Home/Compare/moby vs onWatch

Comparison

moby vs onWatch

Verdict

Pick moby when license: moby is Apache-2.0, onWatch is GPL-3.0; pick onWatch when license: onWatch is GPL-3.0, moby is Apache-2.0.

Markdown twin · moby alternatives · onWatch alternatives

GraphCanon updated today

moby logo

moby

moby/moby

72kpushed Jul 10, 2026
vs
onWatch logo

onWatch

onllm-dev/onWatch

673pushed Jun 19, 2026

Trust & integrity

SignalmobyonWatch
Maintenance
Very active (1d since push)
As of today · github_public_v1
Active (22d since push)
As of today · github_public_v1
Provenance
Not a fork · Organization account
As of today · github_public_v1
Not a fork · Organization account
As of today · github_public_v1
Security (OSV)
No criticals
As of today · osv@v1
27 low (27 low)
As of today · osv@v1

Tagline

moby
The Moby Project - a collaborative project for the container ecosystem to assemble container-based systems
onWatch
Track AI API quotas across Synthetic, Z.ai, Anthropic (Claude Code), Codex, GitHub Copilot & Antigravity in real time. Lightweight background daemon (<50MB RAM), SQLite storage, Material Design 3 dash

Stars

moby
72k
onWatch
673

Forks

moby
19k
onWatch
51

Open issues

moby
3.8k
onWatch
11

Language

moby
Go
onWatch
Go

Adopt for

moby
-
onWatch
-

Persona

moby
-
onWatch
-

Runtime

moby
-
onWatch
-

License

moby
Apache-2.0
onWatch
GPL-3.0

Last pushed

moby
Jul 10, 2026
onWatch
Jun 19, 2026

Categories

moby
LLM Frameworks, Developer Tools, Inference & Serving
onWatch
LLM Frameworks, Computer Vision, Inference & Serving

Trust and health

Maintenance

moby
Very active (96%)
onWatch
Active (82%)

Days since push

moby
1d
onWatch
22d

Open issues (now)

moby
3.8k
onWatch
11

Security scan

moby
No criticals
onWatch
27 low (27 low)

Full report

Choose moby if…

  • License: moby is Apache-2.0, onWatch is GPL-3.0.
  • Tags unique to moby: go, docker, containers.
  • Also covers Developer Tools.

When NOT to use moby

  • LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves.
  • Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model.
  • Inference & Serving: Self-hosting rarely beats a hosted API on cost until you have steady, high-volume traffic.

Choose onWatch if…

  • License: onWatch is GPL-3.0, moby is Apache-2.0.
  • Tags unique to onWatch: ai-api-monitoring, api-monitoring, codex, antigravity.
  • Also covers Computer Vision.

When NOT to use onWatch

  • LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves.
  • Inference & Serving: Self-hosting rarely beats a hosted API on cost until you have steady, high-volume traffic.

Explore

Sources

Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.

GitHub stars on cards: moby 72k · onWatch 673 (synced Jul 11, 2026).

Common questions

What is the difference between moby and onWatch?
moby: The Moby Project - a collaborative project for the container ecosystem to assemble container-based systems. onWatch: Track AI API quotas across Synthetic, Z.ai, Anthropic (Claude Code), Codex, GitHub Copilot & Antigravity in real time. Lightweight background daemon (<50MB RAM), SQLite storage, Material Design 3 dash. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
When should I choose moby over onWatch?
Choose moby over onWatch when License: moby is Apache-2.0, onWatch is GPL-3.0; Tags unique to moby: go, docker, containers; Also covers Developer Tools.
When should I choose onWatch over moby?
Choose onWatch over moby when License: onWatch is GPL-3.0, moby is Apache-2.0; Tags unique to onWatch: ai-api-monitoring, api-monitoring, codex, antigravity; Also covers Computer Vision.
When should I avoid moby?
LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves. Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model. Inference & Serving: Self-hosting rarely beats a hosted API on cost until you have steady, high-volume traffic.
When should I avoid onWatch?
LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves. Inference & Serving: Self-hosting rarely beats a hosted API on cost until you have steady, high-volume traffic.
Is moby or onWatch more popular on GitHub?
moby has more GitHub stars (71,899 vs 673). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
Are moby and onWatch open source?
Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (moby: Apache-2.0, onWatch: GPL-3.0).
Where can I find alternatives to moby or onWatch?
GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at moby alternatives and onWatch alternatives (moby markdown twin, onWatch markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
Which is better maintained, moby or onWatch?
moby: Very active. onWatch: Active. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
Where are the full trust reports for moby and onWatch?
GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: moby trust report; onWatch trust report.