Home/AGiXT/Trust report

Trust and health report

AGiXT - trust report

Sourced, dated trust signals - maintenance label posture, repository provenance, and security scan status. Not a composite safety grade.

GraphCanon updated today · GitHub synced today

Maintenance

Recency and activity heuristics from public GitHub metadata (maintenance label, momentum); methodology: github_public_v1.

Active82% signal

last push 23d ago · last release 4mo

+5 stars (30d) · +1 open issues (30d)

Provenance

Repository identity and fork provenance (github_public_v1).

  • GitHub repo id: 629177820
  • Not a fork
  • Personal account
  • Computed today

Security intelligence

Source-by-source security scan results from public intelligence providers. Missing, partial, or failed queries are shown explicitly and are not treated as clean.

OSV dependency advisories

Published findings
Last query
1mo
Scanner
osv@v1
Stored findings
16
View source evidence

deps.dev advisories

Not queried
Scanner
deps.dev@v1
View source evidence

OpenSSF Scorecard

Not queried
Scanner
openssf-scorecard@v1

Weekly public scans omit some checks at scale.

View source evidence

Dependency advisories (deduplicated)

GHSA-537c-gmf6-5ccf
cryptography@46.0.7 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
GHSA-993g-76c3-p5m4
PyJWT@2.12.0 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
GHSA-fhv5-28vv-h8m8
PyJWT@2.12.0 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
GHSA-jq35-7prp-9v3f
PyJWT@2.12.0 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
GHSA-w7vc-732c-9m39
PyJWT@2.12.0 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
GHSA-xgmm-8j9v-c9wx
PyJWT@2.12.0 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
PYSEC-2026-175
PyJWT@2.12.0 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
PYSEC-2026-176
PyJWT@2.12.0 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
PYSEC-2026-177
PyJWT@2.12.0 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
PYSEC-2026-178
PyJWT@2.12.0 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
PYSEC-2026-179
PyJWT@2.12.0 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
GHSA-5rvq-cxj2-64vf
python-multipart@0.0.27 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
GHSA-6jv3-5f52-599m
python-multipart@0.0.27 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
GHSA-v9pg-7xvm-68hf
python-multipart@0.0.27 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
GHSA-vffw-93wf-4j4q
python-multipart@0.0.27 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
GHSA-mrfv-m5wm-5w6w
PyNaCl@1.5.0 · osv@v1
requirements.txt

Method and caveats: these are sourced, dated heuristics from public GitHub data and external security intelligence providers. A status like "no published findings from this source" is not a guarantee of safety. Read the full trust methodology · JSON report at /api/graphcanon/tools/josh-xt-agixt/trust.

Common questions

Is AGiXT maintained?
GraphCanon rates AGiXT "Active" (82% maintenance signal from public GitHub metadata, computed today). Last push was 23 days ago. This is a recency heuristic, not a guarantee the project will stay maintained.
Is AGiXT safe to use?
Last scanned 1mo (deps profile). Status: 16 low - 16 low finding(s) in the latest scan. GraphCanon does not claim the project is safe or vulnerability-free; review findings on the trust report. GraphCanon does not certify AGiXT as safe - review maintenance, provenance, and scan findings on this page before adopting.
Is AGiXT a fork?
No. AGiXT is not flagged as a fork in GitHub metadata at the time of the last refresh.
Does AGiXT have known security vulnerabilities?
Last scanned 1mo (deps profile). Status: 16 low - 16 low finding(s) in the latest scan. GraphCanon does not claim the project is safe or vulnerability-free; review findings on the trust report.
How often is the AGiXT trust report updated?
Trust signals refresh on GitHub ingest/refresh cycles and optional dependency/MCP scans. This report was computed today (methodology github_public_v1).
What does GraphCanon never claim about AGiXT?
We never publish a composite safety grade, pen-test endorsement, or "verified secure" label for AGiXT. Signals are sourced heuristics with explicit limits - see trust methodology.
How does GraphCanon assess trust for AGiXT?
Signals are sourced from public GitHub metadata and optional dependency/MCP manifest scans, each tagged with methodology version and computed date. GraphCanon does not publish a composite safety grade. Read trust methodology for full scope and limits.

Was this helpful?

Anonymous feedback helps us improve pages and translations.