tree-of-thought-llm - trust report

Common questions

Is tree-of-thought-llm maintained?

GraphCanon rates tree-of-thought-llm "Dormant" (18% maintenance signal from public GitHub metadata, computed 4d). Last push was 577 days ago. This is a recency heuristic, not a guarantee the project will stay maintained.

Is tree-of-thought-llm safe to use?

Last scanned 1mo (deps profile). Status: 90 low - 90 low finding(s) in the latest scan. GraphCanon does not claim the project is safe or vulnerability-free; review findings on the trust report. GraphCanon does not certify tree-of-thought-llm as safe - review maintenance, provenance, and scan findings on this page before adopting.

Is tree-of-thought-llm a fork?

No. tree-of-thought-llm is not flagged as a fork in GitHub metadata at the time of the last refresh.

Does tree-of-thought-llm have known security vulnerabilities?

Last scanned 1mo (deps profile). Status: 90 low - 90 low finding(s) in the latest scan. GraphCanon does not claim the project is safe or vulnerability-free; review findings on the trust report.

How often is the tree-of-thought-llm trust report updated?

Trust signals refresh on GitHub ingest/refresh cycles and optional dependency/MCP scans. This report was computed 4d (methodology github_public_v1).

What does GraphCanon never claim about tree-of-thought-llm?

We never publish a composite safety grade, pen-test endorsement, or "verified secure" label for tree-of-thought-llm. Signals are sourced heuristics with explicit limits - see trust methodology.

How does GraphCanon assess trust for tree-of-thought-llm?

Signals are sourced from public GitHub metadata and optional dependency/MCP manifest scans, each tagged with methodology version and computed date. GraphCanon does not publish a composite safety grade. Read trust methodology for full scope and limits.