Home/intellagent/Trust report

Trust and health report

intellagent - trust report

Sourced, dated trust signals - maintenance label posture, repository provenance, and security scan status. Not a composite safety grade.

GraphCanon updated 1d · GitHub synced 1d

Maintenance

Recency and activity heuristics from public GitHub metadata (maintenance label, momentum); methodology: github_public_v1.

Steady60% signal

last push 37d ago · last release 1y

+1 stars (30d) · +2 open issues (30d)

Provenance

Repository identity and fork provenance (github_public_v1).

Security intelligence

Source-by-source security scan results from public intelligence providers. Missing, partial, or failed queries are shown explicitly and are not treated as clean.

OSV dependency advisories

Published findings
Last query
1mo
Scanner
osv@v1
Stored findings
19
View source evidence

deps.dev advisories

Not queried
Scanner
deps.dev@v1
View source evidence

OpenSSF Scorecard

Not queried
Scanner
openssf-scorecard@v1

Weekly public scans omit some checks at scale.

View source evidence

Dependency advisories (deduplicated)

GHSA-wh2j-26j7-9728
google-cloud-aiplatform@1.75.0 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
GHSA-3644-q5cj-c5c7
langchain@0.3.7 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
GHSA-gr75-jv2w-4656
langchain@0.3.7 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
GHSA-2g6r-c272-w58r
langchain_core@0.3.15 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
GHSA-6qv9-48xg-fc7f
langchain_core@0.3.15 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
GHSA-926x-3r5x-gfhw
langchain_core@0.3.15 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
GHSA-c67j-w6g6-q2cm
langchain_core@0.3.15 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
GHSA-pjwx-r37v-7724
langchain_core@0.3.15 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
GHSA-qh6h-p6c9-ff54
langchain_core@0.3.15 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
PYSEC-2026-1518
langchain_core@0.3.15 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
PYSEC-2026-373
langchain_core@0.3.15 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
GHSA-r7w7-9xr2-qq2r
langchain_openai@0.2.5 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
PYSEC-2026-76
langchain_openai@0.2.5 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
GHSA-g48c-2wqr-h844
langgraph@0.2.44 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
PYSEC-2026-83
langgraph@0.2.44 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
GHSA-pc6w-59fv-rh23
langchain_community@0.3.5 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
PYSEC-2026-1515
langchain_community@0.3.5 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
GHSA-7p48-42j8-8846
streamlit@1.39.0 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
PYSEC-2026-212
streamlit@1.39.0 · osv@v1
requirements.txt

Method and caveats: these are sourced, dated heuristics from public GitHub data and external security intelligence providers. A status like "no published findings from this source" is not a guarantee of safety. Read the full trust methodology · JSON report at /api/graphcanon/tools/plurai-ai-intellagent/trust.

Common questions

Is intellagent maintained?
GraphCanon rates intellagent "Steady" (60% maintenance signal from public GitHub metadata, computed 1d). Last push was 37 days ago. This is a recency heuristic, not a guarantee the project will stay maintained.
Is intellagent safe to use?
Last scanned 1mo (deps profile). Status: 19 low - 19 low finding(s) in the latest scan. GraphCanon does not claim the project is safe or vulnerability-free; review findings on the trust report. GraphCanon does not certify intellagent as safe - review maintenance, provenance, and scan findings on this page before adopting.
Is intellagent a fork?
No. intellagent is not flagged as a fork in GitHub metadata at the time of the last refresh.
Does intellagent have known security vulnerabilities?
Last scanned 1mo (deps profile). Status: 19 low - 19 low finding(s) in the latest scan. GraphCanon does not claim the project is safe or vulnerability-free; review findings on the trust report.
How often is the intellagent trust report updated?
Trust signals refresh on GitHub ingest/refresh cycles and optional dependency/MCP scans. This report was computed 1d (methodology github_public_v1).
What does GraphCanon never claim about intellagent?
We never publish a composite safety grade, pen-test endorsement, or "verified secure" label for intellagent. Signals are sourced heuristics with explicit limits - see trust methodology.
How does GraphCanon assess trust for intellagent?
Signals are sourced from public GitHub metadata and optional dependency/MCP manifest scans, each tagged with methodology version and computed date. GraphCanon does not publish a composite safety grade. Read trust methodology for full scope and limits.

Was this helpful?

Anonymous feedback helps us improve pages and translations.