Trust and health report
llama.cpp - trust report
Sourced, dated trust signals - maintenance label posture, repository provenance, and security scan status. Not a composite safety grade.
GraphCanon updated 1w · GitHub synced 1w
Maintenance
Recency and activity heuristics from public GitHub metadata (maintenance label, momentum); methodology: github_public_v1.
last push 0d ago · last release 1w · 30 releases (90d)
+3.4k stars (30d) · +143 open issues (30d)
Provenance
Repository identity and fork provenance (github_public_v1).
- GitHub repo id: 612354784
- Not a fork
- Verified publisher: organization account
- Computed 1w
Security intelligence
Source-by-source security scan results from public intelligence providers. Missing, partial, or failed queries are shown explicitly and are not treated as clean.
OSV dependency advisories
No published findings from this source as of 2026-07-11- Last query
- 1mo
- Scanner
- osv@v1
OpenSSF Scorecard
Not queried- Scanner
- openssf-scorecard@v1
Weekly public scans omit some checks at scale.
View source evidenceMethod and caveats: these are sourced, dated heuristics from public GitHub data and external security intelligence providers. A status like "no published findings from this source" is not a guarantee of safety. Read the full trust methodology · JSON report at /api/graphcanon/tools/ggml-org-llama-cpp/trust.
Common questions
- Is llama.cpp maintained?
- GraphCanon rates llama.cpp "Very active" (96% maintenance signal from public GitHub metadata, computed 1w). Last push was 0 days ago. 30 GitHub releases in the last 90 days. This is a recency heuristic, not a guarantee the project will stay maintained.
- Is llama.cpp safe to use?
- Last scanned 1mo (deps profile). Status: No criticals. Absence of findings in our scan is not a security guarantee - see trust methodology for scope limits. GraphCanon does not certify llama.cpp as safe - review maintenance, provenance, and scan findings on this page before adopting.
- Is llama.cpp a fork?
- No. llama.cpp is not flagged as a fork in GitHub metadata at the time of the last refresh.
- Does llama.cpp have known security vulnerabilities?
- Last scanned 1mo (deps profile). Status: No criticals. Absence of findings in our scan is not a security guarantee - see trust methodology for scope limits.
- How often is the llama.cpp trust report updated?
- Trust signals refresh on GitHub ingest/refresh cycles and optional dependency/MCP scans. This report was computed 1w (methodology github_public_v1).
- What does GraphCanon never claim about llama.cpp?
- We never publish a composite safety grade, pen-test endorsement, or "verified secure" label for llama.cpp. Signals are sourced heuristics with explicit limits - see trust methodology.
- How does GraphCanon assess trust for llama.cpp?
- Signals are sourced from public GitHub metadata and optional dependency/MCP manifest scans, each tagged with methodology version and computed date. GraphCanon does not publish a composite safety grade. Read trust methodology for full scope and limits.