Home/Data & Retrieval/EnterpriseRAG-Bench
EnterpriseRAG-Bench logo

EnterpriseRAG-Bench

onyx-dot-app/EnterpriseRAG-Bench

Dataset and benchmark for RAG on company internal documents

GraphCanon updated 3w · GitHub synced 3w · 36 views this month

489 stars52 forksLast push 3mo MIT

Decision brief

EnterpriseRAG-Bench specializes in benchmarking RAG models on company internal documents, offering specific evaluation metrics for enterprise-level data.

Good fit when

  • When you need to evaluate retrieval-augmented generation models specifically for processing extensive and complex enterprise documentation
  • If your project includes the creation of custom synthetic data tailored for enterprise scenarios

Avoid when

  • Avoid if your focus is on general web or public-domain document benchmarking, as EnterpriseRAG-Bench is tuned exclusively for company internal documents
  • Do not use if you require a solution that supports languages other than those implied by the existing dataset without further customization

Observed Jul 17, 2026 · Source: enrich:decision_facts

Verify the decision

Maintenance and security

Full trust report
Maintenance
Steady (81d since push)
As of 3w
Provenance
Not a fork · Organization account
As of 3w
Security (OSV)
No lockfile
As of 1mo

Public GitHub metadata and optional OSV scans. Signals, not a guarantee. Trust methodology.

Install

git clone https://github.com/onyx-dot-app/EnterpriseRAG-Bench

Similar tools

Same-category neighbours. No typed graph edges are catalogued for this tool yet.

Evidence and technical details

Sourced facts, taxonomy, compatibility claims, README excerpt, and machine-readable endpoints.

Overview

Provides test data and evaluation metrics for retrieval-augmented generation models specifically tailored towards processing enterprise-level documentation.

Capability facts

Languages
python

Source: github.language+pyproject.toml · Jul 28, 2026

Categories

Tags

README

EnterpriseRAG-Bench

Leaderboard Dataset license website arXiv

📖 Overview

EnterpriseRAG Bench provides a dataset for company internal documents consisting of slightly over 500,000 documents and 500 questions. We release this dataset to help teams benchmark their RAG systems and fine-tune agents on realistic enterprise data. The code additionally provides a way of generating similar datasets for different industries, scales of companies, etc.

[!NOTE] See here for the latest leaderboard rankings.

The dataset simulates a company called "Redwood Inference" that provides AI model inference as a service.

The data sources and approximate volumes are as follows:

#Source TypeApproximate VolumeSource Description
1Slack275,000Internal channels and team discussions.
2Gmail120,000Email threads from management, sales, leadership, and ICs.
3Linear35,000Project management tickets for eng, product, and design.
4Google Drive25,000Shared files and collaborative documents.
5Hubspot15,000CRM records for sales.
6Fireflies10,000Meeting transcripts for both internal and external facing meetings.
7GitHub8,000Pull requests and comments across different code repositories.
8Jira6,000Support tickets, both internal and customer facing.
9Confluence5,000Wikis, runbooks, and structured/polished documentation.

The corpus provides broad coverage across key areas of business activity including (but not limited to) planning, engineering, documentation, sales, customer success, internal discussions, emails, and more.

The questions are broken up into 10 categories:

#CategoryCountDescription
1Basic175Simple questions with a single ground truth document.
2Semantic125Similar to Basic but more roundabout, with less keyword/phrase overlap and without giveaway-type keywords.
3Intra-Document Reasoning40Requires combining information from several distant sections of a single longer document.
4Project Related40Aggregate knowledge from related documents from a single project/initiative within the company.
5Constrained30Questions with multiple relevant documents but with qualifiers that disqualify all but one answer.
6Conflicting Info20Questions where documents directly contradict each other. Requires the system to give a complete and correct answer.
7Completeness20Questions that require fetching all relevant documents (no more than 10) to be able to provide a correct answer.
8Miscellaneous20Questions targeting informal, off-topic, or loosely organized documents.
9High Level10High level questions where the answer is not located in any single document.
Note: these do not have any ground truth documents.
10Info Not Found20Questions where the answer is not available.
Note: these do not have any ground truth documents.

No

For agents

This page has a .md twin and JSON over the API.

Was this helpful?

Anonymous feedback helps us improve pages and translations.