Home/Compare/moby vs ggrun

Comparison

moby vs ggrun

Verdict

Pick moby when license: moby is Apache-2.0, ggrun is MIT; pick ggrun when license: ggrun is MIT, moby is Apache-2.0.

Markdown twin · moby alternatives · ggrun alternatives

GraphCanon updated today

moby logo

moby

moby/moby

72kpushed Jul 10, 2026
vs
ggrun logo

ggrun

raketenkater/ggrun

254pushed Jul 14, 2026

Trust & integrity

Signalmobyggrun
Maintenance
Very active (1d since push)
As of 3d · github_public_v1
Very active (0d since push)
As of today · github_public_v1
Provenance
Not a fork · Organization account
As of 3d · github_public_v1
Not a fork · Personal account
As of today · github_public_v1
OSV dependency advisories
No published findings from this source as of 2026-07-11
As of 3d · osv@v1
No lockfile (source not queried)
As of today · osv@v1
deps.dev advisories
Not queried
deps.dev@v1
Not queried
deps.dev@v1
OpenSSF Scorecard
Not queried
openssf-scorecard@v1
Not queried
openssf-scorecard@v1

Tagline

moby
The Moby Project - a collaborative project for the container ecosystem to assemble container-based systems
ggrun
Auto-tuned launcher for GGUF models on llama.cpp / ik_llama.cpp, OpenAI-compatible server with multi-GPU tensor-split, MoE expert placement, measured flag tuning (AI Tune), hardware-matched HuggingFac

Stars

moby
72k
ggrun
254

Forks

moby
19k
ggrun
14

Open issues

moby
3.8k
ggrun
3

Language

moby
Go
ggrun
Go

Adopt for

moby
-
ggrun
-

Persona

moby
-
ggrun
-

Runtime

moby
-
ggrun
-

License

moby
Apache-2.0
ggrun
MIT

Last pushed

moby
Jul 10, 2026
ggrun
Jul 14, 2026

Categories

moby
Developer Tools, Inference & Serving, LLM Frameworks
ggrun
Inference & Serving, LLM Frameworks

Trust and health

Days since push

moby
1d
ggrun
0d

Open issues (now)

moby
3.8k
ggrun
3

Owner type

moby
Organization
ggrun
User

OSV dependency advisories

moby
No published findings from this source as of 2026-07-11
ggrun
No lockfile (source not queried)

Full report

Choose moby if…

  • License: moby is Apache-2.0, ggrun is MIT.
  • Tags unique to moby: containers, docker, go.
  • Also covers Developer Tools.
  • moby ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment.

When NOT to use moby

  • Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model.
  • Inference & Serving: Self-hosting rarely beats a hosted API on cost until you have steady, high-volume traffic.
  • LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves.

Choose ggrun if…

  • License: ggrun is MIT, moby is Apache-2.0.
  • Tags unique to ggrun: cuda, gguf, inference-server, llama-cpp.
  • More recently updated (last pushed Jul 14, 2026).

When NOT to use ggrun

  • Inference & Serving: Self-hosting rarely beats a hosted API on cost until you have steady, high-volume traffic.
  • LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves.

Explore

Sources

Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.

GitHub stars on cards: moby 72k · ggrun 254 (synced Jul 11, 2026).

Common questions

What is the difference between moby and ggrun?
moby: The Moby Project - a collaborative project for the container ecosystem to assemble container-based systems. ggrun: Auto-tuned launcher for GGUF models on llama.cpp / ik_llama.cpp, OpenAI-compatible server with multi-GPU tensor-split, MoE expert placement, measured flag tuning (AI Tune), hardware-matched HuggingFac. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
When should I choose moby over ggrun?
Choose moby over ggrun when License: moby is Apache-2.0, ggrun is MIT; Tags unique to moby: containers, docker, go; Also covers Developer Tools; moby ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment.
When should I choose ggrun over moby?
Choose ggrun over moby when License: ggrun is MIT, moby is Apache-2.0; Tags unique to ggrun: cuda, gguf, inference-server, llama-cpp; More recently updated (last pushed Jul 14, 2026).
When should I avoid moby?
Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model. Inference & Serving: Self-hosting rarely beats a hosted API on cost until you have steady, high-volume traffic. LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves.
When should I avoid ggrun?
Inference & Serving: Self-hosting rarely beats a hosted API on cost until you have steady, high-volume traffic. LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves.
Is moby or ggrun more popular on GitHub?
moby has more GitHub stars (71,899 vs 254). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
Are moby and ggrun open source?
Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (moby: Apache-2.0, ggrun: MIT).
Where can I find alternatives to moby or ggrun?
GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at moby alternatives and ggrun alternatives (moby markdown twin, ggrun markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
Which is better maintained, moby or ggrun?
moby: Very active. ggrun: Very active. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
Where are the full trust reports for moby and ggrun?
GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: moby trust report; ggrun trust report.

Was this helpful?

Anonymous feedback helps us improve pages and translations.