Home/mengram/Trust report

Trust and health report

mengram - trust report

Sourced, dated trust signals - maintenance label posture, repository provenance, and security scan status. Not a composite safety grade.

GraphCanon updated 2w · GitHub synced 2w

Maintenance

Recency and activity heuristics from public GitHub metadata (maintenance label, momentum); methodology: github_public_v1.

Very active96% signal

last push 3d ago · last release 3mo · 1 releases (90d)

Provenance

Repository identity and fork provenance (github_public_v1).

  • GitHub repo id: 1154785536
  • Not a fork
  • Personal account
  • Computed 2w

Security intelligence

Source-by-source security scan results from public intelligence providers. Missing, partial, or failed queries are shown explicitly and are not treated as clean.

OSV dependency advisories

Published findings
Last query
1mo
Scanner
osv@v1
Stored findings
23
View source evidence

deps.dev advisories

Not queried
Scanner
deps.dev@v1
View source evidence

OpenSSF Scorecard

Not queried
Scanner
openssf-scorecard@v1

Weekly public scans omit some checks at scale.

View source evidence

Dependency advisories (deduplicated)

PYSEC-2024-38
fastapi@0.100 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
GHSA-hc5x-x2vx-497g
gunicorn@21.0 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
GHSA-w3h3-4rj7-4ph4
gunicorn@21.0 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
PYSEC-2026-1433
gunicorn@21.0 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
PYSEC-2026-1434
gunicorn@21.0 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
GHSA-2jv5-9r88-3w3p
python-multipart@0.0.6 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
GHSA-59g5-xgcq-4qw3
python-multipart@0.0.6 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
GHSA-5rvq-cxj2-64vf
python-multipart@0.0.6 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
GHSA-6jv3-5f52-599m
python-multipart@0.0.6 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
GHSA-mj87-hwqh-73pj
python-multipart@0.0.6 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
GHSA-pp6c-gr5w-3c5g
python-multipart@0.0.6 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
GHSA-v9pg-7xvm-68hf
python-multipart@0.0.6 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
GHSA-vffw-93wf-4j4q
python-multipart@0.0.6 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
GHSA-wp53-j4wj-2cfg
python-multipart@0.0.6 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
PYSEC-2026-1850
python-multipart@0.0.6 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
PYSEC-2026-1851
python-multipart@0.0.6 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
PYSEC-2026-1852
python-multipart@0.0.6 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
GHSA-3qhf-m339-9g5v
mcp@1.0 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
GHSA-9h52-p55h-vw2f
mcp@1.0 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
GHSA-j975-95f5-7wqh
mcp@1.0 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
PYSEC-2026-1616
mcp@1.0 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
PYSEC-2026-1617
mcp@1.0 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
PYSEC-2026-1618
mcp@1.0 · osv@v1
requirements.txt

Method and caveats: these are sourced, dated heuristics from public GitHub data and external security intelligence providers. A status like "no published findings from this source" is not a guarantee of safety. Read the full trust methodology · JSON report at /api/graphcanon/tools/alibaizhanov-mengram/trust.

Common questions

Is mengram maintained?
GraphCanon rates mengram "Very active" (96% maintenance signal from public GitHub metadata, computed 2w). Last push was 3 days ago. 1 GitHub releases in the last 90 days. This is a recency heuristic, not a guarantee the project will stay maintained.
Is mengram safe to use?
Last scanned 1mo (deps profile). Status: 23 low - 23 low finding(s) in the latest scan. GraphCanon does not claim the project is safe or vulnerability-free; review findings on the trust report. GraphCanon does not certify mengram as safe - review maintenance, provenance, and scan findings on this page before adopting.
Is mengram a fork?
No. mengram is not flagged as a fork in GitHub metadata at the time of the last refresh.
Does mengram have known security vulnerabilities?
Last scanned 1mo (deps profile). Status: 23 low - 23 low finding(s) in the latest scan. GraphCanon does not claim the project is safe or vulnerability-free; review findings on the trust report.
How often is the mengram trust report updated?
Trust signals refresh on GitHub ingest/refresh cycles and optional dependency/MCP scans. This report was computed 2w (methodology github_public_v1).
What does GraphCanon never claim about mengram?
We never publish a composite safety grade, pen-test endorsement, or "verified secure" label for mengram. Signals are sourced heuristics with explicit limits - see trust methodology.
How does GraphCanon assess trust for mengram?
Signals are sourced from public GitHub metadata and optional dependency/MCP manifest scans, each tagged with methodology version and computed date. GraphCanon does not publish a composite safety grade. Read trust methodology for full scope and limits.

Was this helpful?

Anonymous feedback helps us improve pages and translations.