Trust and health report
cua - trust report
Sourced, dated trust signals - maintenance label posture, repository provenance, and security scan status. Not a composite safety grade.
GraphCanon updated 1mo · GitHub synced 1mo
Maintenance
Recency and activity heuristics from public GitHub metadata (maintenance label, momentum); methodology: github_public_v1.
last push 0d ago · last release 1mo · 30 releases (90d)
Provenance
Repository identity and fork provenance (github_public_v1).
- GitHub repo id: 925270205
- Not a fork
- Verified publisher: organization account
- Computed 1mo
Security intelligence
Source-by-source security scan results from public intelligence providers. Missing, partial, or failed queries are shown explicitly and are not treated as clean.
OSV dependency advisories
No published findings from this source as of 2026-07-11- Last query
- 1mo
- Scanner
- osv@v1
OpenSSF Scorecard
Not queried- Scanner
- openssf-scorecard@v1
Weekly public scans omit some checks at scale.
View source evidenceMethod and caveats: these are sourced, dated heuristics from public GitHub data and external security intelligence providers. A status like "no published findings from this source" is not a guarantee of safety. Read the full trust methodology · JSON report at /api/graphcanon/tools/trycua-cua/trust.
Common questions
- Is cua maintained?
- GraphCanon rates cua "Very active" (96% maintenance signal from public GitHub metadata, computed 1mo). Last push was 0 days ago. 30 GitHub releases in the last 90 days. This is a recency heuristic, not a guarantee the project will stay maintained.
- Is cua safe to use?
- Last scanned 1mo (mcp_manifest profile). Status: 2 low - 2 low finding(s) in the latest scan. GraphCanon does not claim the project is safe or vulnerability-free; review findings on the trust report. GraphCanon does not certify cua as safe - review maintenance, provenance, and scan findings on this page before adopting.
- Is cua a fork?
- No. cua is not flagged as a fork in GitHub metadata at the time of the last refresh.
- Does cua have known security vulnerabilities?
- Last scanned 1mo (mcp_manifest profile). Status: 2 low - 2 low finding(s) in the latest scan. GraphCanon does not claim the project is safe or vulnerability-free; review findings on the trust report.
- How often is the cua trust report updated?
- Trust signals refresh on GitHub ingest/refresh cycles and optional dependency/MCP scans. This report was computed 1mo (methodology github_public_v1).
- What does GraphCanon never claim about cua?
- We never publish a composite safety grade, pen-test endorsement, or "verified secure" label for cua. Signals are sourced heuristics with explicit limits - see trust methodology.
- How does GraphCanon assess trust for cua?
- Signals are sourced from public GitHub metadata and optional dependency/MCP manifest scans, each tagged with methodology version and computed date. GraphCanon does not publish a composite safety grade. Read trust methodology for full scope and limits.