Comparison
Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills vs AI-Infra-Guard
Verdict
Pick Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills if anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills is a comprehensive repository of 817 structured cybersecurity skills mapped across six industry frameworks, making it highly versatile for various AI platforms and security needs; pick AI-Infra-Guard if aI-Infra-Guard is designed for organizations looking to secure their AI infrastructures comprehensively through various scanning and evaluation tools.
Markdown twin · Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills alternatives · AI-Infra-Guard alternatives
GraphCanon updated 1w
vs
Trust & integrity
| Signal | Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills | AI-Infra-Guard |
|---|---|---|
| Maintenance | Active (8d since push) As of 1w · github_public_v1 | Very active (0d since push) As of 4w · github_public_v1 |
| Provenance | Not a fork · Personal account As of 1w · github_public_v1 | Not a fork · Organization account As of 4w · github_public_v1 |
| OSV dependency advisories | No lockfile (source not queried) As of 1mo · osv@v1 | No lockfile (source not queried) As of 1mo · osv@v1 |
| deps.dev advisories | Not queried deps.dev@v1 | Not queried deps.dev@v1 |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | Not queried openssf-scorecard@v1 | Not queried openssf-scorecard@v1 |
Tagline
- Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
- 817 structured cybersecurity skills for AI agents
- AI-Infra-Guard
- A full-stack AI Red Teaming platform securing AI ecosystems
Stars
- Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
- 28k
- AI-Infra-Guard
- 4.3k
Forks
- Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
- 3.4k
- AI-Infra-Guard
- 419
Open issues
- Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
- 46
- AI-Infra-Guard
- 13
Language
- Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
- Python
- AI-Infra-Guard
- Python
Adopt for
- Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
- Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills is a comprehensive repository of 817 structured cybersecurity skills mapped across six industry frameworks, making it highly versatile for various AI platforms and security needs.
- AI-Infra-Guard
- AI-Infra-Guard is designed for organizations looking to secure their AI infrastructures comprehensively through various scanning and evaluation tools.
Persona
- Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
- -
- AI-Infra-Guard
- -
Runtime
- Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
- -
- AI-Infra-Guard
- -
License
- Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
- Apache-2.0
- AI-Infra-Guard
- Apache-2.0
Last pushed
- Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
- Aug 8, 2026
- AI-Infra-Guard
- Jul 28, 2026
Categories
- Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
- AI Agents, Evaluation & Observability
- AI-Infra-Guard
- Evaluation & Observability, LLM Frameworks
Trust and health
Maintenance
- Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
- Active (82%)
- AI-Infra-Guard
- Very active (96%)
Days since push
- Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
- 8d
- AI-Infra-Guard
- 0d
Open issues (now)
- Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
- 46
- AI-Infra-Guard
- 13
Stars delta
- Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
- +2.3k (30d)
- AI-Infra-Guard
- Unknown
Open issues delta
- Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
- +6 (30d)
- AI-Infra-Guard
- Unknown
Owner type
- Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
- User
- AI-Infra-Guard
- Organization
Full report
- Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
- Trust report
- AI-Infra-Guard
- Trust report
Choose Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills if…
- Pricing: Available under the Apache 2.0 license, ensuring free access and modification but without guaranteeing commercial support..
- Requirements: Min 4 GB RAM; Supports integration with over 20 platforms including Claude Code and GitHub Copilot; Requires basic understanding of cybersecurity frameworks for optimal use.
- Tags unique to Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills: ai-agents, cybersecurity, mitre-attack, nist-csf.
- Also covers AI Agents.
- - Use when you require integration with multiple cybersecurity frameworks like MITRE ATT&CK, NIST CSF 2.0, and others, providing a robust foundation for skill-based operations.
When NOT to use Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
- - Avoid if your project specifically requires skills mapped exclusively to a single framework not among the six supported by Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills.
- - Not suitable for projects that do not align with or benefit from the agentskills.io standard implementation, as it might limit customization options.
Choose AI-Infra-Guard if…
- Tags unique to AI-Infra-Guard: agent-security, ai-red-teaming, llm-evaluation, security-tools.
- Also covers LLM Frameworks.
- AI-Infra-Guard ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment.
- If you need advanced LLM jailbreak evaluation capabilities specific to the vulnerabilities identified by Tencent's research, consider using AI-Infra-Guard.
When NOT to use AI-Infra-Guard
- Avoid if you are looking exclusively for a tool that focuses solely on the runtime behavior of LLMs without broader infrastructural scanning capabilities.
- Not recommended when your primary focus is on network-level security rather than comprehensive AI infrastructure security assessments and evaluations.
Explore
Sources
Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.
- GitHub stars (mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills) · observed Aug 16, 2026
- GitHub forks (mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills) · observed Aug 16, 2026
- Last push (mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills) · observed Aug 8, 2026
- License file (Apache-2.0) · observed Aug 16, 2026
- Decision facts (enrichment) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- Trust scan (lockfile / OSV) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- GitHub stars (Tencent/AI-Infra-Guard) · observed Jul 28, 2026
- GitHub forks (Tencent/AI-Infra-Guard) · observed Jul 28, 2026
- Last push (Tencent/AI-Infra-Guard) · observed Jul 28, 2026
- License file (Apache-2.0) · observed Jul 28, 2026
- Decision facts (enrichment) · observed Jul 17, 2026
- Trust scan (lockfile / OSV) · observed Jul 11, 2026
GitHub stars on cards: Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills 28k · AI-Infra-Guard 4.3k (synced Aug 16, 2026).
Common questions
- What is the difference between Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills and AI-Infra-Guard?
- Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills: 817 structured cybersecurity skills for AI agents. AI-Infra-Guard: A full-stack AI Red Teaming platform securing AI ecosystems. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
- When should I choose Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills over AI-Infra-Guard?
- Choose Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills over AI-Infra-Guard when Pricing: Available under the Apache 2.0 license, ensuring free access and modification but without guaranteeing commercial support.; Requirements: Min 4 GB RAM; Supports integration with over 20 platforms including Claude Code and GitHub Copilot; Requires basic understanding of cybersecurity frameworks for optimal use; Tags unique to Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills: ai-agents, cybersecurity, mitre-attack, nist-csf; Also covers AI Agents; - Use when you require integration with multiple cybersecurity frameworks like MITRE ATT&CK, NIST CSF 2.0, and others, providing a robust foundation for skill-based operations.
- When should I choose AI-Infra-Guard over Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills?
- Choose AI-Infra-Guard over Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills when Tags unique to AI-Infra-Guard: agent-security, ai-red-teaming, llm-evaluation, security-tools; Also covers LLM Frameworks; AI-Infra-Guard ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment; If you need advanced LLM jailbreak evaluation capabilities specific to the vulnerabilities identified by Tencent's research, consider using AI-Infra-Guard.
- When should I avoid Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills?
- - Avoid if your project specifically requires skills mapped exclusively to a single framework not among the six supported by Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills. - Not suitable for projects that do not align with or benefit from the agentskills.io standard implementation, as it might limit customization options.
- When should I avoid AI-Infra-Guard?
- Avoid if you are looking exclusively for a tool that focuses solely on the runtime behavior of LLMs without broader infrastructural scanning capabilities. Not recommended when your primary focus is on network-level security rather than comprehensive AI infrastructure security assessments and evaluations.
- Is Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills or AI-Infra-Guard more popular on GitHub?
- Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills has more GitHub stars (27,958 vs 4,316). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
- Are Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills and AI-Infra-Guard open source?
- Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills: Apache-2.0, AI-Infra-Guard: Apache-2.0).
- Where can I find alternatives to Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills or AI-Infra-Guard?
- GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills alternatives and AI-Infra-Guard alternatives (Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills markdown twin, AI-Infra-Guard markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
- Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
- Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
- Which is better maintained, Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills or AI-Infra-Guard?
- Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills: Active. AI-Infra-Guard: Very active. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
- Where are the full trust reports for Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills and AI-Infra-Guard?
- GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills trust report; AI-Infra-Guard trust report.