Home/Compare/automl-gs vs scikit-optimize

Comparison

automl-gs vs scikit-optimize

Verdict

Pick automl-gs if automl-gs: Python tool for automated machine-learning model creation from CSV data; pick scikit-optimize if scikit-Optimize is built for minimizing noisy and expensive black-box functions using sequential model-based methods, and it provides a convenient interface with scipy.optimize.

Markdown twin · automl-gs alternatives · scikit-optimize alternatives

GraphCanon updated Oct 3, 2026

10views this month

automl-gs logo

automl-gs

minimaxir/automl-gs

★ 1.9kpushed Oct 22, 2019
vs
scikit-optimize logo

scikit-optimize

scikit-optimize/scikit-optimize

★ 2.8kpushed Feb 23, 2024

Trust & integrity

Signalautoml-gsscikit-optimize
Maintenance
Dormant (2534d since push)
As of Sep 30, 2026 · github_public_v1
Archived (952d since push)
As of Oct 3, 2026 · github_public_v1
Provenance
Not a fork · Personal account
As of Sep 30, 2026 · github_public_v1
Not a fork · Organization account
As of Oct 3, 2026 · github_public_v1
OSV dependency advisories
Published findings
As of Jul 11, 2026 · osv@v1
Published findings
As of Jul 11, 2026 · osv@v1
deps.dev advisories
Not queried
deps.dev@v1
Not queried
deps.dev@v1
OpenSSF Scorecard
Not queried
openssf-scorecard@v1
Not queried
openssf-scorecard@v1

Tagline

automl-gs
Automatically generate machine-learning models and code with input CSV and target field
scikit-optimize
Sequential model-based optimization library with scipy.optimize interface

Stars

automl-gs
1.9k
scikit-optimize
2.8k

Forks

automl-gs
178
scikit-optimize
555

Open issues

automl-gs
28
scikit-optimize
318

Language

automl-gs
Python
scikit-optimize
Python

Adopt for

automl-gs
automl-gs: Python tool for automated machine-learning model creation from CSV data
scikit-optimize
Scikit-Optimize is built for minimizing noisy and expensive black-box functions using sequential model-based methods, and it provides a convenient interface with scipy.optimize.

Persona

automl-gs
-
scikit-optimize
-

Runtime

automl-gs
-
scikit-optimize
-

License

automl-gs
MIT
scikit-optimize
BSD-3-Clause

Last pushed

automl-gs
Oct 22, 2019
scikit-optimize
Feb 23, 2024

Categories

automl-gs
Data & Retrieval, Model Training
scikit-optimize
Model Training

Trust and health

Maintenance

automl-gs
Dormant (18%)
scikit-optimize
Archived (8%)

Days since push

automl-gs
2534d
scikit-optimize
952d

Archived on GitHub

automl-gs
No
scikit-optimize
Yes

Open issues (now)

automl-gs
28
scikit-optimize
318

Stars delta

automl-gs
-2 (30d)
scikit-optimize
+1 (30d)

Owner type

automl-gs
User
scikit-optimize
Organization

Full report

automl-gs
Trust report
scikit-optimize
Trust report

Choose automl-gs if…

  • License: automl-gs is MIT, scikit-optimize is BSD-3-Clause.
  • Tags unique to automl-gs: automl, keras, python, tensorflow.
  • Also covers Data & Retrieval.
  • Need to rapidly prototype models with limited ML expertise

When NOT to use automl-gs

  • Complex feature engineering or non-standard data inputs required
  • Sensitive about licensing of the generated code

Choose scikit-optimize if…

  • License: scikit-optimize is BSD-3-Clause, automl-gs is MIT.
  • Tags unique to scikit-optimize: bayesian-optimization, hyperparameter-tuning, scikit-learn.
  • Use Scikit-Optimize when dealing with optimization problems where function evaluations are expensive or noisy, making traditional derivative-based approaches less effective.

When NOT to use scikit-optimize

  • Avoid using Scikit-Optimize if your optimization function can be efficiently evaluated with a high number of gradients, as it does not perform gradient-based optimization and could be less efficient.
  • Do not select this tool when you need real-time or online learning updates, as its sequential model-based approaches are better suited for batch processing environments.
  • Steer clear if the problems you face have analytical solutions or can be easily solved with traditional gradient descent methods, as Scikit-Optimize’s overhead may not be justified.

Explore

Sources

Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.

GitHub stars on cards: automl-gs 1.9k · scikit-optimize 2.8k (synced Sep 30, 2026).

Common questions

What is the difference between automl-gs and scikit-optimize?
automl-gs: Automatically generate machine-learning models and code with input CSV and target field. scikit-optimize: Sequential model-based optimization library with scipy.optimize interface. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
When should I choose automl-gs over scikit-optimize?
Choose automl-gs over scikit-optimize when License: automl-gs is MIT, scikit-optimize is BSD-3-Clause; Tags unique to automl-gs: automl, keras, python, tensorflow; Also covers Data & Retrieval; Need to rapidly prototype models with limited ML expertise.
When should I choose scikit-optimize over automl-gs?
Choose scikit-optimize over automl-gs when License: scikit-optimize is BSD-3-Clause, automl-gs is MIT; Tags unique to scikit-optimize: bayesian-optimization, hyperparameter-tuning, scikit-learn; Use Scikit-Optimize when dealing with optimization problems where function evaluations are expensive or noisy, making traditional derivative-based approaches less effective.
When should I avoid automl-gs?
Complex feature engineering or non-standard data inputs required Sensitive about licensing of the generated code
When should I avoid scikit-optimize?
Avoid using Scikit-Optimize if your optimization function can be efficiently evaluated with a high number of gradients, as it does not perform gradient-based optimization and could be less efficient. Do not select this tool when you need real-time or online learning updates, as its sequential model-based approaches are better suited for batch processing environments. Steer clear if the problems you face have analytical solutions or can be easily solved with traditional gradient descent methods, as Scikit-Optimize’s overhead may not be justified.
Is automl-gs or scikit-optimize more popular on GitHub?
scikit-optimize has more GitHub stars (2,830 vs 1,867). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
Are automl-gs and scikit-optimize open source?
Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (automl-gs: MIT, scikit-optimize: BSD-3-Clause).
Where can I find alternatives to automl-gs or scikit-optimize?
GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at automl-gs alternatives and scikit-optimize alternatives (automl-gs markdown twin, scikit-optimize markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
Which is better maintained, automl-gs or scikit-optimize?
automl-gs: Dormant. scikit-optimize: Archived. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
Where are the full trust reports for automl-gs and scikit-optimize?
GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: automl-gs trust report; scikit-optimize trust report.

Was this helpful?

Anonymous feedback helps us improve pages and translations.