Home/cordum/Trust report

Trust and health report

cordum - trust report

Sourced, dated trust signals - maintenance label posture, repository provenance, and security scan status. Not a composite safety grade.

GraphCanon updated 2w · GitHub synced 2w

Maintenance

Recency and activity heuristics from public GitHub metadata (maintenance label, momentum); methodology: github_public_v1.

Very active96% signal

last push 1d ago · last release 2mo · 3 releases (90d)

Provenance

Repository identity and fork provenance (github_public_v1).

Security intelligence

Source-by-source security scan results from public intelligence providers. Missing, partial, or failed queries are shown explicitly and are not treated as clean.

OSV dependency advisories

Published findings
Last query
1mo
Scanner
osv@v1
Stored findings
27
View source evidence

deps.dev advisories

Not queried
Scanner
deps.dev@v1
View source evidence

OpenSSF Scorecard

Not queried
Scanner
openssf-scorecard@v1

Weekly public scans omit some checks at scale.

View source evidence

Dependency advisories (deduplicated)

GHSA-45gg-vh54-h5m9
golang.org/x/crypto@v0.51.0 · osv@v1
go.sum
GHSA-5cgq-3rg8-m6cv
golang.org/x/crypto@v0.51.0 · osv@v1
go.sum
GHSA-78mq-xcr3-xm33
golang.org/x/crypto@v0.51.0 · osv@v1
go.sum
GHSA-89gr-r52h-f8rx
golang.org/x/crypto@v0.51.0 · osv@v1
go.sum
GHSA-9m57-25v3-79x9
golang.org/x/crypto@v0.51.0 · osv@v1
go.sum
GHSA-f5wc-c3c7-36mc
golang.org/x/crypto@v0.51.0 · osv@v1
go.sum
GHSA-jppx-rxg9-jmrx
golang.org/x/crypto@v0.51.0 · osv@v1
go.sum
GHSA-q4h4-gmj2-qvw2
golang.org/x/crypto@v0.51.0 · osv@v1
go.sum
GHSA-qpw4-5x99-6vjp
golang.org/x/crypto@v0.51.0 · osv@v1
go.sum
GHSA-rm3j-f69w-wqmq
golang.org/x/crypto@v0.51.0 · osv@v1
go.sum
GHSA-vgwf-h737-ff37
golang.org/x/crypto@v0.51.0 · osv@v1
go.sum
GHSA-w879-237q-wc7r
golang.org/x/crypto@v0.51.0 · osv@v1
go.sum
GHSA-x527-x647-q7gg
golang.org/x/crypto@v0.51.0 · osv@v1
go.sum
GO-2026-5005
golang.org/x/crypto@v0.51.0 · osv@v1
go.sum
GO-2026-5006
golang.org/x/crypto@v0.51.0 · osv@v1
go.sum
GO-2026-5013
golang.org/x/crypto@v0.51.0 · osv@v1
go.sum
GO-2026-5014
golang.org/x/crypto@v0.51.0 · osv@v1
go.sum
GO-2026-5015
golang.org/x/crypto@v0.51.0 · osv@v1
go.sum
GO-2026-5016
golang.org/x/crypto@v0.51.0 · osv@v1
go.sum
GO-2026-5017
golang.org/x/crypto@v0.51.0 · osv@v1
go.sum
GO-2026-5018
golang.org/x/crypto@v0.51.0 · osv@v1
go.sum
GO-2026-5019
golang.org/x/crypto@v0.51.0 · osv@v1
go.sum
GO-2026-5020
golang.org/x/crypto@v0.51.0 · osv@v1
go.sum
GO-2026-5021
golang.org/x/crypto@v0.51.0 · osv@v1
go.sum
GO-2026-5023
golang.org/x/crypto@v0.51.0 · osv@v1
go.sum
GO-2026-5033
golang.org/x/crypto@v0.51.0 · osv@v1
go.sum
GO-2026-5932
golang.org/x/crypto@v0.51.0 · osv@v1
go.sum

Method and caveats: these are sourced, dated heuristics from public GitHub data and external security intelligence providers. A status like "no published findings from this source" is not a guarantee of safety. Read the full trust methodology · JSON report at /api/graphcanon/tools/cordum-io-cordum/trust.

Common questions

Is cordum maintained?
GraphCanon rates cordum "Very active" (96% maintenance signal from public GitHub metadata, computed 2w). Last push was 1 days ago. 3 GitHub releases in the last 90 days. This is a recency heuristic, not a guarantee the project will stay maintained.
Is cordum safe to use?
Last scanned 1mo (deps profile). Status: 27 low - 27 low finding(s) in the latest scan. GraphCanon does not claim the project is safe or vulnerability-free; review findings on the trust report. GraphCanon does not certify cordum as safe - review maintenance, provenance, and scan findings on this page before adopting.
Is cordum a fork?
No. cordum is not flagged as a fork in GitHub metadata at the time of the last refresh.
Does cordum have known security vulnerabilities?
Last scanned 1mo (deps profile). Status: 27 low - 27 low finding(s) in the latest scan. GraphCanon does not claim the project is safe or vulnerability-free; review findings on the trust report.
How often is the cordum trust report updated?
Trust signals refresh on GitHub ingest/refresh cycles and optional dependency/MCP scans. This report was computed 2w (methodology github_public_v1).
What does GraphCanon never claim about cordum?
We never publish a composite safety grade, pen-test endorsement, or "verified secure" label for cordum. Signals are sourced heuristics with explicit limits - see trust methodology.
How does GraphCanon assess trust for cordum?
Signals are sourced from public GitHub metadata and optional dependency/MCP manifest scans, each tagged with methodology version and computed date. GraphCanon does not publish a composite safety grade. Read trust methodology for full scope and limits.

Was this helpful?

Anonymous feedback helps us improve pages and translations.