Home/Compare/fastembed vs awesome

Comparison

fastembed vs awesome

Verdict

Pick fastembed when license: fastembed is Apache-2.0, awesome is CC0-1.0; pick awesome when license: awesome is CC0-1.0, fastembed is Apache-2.0.

Markdown twin · fastembed alternatives · awesome alternatives

GraphCanon updated today

fastembed logo

fastembed

qdrant/fastembed

3.1kpushed Jun 23, 2026
vs
awesome logo

awesome

sindresorhus/awesome

484kpushed Jun 30, 2026

Trust & integrity

Signalfastembedawesome
Maintenance
Active (18d since push)
As of today · github_public_v1
Active (11d since push)
As of today · github_public_v1
Provenance
Not a fork · Organization account
As of today · github_public_v1
Not a fork · Personal account
As of today · github_public_v1
Security (OSV)
No lockfile
As of today · none
No lockfile
As of today · none

Tagline

fastembed
Fast, Accurate, Lightweight Python library to make State of the Art Embedding
awesome
😎 Curated list of awesome topics including hardware resources

Stars

fastembed
3.1k
awesome
484k

Forks

fastembed
213
awesome
36k

Open issues

fastembed
137
awesome
92

Language

fastembed
Python
awesome
-

Adopt for

fastembed
-
awesome
-

Persona

fastembed
-
awesome
-

Runtime

fastembed
-
awesome
-

License

fastembed
Apache-2.0
awesome
CC0-1.0

Last pushed

fastembed
Jun 23, 2026
awesome
Jun 30, 2026

Categories

fastembed
LLM Frameworks, Data & Retrieval, Vector Databases
awesome
LLM Frameworks

Trust and health

Days since push

fastembed
18d
awesome
11d

Open issues (now)

fastembed
137
awesome
92

Owner type

fastembed
Organization
awesome
User

Full report

fastembed
Trust report

Choose fastembed if…

  • License: fastembed is Apache-2.0, awesome is CC0-1.0.
  • Tags unique to fastembed: embeddings, python, rag, retrieval-augmented-generation.
  • Also covers Data & Retrieval, Vector Databases.

When NOT to use fastembed

  • LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves.
  • Data & Retrieval: Skip a heavy ingestion framework when your corpus is small and static; a script plus the embedding API is enough.
  • Vector Databases: Don't reach for a dedicated vector DB under ~100k vectors; pgvector on your existing Postgres is simpler to operate.

Choose awesome if…

  • License: awesome is CC0-1.0, fastembed is Apache-2.0.
  • Tags unique to awesome: resources, awesome-list.
  • More GitHub stars (484k vs 3.1k) - visibility, not fit.

When NOT to use awesome

  • LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves.

Explore

Sources

Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.

GitHub stars on cards: fastembed 3.1k · awesome 484k (synced Jul 11, 2026).

Common questions

What is the difference between fastembed and awesome?
fastembed: Fast, Accurate, Lightweight Python library to make State of the Art Embedding. awesome: 😎 Curated list of awesome topics including hardware resources. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
When should I choose fastembed over awesome?
Choose fastembed over awesome when License: fastembed is Apache-2.0, awesome is CC0-1.0; Tags unique to fastembed: embeddings, python, rag, retrieval-augmented-generation; Also covers Data & Retrieval, Vector Databases.
When should I choose awesome over fastembed?
Choose awesome over fastembed when License: awesome is CC0-1.0, fastembed is Apache-2.0; Tags unique to awesome: resources, awesome-list; More GitHub stars (484k vs 3.1k) - visibility, not fit.
When should I avoid fastembed?
LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves. Data & Retrieval: Skip a heavy ingestion framework when your corpus is small and static; a script plus the embedding API is enough. Vector Databases: Don't reach for a dedicated vector DB under ~100k vectors; pgvector on your existing Postgres is simpler to operate.
When should I avoid awesome?
LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves.
Is fastembed or awesome more popular on GitHub?
awesome has more GitHub stars (484,026 vs 3,085). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
Are fastembed and awesome open source?
Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (fastembed: Apache-2.0, awesome: CC0-1.0).
Where can I find alternatives to fastembed or awesome?
GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at fastembed alternatives and awesome alternatives (fastembed markdown twin, awesome markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
Which is better maintained, fastembed or awesome?
fastembed: Active. awesome: Active. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
Where are the full trust reports for fastembed and awesome?
GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: fastembed trust report; awesome trust report.