Comparison
garak vs llm-app
Verdict
Pick garak when garak is primarily Python; llm-app is Jupyter Notebook; pick llm-app when llm-app is primarily Jupyter Notebook; garak is Python.
Markdown twin · garak alternatives · llm-app alternatives
GraphCanon updated today
Trust & integrity
| Signal | garak | llm-app |
|---|---|---|
| Maintenance | Very active (1d since push) As of today · github_public_v1 | Very active (5d since push) As of today · github_public_v1 |
| Provenance | Not a fork · Organization account As of today · github_public_v1 | Not a fork · Organization account As of today · github_public_v1 |
| Security (OSV) | 54 low (54 low) As of today · osv@v1 | No lockfile As of today · none |
Tagline
- garak
- the LLM vulnerability scanner
- llm-app
- Ready-to-run cloud templates for RAG, AI pipelines, and enterprise search with live data.
Stars
- garak
- 8.4k
- llm-app
- 59k
Forks
- garak
- 1.1k
- llm-app
- 1.4k
Open issues
- garak
- 367
- llm-app
- 10
Language
- garak
- Python
- llm-app
- Jupyter Notebook
Adopt for
- garak
- -
- llm-app
- llm-app offers pre-configured cloud deployment templates designed specifically for creating AI-driven applications such as chatbots and machine learning projects leveraging Hugging Face models. It supports direct integrz
Persona
- garak
- -
- llm-app
- -
Runtime
- garak
- -
- llm-app
- -
License
- garak
- Apache-2.0
- llm-app
- MIT
Last pushed
- garak
- Jul 10, 2026
- llm-app
- Jul 5, 2026
Categories
- garak
- Vector Databases, LLM Frameworks, Evaluation & Observability
- llm-app
- Vector Databases, Data & Retrieval, LLM Frameworks
Trust and health
Days since push
- garak
- 1d
- llm-app
- 5d
Open issues (now)
- garak
- 367
- llm-app
- 10
Security scan
- garak
- 54 low (54 low)
- llm-app
- No lockfile
Full report
- garak
- Trust report
- llm-app
- Trust report
Choose garak if…
- garak is primarily Python; llm-app is Jupyter Notebook.
- License: garak is Apache-2.0, llm-app is MIT.
- Tags unique to garak: ai, python, security-scanners, llm-security.
- Also covers Evaluation & Observability.
When NOT to use garak
- Vector Databases: Don't reach for a dedicated vector DB under ~100k vectors; pgvector on your existing Postgres is simpler to operate.
- LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves.
- Evaluation & Observability: Defer heavyweight eval infra only until you have real traffic - never skip it once users depend on answers.
Choose llm-app if…
- llm-app is primarily Jupyter Notebook; garak is Python.
- License: llm-app is MIT, garak is Apache-2.0.
- Requirements: Requires Docker; The tool is Docker-friendly and designed to ensure synchronization with cloud-based storage solutions among others..
- Tags unique to llm-app: vector-database, llm, hugging-face, retrieval-augmented-generation.
- Also covers Data & Retrieval.
- - You need a ready-to-run solution that directly integrates with various data sources like Sharepoint, Google Drive, S3, Kafka, PostgreSQL, and live APIs.
When NOT to use llm-app
- - You require custom deployment configurations that extend beyond the pre-set cloud templates available through llm-app.
- - There’s a need for tightly integrated support with data sources or APIs not explicitly mentioned, such as specialized CRM systems (Salesforce), which may lack direct template support in llm-app.
Explore
Sources
Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.
- GitHub stars (NVIDIA/garak) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- GitHub forks (NVIDIA/garak) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- Last push (NVIDIA/garak) · observed Jul 10, 2026
- License file (Apache-2.0) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- Trust scan (lockfile / OSV) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- GitHub stars (pathwaycom/llm-app) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- GitHub forks (pathwaycom/llm-app) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- Last push (pathwaycom/llm-app) · observed Jul 5, 2026
- License file (MIT) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- Decision facts (enrichment) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- Trust scan (lockfile / OSV) · observed Jul 11, 2026
GitHub stars on cards: garak 8.4k · llm-app 59k (synced Jul 11, 2026).
Common questions
- What is the difference between garak and llm-app?
- garak: the LLM vulnerability scanner. llm-app: Ready-to-run cloud templates for RAG, AI pipelines, and enterprise search with live data.. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
- When should I choose garak over llm-app?
- Choose garak over llm-app when garak is primarily Python; llm-app is Jupyter Notebook; License: garak is Apache-2.0, llm-app is MIT; Tags unique to garak: ai, python, security-scanners, llm-security; Also covers Evaluation & Observability.
- When should I choose llm-app over garak?
- Choose llm-app over garak when llm-app is primarily Jupyter Notebook; garak is Python; License: llm-app is MIT, garak is Apache-2.0; Requirements: Requires Docker; The tool is Docker-friendly and designed to ensure synchronization with cloud-based storage solutions among others.; Tags unique to llm-app: vector-database, llm, hugging-face, retrieval-augmented-generation; Also covers Data & Retrieval; - You need a ready-to-run solution that directly integrates with various data sources like Sharepoint, Google Drive, S3, Kafka, PostgreSQL, and live APIs.
- When should I avoid garak?
- Vector Databases: Don't reach for a dedicated vector DB under ~100k vectors; pgvector on your existing Postgres is simpler to operate. LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves. Evaluation & Observability: Defer heavyweight eval infra only until you have real traffic - never skip it once users depend on answers.
- When should I avoid llm-app?
- - You require custom deployment configurations that extend beyond the pre-set cloud templates available through llm-app. - There’s a need for tightly integrated support with data sources or APIs not explicitly mentioned, such as specialized CRM systems (Salesforce), which may lack direct template support in llm-app.
- Is garak or llm-app more popular on GitHub?
- llm-app has more GitHub stars (59,068 vs 8,400). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
- Are garak and llm-app open source?
- Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (garak: Apache-2.0, llm-app: MIT).
- Where can I find alternatives to garak or llm-app?
- GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at garak alternatives and llm-app alternatives (garak markdown twin, llm-app markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
- Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
- Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
- Which is better maintained, garak or llm-app?
- garak: Very active. llm-app: Very active. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
- Where are the full trust reports for garak and llm-app?
- GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: garak trust report; llm-app trust report.