Home/IndustryBench/Trust report

Trust and health report

IndustryBench - trust report

Sourced, dated trust signals - maintenance label posture, repository provenance, and security scan status. Not a composite safety grade.

GraphCanon updated Sep 20, 2026 · GitHub synced Sep 20, 2026

34views this month

Maintenance

Recency and activity heuristics from public GitHub metadata (maintenance label, momentum); methodology: github_public_v1.

Slowing36% signal

last push 96d ago

+1 stars (30d) · 0 open issues (30d)

Provenance

Repository identity and fork provenance (github_public_v1).

  • GitHub repo id: 1236570104
  • Not a fork
  • Verified publisher: organization account
  • Computed Sep 20, 2026

Security intelligence

Source-by-source security scan results from public intelligence providers. Missing, partial, or failed queries are shown explicitly and are not treated as clean.

OSV dependency advisories

Published findings
Last query
Jul 11, 2026
Scanner
osv@v1
Stored findings
7
View source evidence

deps.dev advisories

Not queried
Scanner
deps.dev@v1
View source evidence

OpenSSF Scorecard

Not queried
Scanner
openssf-scorecard@v1

Weekly public scans omit some checks at scale.

View source evidence

Dependency advisories (deduplicated)

Requests vulnerable to .netrc credentials leak via malicious URLs
requests@2.28.0 · CVE-2024-47081 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
Requests `Session` object does not verify requests after making first request with verify=False
requests@2.28.0 · CVE-2024-35195 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
Requests has Insecure Temp File Reuse in its extract_zipped_paths() utility function
requests@2.28.0 · CVE-2026-25645 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
Unintended leak of Proxy-Authorization header in requests
requests@2.28.0 · CVE-2023-32681 · osv@v1
requirements.txt

Method and caveats: these are sourced, dated heuristics from public GitHub data and external security intelligence providers. A status like "no published findings from this source" is not a guarantee of safety. Read the full trust methodology · JSON report at /api/graphcanon/tools/alibaba-multimodal-industrial-ai-industrybench/trust.

Common questions

Is IndustryBench maintained?
GraphCanon rates IndustryBench "Slowing" (36% maintenance signal from public GitHub metadata, computed Sep 20, 2026). Last push was 96 days ago. This is a recency heuristic, not a guarantee the project will stay maintained.
Is IndustryBench safe to use?
Last scanned Jul 11, 2026 (deps profile). Status: 4 medium, 3 low - 4 medium, 3 low finding(s) in the latest scan. GraphCanon does not claim the project is safe or vulnerability-free; review findings on the trust report. GraphCanon does not certify IndustryBench as safe - review maintenance, provenance, and scan findings on this page before adopting.
Is IndustryBench a fork?
No. IndustryBench is not flagged as a fork in GitHub metadata at the time of the last refresh.
Does IndustryBench have known security vulnerabilities?
Last scanned Jul 11, 2026 (deps profile). Status: 4 medium, 3 low - 4 medium, 3 low finding(s) in the latest scan. GraphCanon does not claim the project is safe or vulnerability-free; review findings on the trust report.
How often is the IndustryBench trust report updated?
Trust signals refresh on GitHub ingest/refresh cycles and optional dependency/MCP scans. This report was computed Sep 20, 2026 (methodology github_public_v1).
What does GraphCanon never claim about IndustryBench?
We never publish a composite safety grade, pen-test endorsement, or "verified secure" label for IndustryBench. Signals are sourced heuristics with explicit limits - see trust methodology.
How does GraphCanon assess trust for IndustryBench?
Signals are sourced from public GitHub metadata and optional dependency/MCP manifest scans, each tagged with methodology version and computed date. GraphCanon does not publish a composite safety grade. Read trust methodology for full scope and limits.

Was this helpful?

Anonymous feedback helps us improve pages and translations.