Home/Compare/moby vs langchaingo

Comparison

moby vs langchaingo

Verdict

Pick moby when license: moby is Apache-2.0, langchaingo is MIT; pick langchaingo when license: langchaingo is MIT, moby is Apache-2.0.

Markdown twin · moby alternatives · langchaingo alternatives

GraphCanon updated today

moby logo

moby

moby/moby

72kpushed Jul 10, 2026
vs
langchaingo logo

langchaingo

tmc/langchaingo

9.5kpushed Jan 11, 2026

Trust & integrity

Signalmobylangchaingo
Maintenance
Very active (1d since push)
As of today · github_public_v1
Slowing (180d since push)
As of today · github_public_v1
Provenance
Not a fork · Organization account
As of today · github_public_v1
Not a fork · Personal account
As of today · github_public_v1
Security (OSV)
No criticals
As of today · osv@v1
22 low (22 low)
As of today · osv@v1

Tagline

moby
The Moby Project - a collaborative project for the container ecosystem to assemble container-based systems
langchaingo
LangChain for Go, the easiest way to write LLM-based programs in Go

Stars

moby
72k
langchaingo
9.5k

Forks

moby
19k
langchaingo
1.1k

Open issues

moby
3.8k
langchaingo
404

Language

moby
Go
langchaingo
Go

Adopt for

moby
-
langchaingo
LangChainGo simplifies the integration of Large Language Models into Go projects through easy-to-use APIs and composability.

Persona

moby
-
langchaingo
-

Runtime

moby
-
langchaingo
-

License

moby
Apache-2.0
langchaingo
MIT

Last pushed

moby
Jul 10, 2026
langchaingo
Jan 11, 2026

Categories

moby
LLM Frameworks, Developer Tools, Inference & Serving
langchaingo
LLM Frameworks, Developer Tools

Trust and health

Maintenance

moby
Very active (96%)
langchaingo
Slowing (36%)

Days since push

moby
1d
langchaingo
180d

Open issues (now)

moby
3.8k
langchaingo
404

Owner type

moby
Organization
langchaingo
User

Security scan

moby
No criticals
langchaingo
22 low (22 low)

Full report

langchaingo
Trust report

Choose moby if…

  • License: moby is Apache-2.0, langchaingo is MIT.
  • Tags unique to moby: docker, containers.
  • Also covers Inference & Serving.
  • moby ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment.

When NOT to use moby

  • LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves.
  • Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model.
  • Inference & Serving: Self-hosting rarely beats a hosted API on cost until you have steady, high-volume traffic.

Choose langchaingo if…

  • License: langchaingo is MIT, moby is Apache-2.0.
  • Tags unique to langchaingo: ai, langchain.
  • - You are working on a project that requires LLM-based capabilities, but prefer to code in Go.

When NOT to use langchaingo

  • - If your project strictly adheres to another programming language where other implementations of LangChain are available.
  • - When your application requires heavy customization at the framework level that might not be directly supported within LangChainGo’s current implementation.

Explore

Sources

Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.

GitHub stars on cards: moby 72k · langchaingo 9.5k (synced Jul 11, 2026).

Common questions

What is the difference between moby and langchaingo?
moby: The Moby Project - a collaborative project for the container ecosystem to assemble container-based systems. langchaingo: LangChain for Go, the easiest way to write LLM-based programs in Go. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
When should I choose moby over langchaingo?
Choose moby over langchaingo when License: moby is Apache-2.0, langchaingo is MIT; Tags unique to moby: docker, containers; Also covers Inference & Serving; moby ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment.
When should I choose langchaingo over moby?
Choose langchaingo over moby when License: langchaingo is MIT, moby is Apache-2.0; Tags unique to langchaingo: ai, langchain; - You are working on a project that requires LLM-based capabilities, but prefer to code in Go.
When should I avoid moby?
LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves. Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model. Inference & Serving: Self-hosting rarely beats a hosted API on cost until you have steady, high-volume traffic.
When should I avoid langchaingo?
- If your project strictly adheres to another programming language where other implementations of LangChain are available. - When your application requires heavy customization at the framework level that might not be directly supported within LangChainGo’s current implementation.
Is moby or langchaingo more popular on GitHub?
moby has more GitHub stars (71,899 vs 9,527). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
Are moby and langchaingo open source?
Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (moby: Apache-2.0, langchaingo: MIT).
Where can I find alternatives to moby or langchaingo?
GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at moby alternatives and langchaingo alternatives (moby markdown twin, langchaingo markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
Which is better maintained, moby or langchaingo?
moby: Very active. langchaingo: Slowing. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
Where are the full trust reports for moby and langchaingo?
GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: moby trust report; langchaingo trust report.