Home/vibe-jet/Trust report

Trust and health report

vibe-jet - trust report

Sourced, dated trust signals - maintenance label posture, repository provenance, and security scan status. Not a composite safety grade.

GraphCanon updated today · GitHub synced today

Maintenance

Recency and activity heuristics from public GitHub metadata (maintenance label, momentum); methodology: github_public_v1.

Dormant18% signal

last push 463d ago

Provenance

Repository identity and fork provenance (github_public_v1).

  • GitHub repo id: 956945371
  • Not a fork
  • Personal account
  • Computed today

Security intelligence

Source-by-source security scan results from public intelligence providers. Missing, partial, or failed queries are shown explicitly and are not treated as clean.

OSV dependency advisories

Published findings
Last query
today
Scanner
osv@v1
Stored findings
3
View source evidence

deps.dev advisories

Not queried
Scanner
deps.dev@v1
View source evidence

OpenSSF Scorecard

Not queried
Scanner
openssf-scorecard@v1

Weekly public scans omit some checks at scale.

View source evidence

Dependency advisories (deduplicated)

GHSA-w5hq-g745-h8pq
uuid@11.1.0 · osv@v1
package-lock.json
GHSA-58qx-3vcg-4xpx
ws@8.18.1 · osv@v1
package-lock.json
GHSA-96hv-2xvq-fx4p
ws@8.18.1 · osv@v1
package-lock.json

Method and caveats: these are sourced, dated heuristics from public GitHub data and external security intelligence providers. A status like "no published findings from this source" is not a guarantee of safety. Read the full trust methodology · JSON report at /api/graphcanon/tools/cedrickchee-vibe-jet/trust.

Common questions

Is vibe-jet maintained?
GraphCanon rates vibe-jet "Dormant" (18% maintenance signal from public GitHub metadata, computed today). Last push was 463 days ago. This is a recency heuristic, not a guarantee the project will stay maintained.
Is vibe-jet safe to use?
Last scanned today (deps profile). Status: 3 low - 3 low finding(s) in the latest scan. GraphCanon does not claim the project is safe or vulnerability-free; review findings on the trust report. GraphCanon does not certify vibe-jet as safe - review maintenance, provenance, and scan findings on this page before adopting.
Is vibe-jet a fork?
No. vibe-jet is not flagged as a fork in GitHub metadata at the time of the last refresh.
Does vibe-jet have known security vulnerabilities?
Last scanned today (deps profile). Status: 3 low - 3 low finding(s) in the latest scan. GraphCanon does not claim the project is safe or vulnerability-free; review findings on the trust report.
How often is the vibe-jet trust report updated?
Trust signals refresh on GitHub ingest/refresh cycles and optional dependency/MCP scans. This report was computed today (methodology github_public_v1).
What does GraphCanon never claim about vibe-jet?
We never publish a composite safety grade, pen-test endorsement, or "verified secure" label for vibe-jet. Signals are sourced heuristics with explicit limits - see trust methodology.
How does GraphCanon assess trust for vibe-jet?
Signals are sourced from public GitHub metadata and optional dependency/MCP manifest scans, each tagged with methodology version and computed date. GraphCanon does not publish a composite safety grade. Read trust methodology for full scope and limits.

Was this helpful?

Anonymous feedback helps us improve pages and translations.