Comparison
code-eval vs lever
Verdict
Pick code-eval if code-eval assesses large language models with the human-eval benchmark to provide insights into code generation reliability; pick lever if lever offers support for verifying language-to-code generation through actual code execution.
Markdown twin · code-eval alternatives · lever alternatives
GraphCanon updated Oct 7, 2026
Trust & integrity
| Signal | code-eval | lever |
|---|---|---|
| Maintenance | Dormant (1120d since push) As of Oct 6, 2026 · github_public_v1 | Dormant (1189d since push) As of Oct 7, 2026 · github_public_v1 |
| Provenance | Not a fork · Personal account As of Oct 6, 2026 · github_public_v1 | Not a fork · Personal account As of Oct 7, 2026 · github_public_v1 |
| OSV dependency advisories | Published findings As of Jul 11, 2026 · osv@v1 | No published findings from this source as of 2026-07-11 As of Jul 11, 2026 · osv@v1 |
| deps.dev advisories | Not queried deps.dev@v1 | Not queried deps.dev@v1 |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | Not queried openssf-scorecard@v1 | Not queried openssf-scorecard@v1 |
Tagline
- code-eval
- Run evaluation on LLMs using human-eval benchmark.
- lever
- Supports learning to verify language-to-code generation with execution
Stars
- code-eval
- 432
- lever
- 89
Forks
- code-eval
- 36
- lever
- 8
Open issues
- code-eval
- 5
- lever
- 2
Language
- code-eval
- Python
- lever
- Python
Adopt for
- code-eval
- code-eval assesses large language models with the human-eval benchmark to provide insights into code generation reliability.
- lever
- Lever offers support for verifying language-to-code generation through actual code execution.
Persona
- code-eval
- -
- lever
- -
Runtime
- code-eval
- -
- lever
- -
License
- code-eval
- MIT
- lever
- Lever's source code is freely available under an MIT License for modification and distribution in both personal and commercial projects.
Last pushed
- code-eval
- Sep 12, 2023
- lever
- Jul 5, 2023
Categories
- code-eval
- Evaluation & Observability
- lever
- Evaluation & Observability, Model Training
Trust and health
Days since push
- code-eval
- 1120d
- lever
- 1189d
Open issues (now)
- code-eval
- 5
- lever
- 2
Stars delta
- code-eval
- +1 (30d)
- lever
- -1 (30d)
OSV dependency advisories
- code-eval
- Published findings
- lever
- No published findings from this source as of 2026-07-11
Full report
- code-eval
- Trust report
- lever
- Trust report
Shared compatibility
- Python · code-eval: Python runtime · lever: Python runtime
Choose code-eval if…
- Tags unique to code-eval: humaneval, wizardcoder.
- When you need clear comparisons of pass rates for different LLMs using standardized tests
- More GitHub stars (432 vs 89) - visibility, not fit.
When NOT to use code-eval
- If the tool's results do not correlate well with the official published benchmarks due to unknown prompt differences
- For real-time or dynamic evaluations as this repo offers pre-computed static results only
Choose lever if…
- Requirements: All of the pipelines have been tested on Linux machines only, requiring possibly custom `tree-sitter` parsers for other platforms..
- Tags unique to lever: code verification, execution based verification, language-to-code.
- Also covers Model Training.
- When the development team needs to verify accuracy of generated code from language inputs based on execution, and has access to Linux machines to ensure seamless functionality.
When NOT to use lever
- Avoid Lever if developing in an environment other than Linux as it requires the use of tree-sitter parsers, which may not be compatible with your system.
- Do not choose Lever if you seek a tool that does not require setting up a conda environment and installing specific dependencies to operate.
Explore
Sources
Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.
- GitHub stars (abacaj/code-eval) · observed Oct 6, 2026
- GitHub forks (abacaj/code-eval) · observed Oct 6, 2026
- Last push (abacaj/code-eval) · observed Sep 12, 2023
- License file (MIT) · observed Oct 6, 2026
- Decision facts (enrichment) · observed Jul 17, 2026
- Trust scan (lockfile / OSV) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- GitHub stars (niansong1996/lever) · observed Oct 7, 2026
- GitHub forks (niansong1996/lever) · observed Oct 7, 2026
- Last push (niansong1996/lever) · observed Jul 5, 2023
- License file (MIT) · observed Oct 7, 2026
- Decision facts (enrichment) · observed Jul 17, 2026
- Trust scan (lockfile / OSV) · observed Jul 11, 2026
GitHub stars on cards: code-eval 432 · lever 89 (synced Oct 6, 2026).
Common questions
- What is the difference between code-eval and lever?
- code-eval: Run evaluation on LLMs using human-eval benchmark.. lever: Supports learning to verify language-to-code generation with execution. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
- When should I choose code-eval over lever?
- Choose code-eval over lever when Tags unique to code-eval: humaneval, wizardcoder; When you need clear comparisons of pass rates for different LLMs using standardized tests; More GitHub stars (432 vs 89) - visibility, not fit.
- When should I choose lever over code-eval?
- Choose lever over code-eval when Requirements: All of the pipelines have been tested on Linux machines only, requiring possibly custom
tree-sitterparsers for other platforms.; Tags unique to lever: code verification, execution based verification, language-to-code; Also covers Model Training; When the development team needs to verify accuracy of generated code from language inputs based on execution, and has access to Linux machines to ensure seamless functionality. - When should I avoid code-eval?
- If the tool's results do not correlate well with the official published benchmarks due to unknown prompt differences For real-time or dynamic evaluations as this repo offers pre-computed static results only
- When should I avoid lever?
- Avoid Lever if developing in an environment other than Linux as it requires the use of tree-sitter parsers, which may not be compatible with your system. Do not choose Lever if you seek a tool that does not require setting up a conda environment and installing specific dependencies to operate.
- Is code-eval or lever more popular on GitHub?
- code-eval has more GitHub stars (432 vs 89). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
- Are code-eval and lever open source?
- Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (code-eval: MIT, lever: MIT).
- Where can I find alternatives to code-eval or lever?
- GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at code-eval alternatives and lever alternatives (code-eval markdown twin, lever markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
- Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
- Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
- Which is better maintained, code-eval or lever?
- code-eval: Dormant. lever: Dormant. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
- Where are the full trust reports for code-eval and lever?
- GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: code-eval trust report; lever trust report.