Home/auto-sklearn/Trust report

Trust and health report

auto-sklearn - trust report

Sourced, dated trust signals - maintenance label posture, repository provenance, and security scan status. Not a composite safety grade.

GraphCanon updated 2w · GitHub synced 2w

Maintenance

Recency and activity heuristics from public GitHub metadata (maintenance label, momentum); methodology: github_public_v1.

Steady60% signal

last push 35d ago · last release 3y

Provenance

Repository identity and fork provenance (github_public_v1).

Security intelligence

Source-by-source security scan results from public intelligence providers. Missing, partial, or failed queries are shown explicitly and are not treated as clean.

OSV dependency advisories

Published findings
Last query
1mo
Scanner
osv@v1
Stored findings
22
View source evidence

deps.dev advisories

Not queried
Scanner
deps.dev@v1
View source evidence

OpenSSF Scorecard

Not queried
Scanner
openssf-scorecard@v1

Weekly public scans omit some checks at scale.

View source evidence

Dependency advisories (deduplicated)

GHSA-5545-2q6w-2gh6
numpy@1.9.0 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
GHSA-6p56-wp2h-9hxr
numpy@1.9.0 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
GHSA-9fq2-x9r6-wfmf
numpy@1.9.0 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
GHSA-f7c7-j99h-c22f
numpy@1.9.0 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
GHSA-fpfv-jqm9-f5jm
numpy@1.9.0 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
GHSA-frgw-fgh6-9g52
numpy@1.9.0 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
PYSEC-2017-1
numpy@1.9.0 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
PYSEC-2019-108
numpy@1.9.0 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
PYSEC-2021-854
numpy@1.9.0 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
PYSEC-2021-855
numpy@1.9.0 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
PYSEC-2021-856
numpy@1.9.0 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
PYSEC-2021-857
numpy@1.9.0 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
PYSEC-2023-102
scipy@1.7.0 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
PYSEC-2023-114
scipy@1.7.0 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
GHSA-jw8x-6495-233v
scikit-learn@0.24.0 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
GHSA-jxfp-4rvq-9h9m
scikit-learn@0.24.0 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
PYSEC-2024-110
scikit-learn@0.24.0 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
GHSA-c336-7962-wfj2
distributed@2012.12 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
GHSA-hwqr-f3v9-hwxr
distributed@2012.12 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
PYSEC-2021-871
distributed@2012.12 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
PYSEC-2026-169
distributed@2012.12 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
PYSEC-2020-73
pandas@1.0 · osv@v1
requirements.txt

Method and caveats: these are sourced, dated heuristics from public GitHub data and external security intelligence providers. A status like "no published findings from this source" is not a guarantee of safety. Read the full trust methodology · JSON report at /api/graphcanon/tools/automl-auto-sklearn/trust.

Common questions

Is auto-sklearn maintained?
GraphCanon rates auto-sklearn "Steady" (60% maintenance signal from public GitHub metadata, computed 2w). Last push was 35 days ago. This is a recency heuristic, not a guarantee the project will stay maintained.
Is auto-sklearn safe to use?
Last scanned 1mo (deps profile). Status: 22 low - 22 low finding(s) in the latest scan. GraphCanon does not claim the project is safe or vulnerability-free; review findings on the trust report. GraphCanon does not certify auto-sklearn as safe - review maintenance, provenance, and scan findings on this page before adopting.
Is auto-sklearn a fork?
No. auto-sklearn is not flagged as a fork in GitHub metadata at the time of the last refresh.
Does auto-sklearn have known security vulnerabilities?
Last scanned 1mo (deps profile). Status: 22 low - 22 low finding(s) in the latest scan. GraphCanon does not claim the project is safe or vulnerability-free; review findings on the trust report.
How often is the auto-sklearn trust report updated?
Trust signals refresh on GitHub ingest/refresh cycles and optional dependency/MCP scans. This report was computed 2w (methodology github_public_v1).
What does GraphCanon never claim about auto-sklearn?
We never publish a composite safety grade, pen-test endorsement, or "verified secure" label for auto-sklearn. Signals are sourced heuristics with explicit limits - see trust methodology.
How does GraphCanon assess trust for auto-sklearn?
Signals are sourced from public GitHub metadata and optional dependency/MCP manifest scans, each tagged with methodology version and computed date. GraphCanon does not publish a composite safety grade. Read trust methodology for full scope and limits.

Was this helpful?

Anonymous feedback helps us improve pages and translations.