Home/Compare/code-eval vs auto-evaluator

Comparison

code-eval vs auto-evaluator

Verdict

Pick code-eval when code-eval is primarily Python; auto-evaluator is TypeScript; pick auto-evaluator when auto-evaluator is primarily TypeScript; code-eval is Python.

Markdown twin · code-eval alternatives · auto-evaluator alternatives

GraphCanon updated 2w

code-eval logo

code-eval

abacaj/code-eval

431pushed Sep 12, 2023
vs
auto-evaluator logo

auto-evaluator

langchain-ai/auto-evaluator

783pushed Jun 26, 2025

Trust & integrity

Signalcode-evalauto-evaluator
Maintenance
Dormant (1058d since push)
As of 2w · github_public_v1
Archived (408d since push)
As of 2w · github_public_v1
Provenance
Not a fork · Personal account
As of 2w · github_public_v1
Not a fork · Organization account
As of 2w · github_public_v1
OSV dependency advisories
Published findings
As of 1mo · osv@v1
No lockfile (source not queried)
As of 1mo · osv@v1
deps.dev advisories
Not queried
deps.dev@v1
Not queried
deps.dev@v1
OpenSSF Scorecard
Not queried
openssf-scorecard@v1
Not queried
openssf-scorecard@v1

Tagline

code-eval
Run evaluation on LLMs using human-eval benchmark.
auto-evaluator
auto-evaluator

Stars

code-eval
431
auto-evaluator
783

Forks

code-eval
37
auto-evaluator
102

Open issues

code-eval
5
auto-evaluator
21

Language

code-eval
Python
auto-evaluator
TypeScript

Adopt for

code-eval
code-eval assesses large language models with the human-eval benchmark to provide insights into code generation reliability.
auto-evaluator
-

Persona

code-eval
-
auto-evaluator
-

Runtime

code-eval
-
auto-evaluator
-

License

code-eval
MIT
auto-evaluator
Other

Last pushed

code-eval
Sep 12, 2023
auto-evaluator
Jun 26, 2025

Categories

code-eval
Evaluation & Observability
auto-evaluator
Evaluation & Observability

Trust and health

Maintenance

code-eval
Dormant (18%)
auto-evaluator
Archived (8%)

Days since push

code-eval
1058d
auto-evaluator
408d

Archived on GitHub

code-eval
No
auto-evaluator
Yes

Open issues (now)

code-eval
5
auto-evaluator
21

Owner type

code-eval
User
auto-evaluator
Organization

OSV dependency advisories

code-eval
Published findings
auto-evaluator
No lockfile (source not queried)

Full report

code-eval
Trust report
auto-evaluator
Trust report

Choose code-eval if…

  • code-eval is primarily Python; auto-evaluator is TypeScript.
  • License: code-eval is MIT, auto-evaluator is Other.
  • Tags unique to code-eval: humaneval, wizardcoder.
  • When you need clear comparisons of pass rates for different LLMs using standardized tests

When NOT to use code-eval

  • If the tool's results do not correlate well with the official published benchmarks due to unknown prompt differences
  • For real-time or dynamic evaluations as this repo offers pre-computed static results only

Choose auto-evaluator if…

  • auto-evaluator is primarily TypeScript; code-eval is Python.
  • License: auto-evaluator is Other, code-eval is MIT.
  • Tags unique to auto-evaluator: auto-evaluation, railway, typescript, vercel.
  • Use auto-evaluator when you are working with TypeScript and need an integrated solution for evaluating AI models

When NOT to use auto-evaluator

  • Avoid using auto-evaluator if you require a multi-language support environment, as it focuses solely on TypeScript
  • Do not use this tool if your project's hosting requirements do not align with using Vercel or Railway

Explore

Sources

Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.

GitHub stars on cards: code-eval 431 · auto-evaluator 783 (synced Aug 5, 2026).

Common questions

What is the difference between code-eval and auto-evaluator?
code-eval: Run evaluation on LLMs using human-eval benchmark.. auto-evaluator: auto-evaluator. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
When should I choose code-eval over auto-evaluator?
Choose code-eval over auto-evaluator when code-eval is primarily Python; auto-evaluator is TypeScript; License: code-eval is MIT, auto-evaluator is Other; Tags unique to code-eval: humaneval, wizardcoder; When you need clear comparisons of pass rates for different LLMs using standardized tests.
When should I choose auto-evaluator over code-eval?
Choose auto-evaluator over code-eval when auto-evaluator is primarily TypeScript; code-eval is Python; License: auto-evaluator is Other, code-eval is MIT; Tags unique to auto-evaluator: auto-evaluation, railway, typescript, vercel; Use auto-evaluator when you are working with TypeScript and need an integrated solution for evaluating AI models.
When should I avoid code-eval?
If the tool's results do not correlate well with the official published benchmarks due to unknown prompt differences For real-time or dynamic evaluations as this repo offers pre-computed static results only
When should I avoid auto-evaluator?
Avoid using auto-evaluator if you require a multi-language support environment, as it focuses solely on TypeScript Do not use this tool if your project's hosting requirements do not align with using Vercel or Railway
Is code-eval or auto-evaluator more popular on GitHub?
auto-evaluator has more GitHub stars (783 vs 431). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
Are code-eval and auto-evaluator open source?
Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (code-eval: MIT, auto-evaluator: Other).
Where can I find alternatives to code-eval or auto-evaluator?
GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at code-eval alternatives and auto-evaluator alternatives (code-eval markdown twin, auto-evaluator markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
Which is better maintained, code-eval or auto-evaluator?
code-eval: Dormant. auto-evaluator: Archived. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
Where are the full trust reports for code-eval and auto-evaluator?
GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: code-eval trust report; auto-evaluator trust report.

Was this helpful?

Anonymous feedback helps us improve pages and translations.