Comparison
raft vs llm-app
Verdict
Pick raft when raft is primarily Cuda; llm-app is Jupyter Notebook; pick llm-app when llm-app is primarily Jupyter Notebook; raft is Cuda.
Markdown twin · raft alternatives · llm-app alternatives
GraphCanon updated today
Trust & integrity
| Signal | raft | llm-app |
|---|---|---|
| Maintenance | Very active (0d since push) As of today · github_public_v1 | Very active (5d since push) As of today · github_public_v1 |
| Provenance | Not a fork · Organization account As of today · github_public_v1 | Not a fork · Organization account As of today · github_public_v1 |
| Security (OSV) | No lockfile As of today · none | No lockfile As of today · none |
Tagline
- raft
- RAFT contains fundamental widely-used algorithms and primitives for machine learning and information retrieval. The algorithms are CUDA-accelerated and form building blocks for more easily writing hig
- llm-app
- Ready-to-run cloud templates for RAG, AI pipelines, and enterprise search with live data.
Stars
- raft
- 1.0k
- llm-app
- 59k
Forks
- raft
- 240
- llm-app
- 1.4k
Open issues
- raft
- 448
- llm-app
- 10
Language
- raft
- Cuda
- llm-app
- Jupyter Notebook
Adopt for
- raft
- -
- llm-app
- llm-app offers pre-configured cloud deployment templates designed specifically for creating AI-driven applications such as chatbots and machine learning projects leveraging Hugging Face models. It supports direct integrz
Persona
- raft
- -
- llm-app
- -
Runtime
- raft
- -
- llm-app
- -
License
- raft
- Apache-2.0
- llm-app
- MIT
Last pushed
- raft
- Jul 11, 2026
- llm-app
- Jul 5, 2026
Categories
- raft
- Vector Databases, LLM Frameworks, Data & Retrieval
- llm-app
- Vector Databases, Data & Retrieval, LLM Frameworks
Trust and health
Days since push
- raft
- 0d
- llm-app
- 5d
Open issues (now)
- raft
- 448
- llm-app
- 10
Full report
- raft
- Trust report
- llm-app
- Trust report
Choose raft if…
- raft is primarily Cuda; llm-app is Jupyter Notebook.
- License: raft is Apache-2.0, llm-app is MIT.
- Tags unique to raft: clustering, anns, gpu, building-blocks.
When NOT to use raft
- Vector Databases: Don't reach for a dedicated vector DB under ~100k vectors; pgvector on your existing Postgres is simpler to operate.
- LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves.
- Data & Retrieval: Skip a heavy ingestion framework when your corpus is small and static; a script plus the embedding API is enough.
Choose llm-app if…
- llm-app is primarily Jupyter Notebook; raft is Cuda.
- License: llm-app is MIT, raft is Apache-2.0.
- Requirements: Requires Docker; The tool is Docker-friendly and designed to ensure synchronization with cloud-based storage solutions among others..
- Tags unique to llm-app: vector-database, llm, hugging-face, retrieval-augmented-generation.
- - You need a ready-to-run solution that directly integrates with various data sources like Sharepoint, Google Drive, S3, Kafka, PostgreSQL, and live APIs.
When NOT to use llm-app
- - You require custom deployment configurations that extend beyond the pre-set cloud templates available through llm-app.
- - There’s a need for tightly integrated support with data sources or APIs not explicitly mentioned, such as specialized CRM systems (Salesforce), which may lack direct template support in llm-app.
Explore
Sources
Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.
- GitHub stars (NVIDIA/raft) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- GitHub forks (NVIDIA/raft) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- Last push (NVIDIA/raft) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- License file (Apache-2.0) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- Trust scan (lockfile / OSV) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- GitHub stars (pathwaycom/llm-app) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- GitHub forks (pathwaycom/llm-app) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- Last push (pathwaycom/llm-app) · observed Jul 5, 2026
- License file (MIT) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- Decision facts (enrichment) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- Trust scan (lockfile / OSV) · observed Jul 11, 2026
GitHub stars on cards: raft 1.0k · llm-app 59k (synced Jul 11, 2026).
Common questions
- What is the difference between raft and llm-app?
- raft: RAFT contains fundamental widely-used algorithms and primitives for machine learning and information retrieval. The algorithms are CUDA-accelerated and form building blocks for more easily writing hig. llm-app: Ready-to-run cloud templates for RAG, AI pipelines, and enterprise search with live data.. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
- When should I choose raft over llm-app?
- Choose raft over llm-app when raft is primarily Cuda; llm-app is Jupyter Notebook; License: raft is Apache-2.0, llm-app is MIT; Tags unique to raft: clustering, anns, gpu, building-blocks.
- When should I choose llm-app over raft?
- Choose llm-app over raft when llm-app is primarily Jupyter Notebook; raft is Cuda; License: llm-app is MIT, raft is Apache-2.0; Requirements: Requires Docker; The tool is Docker-friendly and designed to ensure synchronization with cloud-based storage solutions among others.; Tags unique to llm-app: vector-database, llm, hugging-face, retrieval-augmented-generation; - You need a ready-to-run solution that directly integrates with various data sources like Sharepoint, Google Drive, S3, Kafka, PostgreSQL, and live APIs.
- When should I avoid raft?
- Vector Databases: Don't reach for a dedicated vector DB under ~100k vectors; pgvector on your existing Postgres is simpler to operate. LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves. Data & Retrieval: Skip a heavy ingestion framework when your corpus is small and static; a script plus the embedding API is enough.
- When should I avoid llm-app?
- - You require custom deployment configurations that extend beyond the pre-set cloud templates available through llm-app. - There’s a need for tightly integrated support with data sources or APIs not explicitly mentioned, such as specialized CRM systems (Salesforce), which may lack direct template support in llm-app.
- Is raft or llm-app more popular on GitHub?
- llm-app has more GitHub stars (59,068 vs 1,026). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
- Are raft and llm-app open source?
- Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (raft: Apache-2.0, llm-app: MIT).
- Where can I find alternatives to raft or llm-app?
- GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at raft alternatives and llm-app alternatives (raft markdown twin, llm-app markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
- Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
- Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
- Which is better maintained, raft or llm-app?
- raft: Very active. llm-app: Very active. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
- Where are the full trust reports for raft and llm-app?
- GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: raft trust report; llm-app trust report.