Home/Compare/code-eval vs bigcode-evaluation-harness

Comparison

code-eval vs bigcode-evaluation-harness

Verdict

Pick code-eval if code-eval assesses large language models with the human-eval benchmark to provide insights into code generation reliability; pick bigcode-evaluation-harness if bigcode-evaluation-harness is tailored towards evaluating autoregressive code generation models via Python and Docker containers for secure and reproducible execution environments.

Markdown twin · code-eval alternatives · bigcode-evaluation-harness alternatives

GraphCanon updated 2w

code-eval logo

code-eval

abacaj/code-eval

431pushed Sep 12, 2023
vs
bigcode-evaluation-harness logo

bigcode-evaluation-harness

bigcode-project/bigcode-evaluation-harness

1.1kpushed Jul 22, 2025

Trust & integrity

Signalcode-evalbigcode-evaluation-harness
Maintenance
Dormant (1058d since push)
As of 2w · github_public_v1
Dormant (378d since push)
As of 2w · github_public_v1
Provenance
Not a fork · Personal account
As of 2w · github_public_v1
Not a fork · Organization account
As of 2w · github_public_v1
OSV dependency advisories
Published findings
As of 1mo · osv@v1
Published findings
As of 1mo · osv@v1
deps.dev advisories
Not queried
deps.dev@v1
Not queried
deps.dev@v1
OpenSSF Scorecard
Not queried
openssf-scorecard@v1
Not queried
openssf-scorecard@v1

Tagline

code-eval
Run evaluation on LLMs using human-eval benchmark.
bigcode-evaluation-harness
A framework for evaluating autoregressive code generation language models.

Stars

code-eval
431
bigcode-evaluation-harness
1.1k

Forks

code-eval
37
bigcode-evaluation-harness
261

Open issues

code-eval
5
bigcode-evaluation-harness
96

Language

code-eval
Python
bigcode-evaluation-harness
Python

Adopt for

code-eval
code-eval assesses large language models with the human-eval benchmark to provide insights into code generation reliability.
bigcode-evaluation-harness
bigcode-evaluation-harness is tailored towards evaluating autoregressive code generation models via Python and Docker containers for secure and reproducible execution environments.

Persona

code-eval
-
bigcode-evaluation-harness
-

Runtime

code-eval
-
bigcode-evaluation-harness
-

License

code-eval
MIT
bigcode-evaluation-harness
bigcode-evaluation-harness is distributed under the Apache-2.0 license.

Last pushed

code-eval
Sep 12, 2023
bigcode-evaluation-harness
Jul 22, 2025

Categories

code-eval
Evaluation & Observability
bigcode-evaluation-harness
Evaluation & Observability

Trust and health

Days since push

code-eval
1058d
bigcode-evaluation-harness
378d

Open issues (now)

code-eval
5
bigcode-evaluation-harness
96

Owner type

code-eval
User
bigcode-evaluation-harness
Organization

Full report

code-eval
Trust report
bigcode-evaluation-harness
Trust report

Choose code-eval if…

  • License: code-eval is MIT, bigcode-evaluation-harness is Apache-2.0.
  • Tags unique to code-eval: humaneval, wizardcoder.
  • When you need clear comparisons of pass rates for different LLMs using standardized tests

When NOT to use code-eval

  • If the tool's results do not correlate well with the official published benchmarks due to unknown prompt differences
  • For real-time or dynamic evaluations as this repo offers pre-computed static results only

Choose bigcode-evaluation-harness if…

  • License: bigcode-evaluation-harness is Apache-2.0, code-eval is MIT.
  • Requirements: Users must have Docker installed to leverage the isolated execution environments for model output evaluation..
  • Tags unique to bigcode-evaluation-harness: autoregressive models, code generation, docker, python.
  • bigcode-evaluation-harness ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment.
  • When you need to isolate the evaluation environment from your local development setup, ensuring that no external variables affect the outcomes of model performance assessments.

When NOT to use bigcode-evaluation-harness

  • When you require real-time evaluation without the overhead of generating outputs locally and then evaluating them within isolated environments via Docker.
  • If your model's evaluation process does not necessitate autoregressive setup or the security features provided by Docker, using bigcode-evaluation-harness might introduce unnecessary complexity.

Explore

Sources

Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.

GitHub stars on cards: code-eval 431 · bigcode-evaluation-harness 1.1k (synced Aug 5, 2026).

Common questions

What is the difference between code-eval and bigcode-evaluation-harness?
code-eval: Run evaluation on LLMs using human-eval benchmark.. bigcode-evaluation-harness: A framework for evaluating autoregressive code generation language models.. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
When should I choose code-eval over bigcode-evaluation-harness?
Choose code-eval over bigcode-evaluation-harness when License: code-eval is MIT, bigcode-evaluation-harness is Apache-2.0; Tags unique to code-eval: humaneval, wizardcoder; When you need clear comparisons of pass rates for different LLMs using standardized tests.
When should I choose bigcode-evaluation-harness over code-eval?
Choose bigcode-evaluation-harness over code-eval when License: bigcode-evaluation-harness is Apache-2.0, code-eval is MIT; Requirements: Users must have Docker installed to leverage the isolated execution environments for model output evaluation.; Tags unique to bigcode-evaluation-harness: autoregressive models, code generation, docker, python; bigcode-evaluation-harness ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment; When you need to isolate the evaluation environment from your local development setup, ensuring that no external variables affect the outcomes of model performance assessments.
When should I avoid code-eval?
If the tool's results do not correlate well with the official published benchmarks due to unknown prompt differences For real-time or dynamic evaluations as this repo offers pre-computed static results only
When should I avoid bigcode-evaluation-harness?
When you require real-time evaluation without the overhead of generating outputs locally and then evaluating them within isolated environments via Docker. If your model's evaluation process does not necessitate autoregressive setup or the security features provided by Docker, using bigcode-evaluation-harness might introduce unnecessary complexity.
Is code-eval or bigcode-evaluation-harness more popular on GitHub?
bigcode-evaluation-harness has more GitHub stars (1,055 vs 431). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
Are code-eval and bigcode-evaluation-harness open source?
Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (code-eval: MIT, bigcode-evaluation-harness: Apache-2.0).
Where can I find alternatives to code-eval or bigcode-evaluation-harness?
GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at code-eval alternatives and bigcode-evaluation-harness alternatives (code-eval markdown twin, bigcode-evaluation-harness markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
Which is better maintained, code-eval or bigcode-evaluation-harness?
code-eval: Dormant. bigcode-evaluation-harness: Dormant. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
Where are the full trust reports for code-eval and bigcode-evaluation-harness?
GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: code-eval trust report; bigcode-evaluation-harness trust report.

Was this helpful?

Anonymous feedback helps us improve pages and translations.