Comparison
OpenHands vs code-review-graph
Verdict
Pick OpenHands when license: OpenHands is Other, code-review-graph is MIT; pick code-review-graph when license: code-review-graph is MIT, OpenHands is Other.
Markdown twin · OpenHands alternatives · code-review-graph alternatives
GraphCanon updated today
vs
Trust & integrity
| Signal | OpenHands | code-review-graph |
|---|---|---|
| Maintenance | Very active (0d since push) As of today · github_public_v1 | Active (26d since push) As of today · github_public_v1 |
| Provenance | Not a fork · Organization account As of today · github_public_v1 | Not a fork · Personal account As of today · github_public_v1 |
| Security (OSV) | No lockfile As of today · none | No MCP manifest As of today · mcp_manifest |
Tagline
- OpenHands
- AI-Driven Development
- code-review-graph
- Local-first code intelligence graph for MCP and CLI. Builds a persistent map of your codebase so AI coding tools read only what matters, with benchmarked context reductions on reviews and large-repo w
Stars
- OpenHands
- 80k
- code-review-graph
- 19k
Forks
- OpenHands
- 10k
- code-review-graph
- 2.1k
Open issues
- OpenHands
- 359
- code-review-graph
- 185
Language
- OpenHands
- Python
- code-review-graph
- Python
Adopt for
- OpenHands
- OpenHands is an AI-driven development tool that integrates with multiple AI models like ChatGPT and Claude-AI to offer intelligent support for coding tasks in Python.
- code-review-graph
- -
Persona
- OpenHands
- -
- code-review-graph
- -
Runtime
- OpenHands
- -
- code-review-graph
- -
License
- OpenHands
- Other
- code-review-graph
- MIT
Last pushed
- OpenHands
- Jul 11, 2026
- code-review-graph
- Jun 14, 2026
Categories
- OpenHands
- LLM Frameworks, Developer Tools
- code-review-graph
- LLM Frameworks, Developer Tools, Evaluation & Observability
Trust and health
Maintenance
- OpenHands
- Very active (96%)
- code-review-graph
- Active (82%)
Days since push
- OpenHands
- 0d
- code-review-graph
- 26d
Open issues (now)
- OpenHands
- 359
- code-review-graph
- 185
Owner type
- OpenHands
- Organization
- code-review-graph
- User
Security scan
- OpenHands
- No lockfile
- code-review-graph
- No MCP manifest
Full report
- OpenHands
- Trust report
- code-review-graph
- Trust report
Choose OpenHands if…
- License: OpenHands is Other, code-review-graph is MIT.
- Tags unique to OpenHands: claude-ai, artificial-intelligence, chatgpt, openai.
- - You are working predominantly on Python projects requiring integration of advanced AI functionalities such as those offered by ChatGPT or Claude-AI.
When NOT to use OpenHands
- - If your project primarily uses technologies outside Python and you do not intend to integrate with ChatGPT or Claude-AI models specifically.
- - When the need for customization in AI model integration is limited, as OpenHands is more rigid in its current support for specific models like ChatGPT and Claude-AI.
Choose code-review-graph if…
- License: code-review-graph is MIT, OpenHands is Other.
- Tags unique to code-review-graph: graphrag, ai-coding, incremental, claude.
- Also covers Evaluation & Observability.
When NOT to use code-review-graph
- LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves.
- Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model.
- Evaluation & Observability: Defer heavyweight eval infra only until you have real traffic - never skip it once users depend on answers.
Explore
Sources
Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.
- GitHub stars (OpenHands/OpenHands) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- GitHub forks (OpenHands/OpenHands) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- Last push (OpenHands/OpenHands) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- License file (Other) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- Decision facts (enrichment) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- Trust scan (lockfile / OSV) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- GitHub stars (tirth8205/code-review-graph) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- GitHub forks (tirth8205/code-review-graph) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- Last push (tirth8205/code-review-graph) · observed Jun 14, 2026
- License file (MIT) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- Trust scan (lockfile / OSV) · observed Jul 11, 2026
GitHub stars on cards: OpenHands 80k · code-review-graph 19k (synced Jul 11, 2026).
Common questions
- What is the difference between OpenHands and code-review-graph?
- OpenHands: AI-Driven Development. code-review-graph: Local-first code intelligence graph for MCP and CLI. Builds a persistent map of your codebase so AI coding tools read only what matters, with benchmarked context reductions on reviews and large-repo w. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
- When should I choose OpenHands over code-review-graph?
- Choose OpenHands over code-review-graph when License: OpenHands is Other, code-review-graph is MIT; Tags unique to OpenHands: claude-ai, artificial-intelligence, chatgpt, openai; - You are working predominantly on Python projects requiring integration of advanced AI functionalities such as those offered by ChatGPT or Claude-AI.
- When should I choose code-review-graph over OpenHands?
- Choose code-review-graph over OpenHands when License: code-review-graph is MIT, OpenHands is Other; Tags unique to code-review-graph: graphrag, ai-coding, incremental, claude; Also covers Evaluation & Observability.
- When should I avoid OpenHands?
- - If your project primarily uses technologies outside Python and you do not intend to integrate with ChatGPT or Claude-AI models specifically. - When the need for customization in AI model integration is limited, as OpenHands is more rigid in its current support for specific models like ChatGPT and Claude-AI.
- When should I avoid code-review-graph?
- LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves. Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model. Evaluation & Observability: Defer heavyweight eval infra only until you have real traffic - never skip it once users depend on answers.
- Is OpenHands or code-review-graph more popular on GitHub?
- OpenHands has more GitHub stars (80,430 vs 19,416). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
- Are OpenHands and code-review-graph open source?
- Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (OpenHands: Other, code-review-graph: MIT).
- Where can I find alternatives to OpenHands or code-review-graph?
- GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at OpenHands alternatives and code-review-graph alternatives (OpenHands markdown twin, code-review-graph markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
- Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
- Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
- Which is better maintained, OpenHands or code-review-graph?
- OpenHands: Very active. code-review-graph: Active. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
- Where are the full trust reports for OpenHands and code-review-graph?
- GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: OpenHands trust report; code-review-graph trust report.