queried
openssf-scorecard@v1
Not queried
openssf-scorecard@v1

Tagline

TypeNo
A free, open source, privacy-first voice input app for macOS
artyom.js
voice control - voice commands - speech recognition and speech synthesis JavaScript library

Stars

TypeNo
880
artyom.js
1.3k

Forks

TypeNo
70
artyom.js
363

Open issues

TypeNo
3
artyom.js
73

Language

TypeNo
Swift
artyom.js
JavaScript

Adopt for

TypeNo
TypeNo is a privacy-focused voice input application tailored for macOS users, emphasizing local processing of audio inputs and built with Swift under the GPL-3.0 license.
artyom.js
artyom.js is a JavaScript library for integrating voice commands and speech recognition into websites using Google Chrome.

Persona

TypeNo
-
artyom.js
-

Runtime

TypeNo
-
artyom.js
-

License

TypeNo
GPL-3.0
artyom.js
MIT

Last pushed

TypeNo
May 26, 2026
artyom.js
Jan 24, 2023

Categories

TypeNo
Speech & Audio
artyom.js
Speech & Audio

Trust and health

Maintenance

TypeNo
Steady (60%)
artyom.js
Dormant (18%)

Days since push

TypeNo
65d
artyom.js
1282d

Open issues (now)

TypeNo
3
artyom.js
73

Owner type

TypeNo
Organization
artyom.js
User

Full report

artyom.js
Trust report

Shared compatibility

  • Node.js · TypeNo: Node.js runtime · artyom.js: Node.js runtime

Choose TypeNo if…

  • TypeNo is primarily Swift; artyom.js is JavaScript.
  • License: TypeNo is GPL-3.0, artyom.js is MIT.
  • Tags unique to TypeNo: accessibility, dictation, local-first, macos.
  • When you need to use speech-to-text functionality while valuing your privacy as all its operations are locally performed.

When NOT to use TypeNo

  • In cases where the application requires internet access for server-side processing of voice commands, as TypeNo operates entirely offline with local speech recognition.
  • When development or usage is planned on platforms other than macOS since the app is not compatible or tested outside this ecosystem.

Choose artyom.js if…

  • artyom.js is primarily JavaScript; TypeNo is Swift.
  • License: artyom.js is MIT, TypeNo is GPL-3.0.
  • Tags unique to artyom.js: recognition, speech-recognition, speech-synthesis, speech-to-text.
  • When developing applications that need to be accessible through voice control specifically within Google Chrome environment.

When NOT to use artyom.js

  • If your project requires cross-browser compatibility beyond Google Chrome, as artyom.js is limited to this browser.
  • In scenarios where you need advanced natural language processing capabilities that extend beyond simple command recognition and response.

Explore

Sources

Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.

GitHub stars on cards: TypeNo 880 · artyom.js 1.3k (synced Jul 31, 2026).

Common questions

What is the difference between TypeNo and artyom.js?
TypeNo: A free, open source, privacy-first voice input app for macOS. artyom.js: voice control - voice commands - speech recognition and speech synthesis JavaScript library. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
When should I choose TypeNo over artyom.js?
Choose TypeNo over artyom.js when TypeNo is primarily Swift; artyom.js is JavaScript; License: TypeNo is GPL-3.0, artyom.js is MIT; Tags unique to TypeNo: accessibility, dictation, local-first, macos; When you need to use speech-to-text functionality while valuing your privacy as all its operations are locally performed.
When should I choose artyom.js over TypeNo?
Choose artyom.js over TypeNo when artyom.js is primarily JavaScript; TypeNo is Swift; License: artyom.js is MIT, TypeNo is GPL-3.0; Tags unique to artyom.js: recognition, speech-recognition, speech-synthesis, speech-to-text; When developing applications that need to be accessible through voice control specifically within Google Chrome environment.
When should I avoid TypeNo?
In cases where the application requires internet access for server-side processing of voice commands, as TypeNo operates entirely offline with local speech recognition. When development or usage is planned on platforms other than macOS since the app is not compatible or tested outside this ecosystem.
When should I avoid artyom.js?
If your project requires cross-browser compatibility beyond Google Chrome, as artyom.js is limited to this browser. In scenarios where you need advanced natural language processing capabilities that extend beyond simple command recognition and response.
Is TypeNo or artyom.js more popular on GitHub?
artyom.js has more GitHub stars (1,269 vs 880). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
Are TypeNo and artyom.js open source?
Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (TypeNo: GPL-3.0, artyom.js: MIT).
Where can I find alternatives to TypeNo or artyom.js?
GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at TypeNo alternatives and artyom.js alternatives (TypeNo markdown twin, artyom.js markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
Which is better maintained, TypeNo or artyom.js?
TypeNo: Steady. artyom.js: Dormant. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
Where are the full trust reports for TypeNo and artyom.js?
GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: TypeNo trust report; artyom.js trust report.

Was this helpful?

Anonymous feedback helps us improve pages and translations.