Trust and health report
Interactive-LLM-Powered-NPCs - trust report
Sourced, dated trust signals - maintenance label posture, repository provenance, and security scan status. Not a composite safety grade.
GraphCanon updated Sep 23, 2026 · GitHub synced Sep 23, 2026
34views this month
Maintenance
Recency and activity heuristics from public GitHub metadata (maintenance label, momentum); methodology: github_public_v1.
last push 3d ago · last release Sep 17, 2023
+7 stars (30d) · -1 open issues (30d)
Provenance
Repository identity and fork provenance (github_public_v1).
- GitHub repo id: 659030774
- Not a fork
- Personal account
- Computed Sep 23, 2026
Security intelligence
Source-by-source security scan results from public intelligence providers. Missing, partial, or failed queries are shown explicitly and are not treated as clean.
OSV dependency advisories
No published findings from this source as of 2026-07-11- Last query
- Jul 11, 2026
- Scanner
- osv@v1
OpenSSF Scorecard
Not queried- Scanner
- openssf-scorecard@v1
Weekly public scans omit some checks at scale.
View source evidenceMethod and caveats: these are sourced, dated heuristics from public GitHub data and external security intelligence providers. A status like "no published findings from this source" is not a guarantee of safety. Read the full trust methodology · JSON report at /api/graphcanon/tools/akshitireddy-interactive-llm-powered-npcs/trust.
Common questions
- Is Interactive-LLM-Powered-NPCs maintained?
- GraphCanon rates Interactive-LLM-Powered-NPCs "Very active" (96% maintenance signal from public GitHub metadata, computed Sep 23, 2026). Last push was 3 days ago. This is a recency heuristic, not a guarantee the project will stay maintained.
- Is Interactive-LLM-Powered-NPCs safe to use?
- Last scanned Jul 11, 2026 (deps profile). Status: No criticals. Absence of findings in our scan is not a security guarantee - see trust methodology for scope limits. GraphCanon does not certify Interactive-LLM-Powered-NPCs as safe - review maintenance, provenance, and scan findings on this page before adopting.
- Is Interactive-LLM-Powered-NPCs a fork?
- No. Interactive-LLM-Powered-NPCs is not flagged as a fork in GitHub metadata at the time of the last refresh.
- Does Interactive-LLM-Powered-NPCs have known security vulnerabilities?
- Last scanned Jul 11, 2026 (deps profile). Status: No criticals. Absence of findings in our scan is not a security guarantee - see trust methodology for scope limits.
- How often is the Interactive-LLM-Powered-NPCs trust report updated?
- Trust signals refresh on GitHub ingest/refresh cycles and optional dependency/MCP scans. This report was computed Sep 23, 2026 (methodology github_public_v1).
- What does GraphCanon never claim about Interactive-LLM-Powered-NPCs?
- We never publish a composite safety grade, pen-test endorsement, or "verified secure" label for Interactive-LLM-Powered-NPCs. Signals are sourced heuristics with explicit limits - see trust methodology.
- How does GraphCanon assess trust for Interactive-LLM-Powered-NPCs?
- Signals are sourced from public GitHub metadata and optional dependency/MCP manifest scans, each tagged with methodology version and computed date. GraphCanon does not publish a composite safety grade. Read trust methodology for full scope and limits.