Comparison
garak vs ChatGLM-6B
Verdict
Pick garak when tags unique to garak: ai, llm-evaluation, llm-security, security-scanners; pick ChatGLM-6B when also covers Data & Retrieval.
Markdown twin · garak alternatives · ChatGLM-6B alternatives
GraphCanon updated today
Trust & integrity
| Signal | garak | ChatGLM-6B |
|---|---|---|
| Maintenance | Very active (1d since push) As of today · github_public_v1 | Dormant (744d since push) As of today · github_public_v1 |
| Provenance | Not a fork · Organization account As of today · github_public_v1 | Not a fork · Organization account As of today · github_public_v1 |
| Security (OSV) | 54 low (54 low) As of today · osv@v1 | 75 low (75 low) As of today · osv@v1 |
Tagline
- garak
- the LLM vulnerability scanner
- ChatGLM-6B
- ChatGLM-6B: An Open Bilingual Dialogue Language Model | 开源双语对话语言模型
Stars
- garak
- 8.4k
- ChatGLM-6B
- 41k
Forks
- garak
- 1.1k
- ChatGLM-6B
- 5.1k
Open issues
- garak
- 367
- ChatGLM-6B
- 609
Language
- garak
- Python
- ChatGLM-6B
- Python
Adopt for
- garak
- -
- ChatGLM-6B
- -
Persona
- garak
- -
- ChatGLM-6B
- -
Runtime
- garak
- -
- ChatGLM-6B
- -
License
- garak
- Apache-2.0
- ChatGLM-6B
- Apache-2.0
Last pushed
- garak
- Jul 10, 2026
- ChatGLM-6B
- Jun 27, 2024
Categories
- garak
- Evaluation & Observability, LLM Frameworks, Vector Databases
- ChatGLM-6B
- Data & Retrieval, LLM Frameworks, Vector Databases
Trust and health
Maintenance
- garak
- Very active (96%)
- ChatGLM-6B
- Dormant (18%)
Days since push
- garak
- 1d
- ChatGLM-6B
- 744d
Open issues (now)
- garak
- 367
- ChatGLM-6B
- 609
Security scan
- garak
- 54 low (54 low)
- ChatGLM-6B
- 75 low (75 low)
Full report
- garak
- Trust report
- ChatGLM-6B
- Trust report
Shared compatibility
- Python · garak: Python runtime · ChatGLM-6B: Python runtime
Choose garak if…
- Tags unique to garak: ai, llm-evaluation, llm-security, security-scanners.
- Also covers Evaluation & Observability.
- More recently updated (last pushed Jul 10, 2026).
When NOT to use garak
- Evaluation & Observability: Defer heavyweight eval infra only until you have real traffic - never skip it once users depend on answers.
- LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves.
- Vector Databases: Don't reach for a dedicated vector DB under ~100k vectors; pgvector on your existing Postgres is simpler to operate.
Choose ChatGLM-6B if…
- Also covers Data & Retrieval.
- More GitHub stars (41k vs 8.4k) - visibility, not fit.
When NOT to use ChatGLM-6B
- Last GitHub push was 745 days ago (dormant maintenance, Jun 27, 2024). Validate activity before betting a new project on ChatGLM-6B.
- Data & Retrieval: Skip a heavy ingestion framework when your corpus is small and static; a script plus the embedding API is enough.
- LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves.
- Vector Databases: Don't reach for a dedicated vector DB under ~100k vectors; pgvector on your existing Postgres is simpler to operate.
Explore
Sources
Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.
- GitHub stars (NVIDIA/garak) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- GitHub forks (NVIDIA/garak) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- Last push (NVIDIA/garak) · observed Jul 10, 2026
- License file (Apache-2.0) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- Trust scan (lockfile / OSV) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- GitHub stars (zai-org/ChatGLM-6B) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- GitHub forks (zai-org/ChatGLM-6B) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- Last push (zai-org/ChatGLM-6B) · observed Jun 27, 2024
- License file (Apache-2.0) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- Trust scan (lockfile / OSV) · observed Jul 11, 2026
GitHub stars on cards: garak 8.4k · ChatGLM-6B 41k (synced Jul 11, 2026).
Common questions
- What is the difference between garak and ChatGLM-6B?
- garak: the LLM vulnerability scanner. ChatGLM-6B: ChatGLM-6B: An Open Bilingual Dialogue Language Model | 开源双语对话语言模型. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
- When should I choose garak over ChatGLM-6B?
- Choose garak over ChatGLM-6B when Tags unique to garak: ai, llm-evaluation, llm-security, security-scanners; Also covers Evaluation & Observability; More recently updated (last pushed Jul 10, 2026).
- When should I choose ChatGLM-6B over garak?
- Choose ChatGLM-6B over garak when Also covers Data & Retrieval; More GitHub stars (41k vs 8.4k) - visibility, not fit.
- When should I avoid garak?
- Evaluation & Observability: Defer heavyweight eval infra only until you have real traffic - never skip it once users depend on answers. LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves. Vector Databases: Don't reach for a dedicated vector DB under ~100k vectors; pgvector on your existing Postgres is simpler to operate.
- When should I avoid ChatGLM-6B?
- Last GitHub push was 745 days ago (dormant maintenance, Jun 27, 2024). Validate activity before betting a new project on ChatGLM-6B. Data & Retrieval: Skip a heavy ingestion framework when your corpus is small and static; a script plus the embedding API is enough. LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves. Vector Databases: Don't reach for a dedicated vector DB under ~100k vectors; pgvector on your existing Postgres is simpler to operate.
- Is garak or ChatGLM-6B more popular on GitHub?
- ChatGLM-6B has more GitHub stars (41,035 vs 8,400). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
- Are garak and ChatGLM-6B open source?
- Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (garak: Apache-2.0, ChatGLM-6B: Apache-2.0).
- Where can I find alternatives to garak or ChatGLM-6B?
- GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at garak alternatives and ChatGLM-6B alternatives (garak markdown twin, ChatGLM-6B markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
- Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
- Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
- Which is better maintained, garak or ChatGLM-6B?
- garak: Very active. ChatGLM-6B: Dormant. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
- Where are the full trust reports for garak and ChatGLM-6B?
- GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: garak trust report; ChatGLM-6B trust report.