Home/wllama/Trust report

Trust and health report

wllama - trust report

Sourced, dated trust signals - maintenance label posture, repository provenance, and security scan status. Not a composite safety grade.

GraphCanon updated today · GitHub synced today

Maintenance

Recency and activity heuristics from public GitHub metadata (maintenance label, momentum); methodology: github_public_v1.

Active82% signal

last push 23d ago · last release 3w · 10 releases (90d)

Provenance

Repository identity and fork provenance (github_public_v1).

  • GitHub repo id: 771771112
  • Not a fork
  • Personal account
  • Computed today

Security scan

Dependency advisory security scan when a lockfile is present. Not a full code audit.

Status
9 low
Last scan
today
Scanner
osv@v1

Findings

GHSA-968p-4wvh-cqc8
@babel/runtime@7.26.0 · package-lock.json
GHSA-8gvc-j273-4wm5
@vitest/browser@2.1.6 · package-lock.json
GHSA-5rq4-664w-9x2c
basic-ftp@5.0.5 · package-lock.json
GHSA-6v7q-wjvx-w8wg
basic-ftp@5.0.5 · package-lock.json
GHSA-rp42-5vxx-qpwr
basic-ftp@5.0.5 · package-lock.json
GHSA-rpmf-866q-6p89
basic-ftp@5.0.5 · package-lock.json
GHSA-qwcr-r2fm-qrc7
body-parser@1.20.2 · package-lock.json
GHSA-f886-m6hf-6m8v
brace-expansion@2.0.1 · package-lock.json
GHSA-v6h2-p8h4-qcjw
brace-expansion@2.0.1 · package-lock.json

Method and caveats:these are sourced, dated heuristics from public GitHub data and optional dependency scans. A status like "no criticals found on 2026-07-11" is not a guarantee of safety. Read the full trust methodology · JSON report at /api/graphcanon/tools/ngxson-wllama/trust.

Common questions

Is wllama maintained?
GraphCanon rates wllama "Active" (82% maintenance signal from public GitHub metadata, computed today). Last push was 23 days ago. 10 GitHub releases in the last 90 days. This is a recency heuristic, not a guarantee the project will stay maintained.
Is wllama safe to use?
Last scanned today (deps profile). Status: 9 low - 9 low finding(s) in the latest scan. GraphCanon does not claim the project is safe or vulnerability-free; review findings on the trust report. GraphCanon does not certify wllama as safe - review maintenance, provenance, and scan findings on this page before adopting.
Is wllama a fork?
No. wllama is not flagged as a fork in GitHub metadata at the time of the last refresh.
Does wllama have known security vulnerabilities?
Last scanned today (deps profile). Status: 9 low - 9 low finding(s) in the latest scan. GraphCanon does not claim the project is safe or vulnerability-free; review findings on the trust report.
How often is the wllama trust report updated?
Trust signals refresh on GitHub ingest/refresh cycles and optional dependency/MCP scans. This report was computed today (methodology github_public_v1).
What does GraphCanon never claim about wllama?
We never publish a composite safety grade, pen-test endorsement, or "verified secure" label for wllama. Signals are sourced heuristics with explicit limits - see trust methodology.
How does GraphCanon assess trust for wllama?
Signals are sourced from public GitHub metadata and optional dependency/MCP manifest scans, each tagged with methodology version and computed date. GraphCanon does not publish a composite safety grade. Read trust methodology for full scope and limits.