Home/exllama/Trust report

Trust and health report

exllama - trust report

Sourced, dated trust signals - maintenance label posture, repository provenance, and security scan status. Not a composite safety grade.

GraphCanon updated 2w · GitHub synced 2w

Maintenance

Recency and activity heuristics from public GitHub metadata (maintenance label, momentum); methodology: github_public_v1.

Dormant18% signal

last push 1041d ago

Provenance

Repository identity and fork provenance (github_public_v1).

  • GitHub repo id: 636467087
  • Not a fork
  • Personal account
  • Computed 2w

Security intelligence

Source-by-source security scan results from public intelligence providers. Missing, partial, or failed queries are shown explicitly and are not treated as clean.

OSV dependency advisories

Published findings
Last query
1mo
Scanner
osv@v1
Stored findings
29
View source evidence

deps.dev advisories

Not queried
Scanner
deps.dev@v1
View source evidence

OpenSSF Scorecard

Not queried
Scanner
openssf-scorecard@v1

Weekly public scans omit some checks at scale.

View source evidence

Dependency advisories (deduplicated)

GHSA-3749-ghw9-m3mg
torch@2.0.1 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
GHSA-53q9-r3pm-6pq6
torch@2.0.1 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
GHSA-5pcm-hx3q-hm94
torch@2.0.1 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
GHSA-887c-mr87-cxwp
torch@2.0.1 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
GHSA-c678-jfcj-6jmf
torch@2.0.1 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
GHSA-f4hp-rmr7-r7v8
torch@2.0.1 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
GHSA-pg7h-5qx3-wjr3
torch@2.0.1 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
GHSA-qfhq-4f3w-5fph
torch@2.0.1 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
GHSA-rrmf-rvhw-rf47
torch@2.0.1 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
GHSA-vgrw-7cvw-pwgx
torch@2.0.1 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
GHSA-x3gm-94wq-g975
torch@2.0.1 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
PYSEC-2024-250
torch@2.0.1 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
PYSEC-2024-251
torch@2.0.1 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
PYSEC-2024-252
torch@2.0.1 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
PYSEC-2024-259
torch@2.0.1 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
PYSEC-2025-191
torch@2.0.1 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
PYSEC-2025-198
torch@2.0.1 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
PYSEC-2025-203
torch@2.0.1 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
PYSEC-2025-204
torch@2.0.1 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
PYSEC-2025-205
torch@2.0.1 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
PYSEC-2025-206
torch@2.0.1 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
PYSEC-2025-207
torch@2.0.1 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
PYSEC-2025-208
torch@2.0.1 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
PYSEC-2025-209
torch@2.0.1 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
PYSEC-2025-41
torch@2.0.1 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
PYSEC-2026-139
torch@2.0.1 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
PYSEC-2026-1970
torch@2.0.1 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
GHSA-38vq-g6vr-w8wf
sentencepiece@0.1.97 · osv@v1
requirements.txt
PYSEC-2026-1909
sentencepiece@0.1.97 · osv@v1
requirements.txt

Method and caveats: these are sourced, dated heuristics from public GitHub data and external security intelligence providers. A status like "no published findings from this source" is not a guarantee of safety. Read the full trust methodology · JSON report at /api/graphcanon/tools/turboderp-exllama/trust.

Common questions

Is exllama maintained?
GraphCanon rates exllama "Dormant" (18% maintenance signal from public GitHub metadata, computed 2w). Last push was 1041 days ago. This is a recency heuristic, not a guarantee the project will stay maintained.
Is exllama safe to use?
Last scanned 1mo (deps profile). Status: 29 low - 29 low finding(s) in the latest scan. GraphCanon does not claim the project is safe or vulnerability-free; review findings on the trust report. GraphCanon does not certify exllama as safe - review maintenance, provenance, and scan findings on this page before adopting.
Is exllama a fork?
No. exllama is not flagged as a fork in GitHub metadata at the time of the last refresh.
Does exllama have known security vulnerabilities?
Last scanned 1mo (deps profile). Status: 29 low - 29 low finding(s) in the latest scan. GraphCanon does not claim the project is safe or vulnerability-free; review findings on the trust report.
How often is the exllama trust report updated?
Trust signals refresh on GitHub ingest/refresh cycles and optional dependency/MCP scans. This report was computed 2w (methodology github_public_v1).
What does GraphCanon never claim about exllama?
We never publish a composite safety grade, pen-test endorsement, or "verified secure" label for exllama. Signals are sourced heuristics with explicit limits - see trust methodology.
How does GraphCanon assess trust for exllama?
Signals are sourced from public GitHub metadata and optional dependency/MCP manifest scans, each tagged with methodology version and computed date. GraphCanon does not publish a composite safety grade. Read trust methodology for full scope and limits.

Was this helpful?

Anonymous feedback helps us improve pages and translations.