Comparison
code-eval vs auto-evaluator
Verdict
Pick code-eval if code-eval assesses large language models with the human-eval benchmark to provide insights into code generation reliability; pick auto-evaluator if auto-evaluator is a Python-based tool designed for evaluating LLM QA chains with the capability to auto-generate question-answer pairs from user-provided documents and evaluate answers using configurations chosen via UI.
Markdown twin · code-eval alternatives · auto-evaluator alternatives
GraphCanon updated 2w
Trust & integrity
| Signal | code-eval | auto-evaluator |
|---|---|---|
| Maintenance | Dormant (1058d since push) As of 2w · github_public_v1 | Dormant (1186d since push) As of 2w · github_public_v1 |
| Provenance | Not a fork · Personal account As of 2w · github_public_v1 | Not a fork · Personal account As of 2w · github_public_v1 |
| OSV dependency advisories | Published findings As of 1mo · osv@v1 | Published findings As of 1mo · osv@v1 |
| deps.dev advisories | Not queried deps.dev@v1 | Not queried deps.dev@v1 |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | Not queried openssf-scorecard@v1 | Not queried openssf-scorecard@v1 |
Tagline
- code-eval
- Run evaluation on LLMs using human-eval benchmark.
- auto-evaluator
- A lightweight evaluation tool for question-answering using Langchain
Stars
- code-eval
- 431
- auto-evaluator
- 1.1k
Forks
- code-eval
- 37
- auto-evaluator
- 92
Open issues
- code-eval
- 5
- auto-evaluator
- 3
Language
- code-eval
- Python
- auto-evaluator
- Python
Adopt for
- code-eval
- code-eval assesses large language models with the human-eval benchmark to provide insights into code generation reliability.
- auto-evaluator
- Auto-evaluator is a Python-based tool designed for evaluating LLM QA chains with the capability to auto-generate question-answer pairs from user-provided documents and evaluate answers using configurations chosen via UI.
Persona
- code-eval
- -
- auto-evaluator
- -
Runtime
- code-eval
- -
- auto-evaluator
- -
License
- code-eval
- MIT
- auto-evaluator
- -
Last pushed
- code-eval
- Sep 12, 2023
- auto-evaluator
- May 10, 2023
Categories
- code-eval
- Evaluation & Observability
- auto-evaluator
- Evaluation & Observability
Trust and health
Days since push
- code-eval
- 1058d
- auto-evaluator
- 1186d
Open issues (now)
- code-eval
- 5
- auto-evaluator
- 3
Full report
- code-eval
- Trust report
- auto-evaluator
- Trust report
Shared compatibility
- Python · code-eval: Python runtime · auto-evaluator: Python runtime
Choose code-eval if…
- Tags unique to code-eval: humaneval, wizardcoder.
- When you need clear comparisons of pass rates for different LLMs using standardized tests
- More recently updated (last pushed Sep 12, 2023).
When NOT to use code-eval
- If the tool's results do not correlate well with the official published benchmarks due to unknown prompt differences
- For real-time or dynamic evaluations as this repo offers pre-computed static results only
Choose auto-evaluator if…
- Tags unique to auto-evaluator: evaluation, gpt-3.5-turbo, langchain, llm.
- Use when you need a lightweight solution for testing question-answering capabilities of Langchain models.
- More GitHub stars (1.1k vs 431) - visibility, not fit.
When NOT to use auto-evaluator
- Avoid using this tool when you do not have access to an OpenAI API key providing access to GPT-4, as it uses that by default for optimal settings.
- If you are looking for a tool that does not require you to input documents for question generation and prefer a more customized prompt approach rather than the auto-generation feature.
Explore
Sources
Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.
- GitHub stars (abacaj/code-eval) · observed Aug 5, 2026
- GitHub forks (abacaj/code-eval) · observed Aug 5, 2026
- Last push (abacaj/code-eval) · observed Sep 12, 2023
- License file (MIT) · observed Aug 5, 2026
- Decision facts (enrichment) · observed Jul 17, 2026
- Trust scan (lockfile / OSV) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- GitHub stars (rlancemartin/auto-evaluator) · observed Aug 8, 2026
- GitHub forks (rlancemartin/auto-evaluator) · observed Aug 8, 2026
- Last push (rlancemartin/auto-evaluator) · observed May 10, 2023
- License file (unknown) · observed Aug 8, 2026
- Decision facts (enrichment) · observed Jul 15, 2026
- Trust scan (lockfile / OSV) · observed Jul 11, 2026
GitHub stars on cards: code-eval 431 · auto-evaluator 1.1k (synced Aug 5, 2026).
Common questions
- What is the difference between code-eval and auto-evaluator?
- code-eval: Run evaluation on LLMs using human-eval benchmark.. auto-evaluator: A lightweight evaluation tool for question-answering using Langchain. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
- When should I choose code-eval over auto-evaluator?
- Choose code-eval over auto-evaluator when Tags unique to code-eval: humaneval, wizardcoder; When you need clear comparisons of pass rates for different LLMs using standardized tests; More recently updated (last pushed Sep 12, 2023).
- When should I choose auto-evaluator over code-eval?
- Choose auto-evaluator over code-eval when Tags unique to auto-evaluator: evaluation, gpt-3.5-turbo, langchain, llm; Use when you need a lightweight solution for testing question-answering capabilities of Langchain models; More GitHub stars (1.1k vs 431) - visibility, not fit.
- When should I avoid code-eval?
- If the tool's results do not correlate well with the official published benchmarks due to unknown prompt differences For real-time or dynamic evaluations as this repo offers pre-computed static results only
- When should I avoid auto-evaluator?
- Avoid using this tool when you do not have access to an OpenAI API key providing access to GPT-4, as it uses that by default for optimal settings. If you are looking for a tool that does not require you to input documents for question generation and prefer a more customized prompt approach rather than the auto-generation feature.
- Is code-eval or auto-evaluator more popular on GitHub?
- auto-evaluator has more GitHub stars (1,105 vs 431). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
- Are code-eval and auto-evaluator open source?
- Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub.
- Where can I find alternatives to code-eval or auto-evaluator?
- GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at code-eval alternatives and auto-evaluator alternatives (code-eval markdown twin, auto-evaluator markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
- Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
- Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
- Which is better maintained, code-eval or auto-evaluator?
- code-eval: Dormant. auto-evaluator: Dormant. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
- Where are the full trust reports for code-eval and auto-evaluator?
- GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: code-eval trust report; auto-evaluator trust report.