Home/Compare/auto-evaluator vs awesome

Comparison

auto-evaluator vs awesome

Verdict

Pick auto-evaluator when tags unique to auto-evaluator: python; pick awesome when tags unique to awesome: resources, awesome-list.

Markdown twin · auto-evaluator alternatives · awesome alternatives

GraphCanon updated today

auto-evaluator logo

auto-evaluator

rlancemartin/auto-evaluator

1.1kpushed May 10, 2023
vs
awesome logo

awesome

sindresorhus/awesome

484kpushed Jun 30, 2026

Trust & integrity

Signalauto-evaluatorawesome
Maintenance
Dormant (1158d since push)
As of today · github_public_v1
Active (11d since push)
As of today · github_public_v1
Provenance
Not a fork · Personal account
As of today · github_public_v1
Not a fork · Personal account
As of today · github_public_v1
Security (OSV)
118 low (118 low)
As of today · osv@v1
No lockfile
As of today · none

Tagline

auto-evaluator
Evaluation tool for LLM QA chains
awesome
😎 Curated list of awesome topics including hardware resources

Stars

auto-evaluator
1.1k
awesome
484k

Forks

auto-evaluator
92
awesome
36k

Open issues

auto-evaluator
3
awesome
92

Language

auto-evaluator
Python
awesome
-

Adopt for

auto-evaluator
-
awesome
-

Persona

auto-evaluator
-
awesome
-

Runtime

auto-evaluator
-
awesome
-

License

auto-evaluator
-
awesome
CC0-1.0

Last pushed

auto-evaluator
May 10, 2023
awesome
Jun 30, 2026

Categories

auto-evaluator
Vector Databases, LLM Frameworks, Data & Retrieval
awesome
LLM Frameworks

Trust and health

Maintenance

auto-evaluator
Dormant (18%)
awesome
Active (82%)

Days since push

auto-evaluator
1158d
awesome
11d

Open issues (now)

auto-evaluator
3
awesome
92

Security scan

auto-evaluator
118 low (118 low)
awesome
No lockfile

Full report

auto-evaluator
Trust report

Choose auto-evaluator if…

  • Tags unique to auto-evaluator: python.
  • Also covers Vector Databases, Data & Retrieval.
  • Leaner open-issue backlog (3).

When NOT to use auto-evaluator

  • Last GitHub push was 1159 days ago (dormant maintenance, May 10, 2023). Validate activity before betting a new project on auto-evaluator.
  • Vector Databases: Don't reach for a dedicated vector DB under ~100k vectors; pgvector on your existing Postgres is simpler to operate.
  • LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves.
  • Data & Retrieval: Skip a heavy ingestion framework when your corpus is small and static; a script plus the embedding API is enough.

Choose awesome if…

  • Tags unique to awesome: resources, awesome-list.
  • More GitHub stars (484k vs 1.1k) - visibility, not fit.

When NOT to use awesome

  • LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves.

Explore

Sources

Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.

GitHub stars on cards: auto-evaluator 1.1k · awesome 484k (synced Jul 11, 2026).

Common questions

What is the difference between auto-evaluator and awesome?
auto-evaluator: Evaluation tool for LLM QA chains. awesome: 😎 Curated list of awesome topics including hardware resources. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
When should I choose auto-evaluator over awesome?
Choose auto-evaluator over awesome when Tags unique to auto-evaluator: python; Also covers Vector Databases, Data & Retrieval; Leaner open-issue backlog (3).
When should I choose awesome over auto-evaluator?
Choose awesome over auto-evaluator when Tags unique to awesome: resources, awesome-list; More GitHub stars (484k vs 1.1k) - visibility, not fit.
When should I avoid auto-evaluator?
Last GitHub push was 1159 days ago (dormant maintenance, May 10, 2023). Validate activity before betting a new project on auto-evaluator. Vector Databases: Don't reach for a dedicated vector DB under ~100k vectors; pgvector on your existing Postgres is simpler to operate. LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves. Data & Retrieval: Skip a heavy ingestion framework when your corpus is small and static; a script plus the embedding API is enough.
When should I avoid awesome?
LLM Frameworks: Avoid a framework for a single prompt-and-retrieve call; the abstraction can cost more than it saves.
Is auto-evaluator or awesome more popular on GitHub?
awesome has more GitHub stars (484,026 vs 1,102). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
Are auto-evaluator and awesome open source?
Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub.
Where can I find alternatives to auto-evaluator or awesome?
GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at auto-evaluator alternatives and awesome alternatives (auto-evaluator markdown twin, awesome markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
Which is better maintained, auto-evaluator or awesome?
auto-evaluator: Dormant. awesome: Active. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
Where are the full trust reports for auto-evaluator and awesome?
GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: auto-evaluator trust report; awesome trust report.