Comparison
ECC vs paseo
Verdict
Pick ECC when eCC is primarily JavaScript; paseo is TypeScript; pick paseo when paseo is primarily TypeScript; ECC is JavaScript.
Markdown twin · ECC alternatives · paseo alternatives
GraphCanon updated today
Trust & integrity
| Signal | ECC | paseo |
|---|---|---|
| Maintenance | Very active (2d since push) As of 4d · github_public_v1 | Very active (0d since push) As of today · github_public_v1 |
| Provenance | Not a fork · Personal account As of 4d · github_public_v1 | Not a fork · Organization account As of today · github_public_v1 |
| OSV dependency advisories | No lockfile (source not queried) As of 4d · osv@v1 | No lockfile (source not queried) As of today · osv@v1 |
| deps.dev advisories | Not queried deps.dev@v1 | Not queried deps.dev@v1 |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | Not queried openssf-scorecard@v1 | Not queried openssf-scorecard@v1 |
Tagline
- ECC
- The agent harness performance optimization system for AI agents
- paseo
- Orchestrate multiple coding agents from desktop and mobile
Stars
- ECC
- 228k
- paseo
- 10k
Forks
- ECC
- 35k
- paseo
- 1.0k
Open issues
- ECC
- 93
- paseo
- 843
Language
- ECC
- JavaScript
- paseo
- TypeScript
Adopt for
- ECC
- ECC is a performance optimization system for AI agents built to enhance skills, instincts, memory, security, and development processes.
- paseo
- -
Persona
- ECC
- -
- paseo
- -
Runtime
- ECC
- -
- paseo
- -
License
- ECC
- MIT
- paseo
- Other
Last pushed
- ECC
- Jul 9, 2026
- paseo
- Jul 15, 2026
Categories
- ECC
- AI Agents, Developer Tools
- paseo
- AI Agents, Computer Vision, Developer Tools
Trust and health
Days since push
- ECC
- 2d
- paseo
- 0d
Open issues (now)
- ECC
- 93
- paseo
- 843
Owner type
- ECC
- User
- paseo
- Organization
Full report
- ECC
- Trust report
- paseo
- Trust report
Choose ECC if…
- ECC is primarily JavaScript; paseo is TypeScript.
- License: ECC is MIT, paseo is Other.
- ECC requires JavaScript environment and is open-source, licensed under MIT. Specific setup details are not provided within repository data.
- Pricing: Being open source with an MIT license, ECC itself is free to use, but additional features or support might incur costs outside of the core project..
- Tags unique to ECC: ai-agents, anthropic, claude, llm.
- When you are specifically working with AI agents like Claude Code and Codex that require advanced performance tuning across multiple dimensions such as skills and memory management.
When NOT to use ECC
- For projects focusing solely on traditional software development workflows without AI components, ECC's specialized tools are not necessary.
- In scenarios where you're working with closed-source or proprietary AI systems that do not allow for the same levels of customization as open platforms like those optimized by ECC.
Choose paseo if…
- paseo is primarily TypeScript; ECC is JavaScript.
- License: paseo is Other, ECC is MIT.
- Tags unique to paseo: ade, agents, android, codex.
- Also covers Computer Vision.
When NOT to use paseo
- AI Agents: Don't use an agent loop when a deterministic workflow would do; agents add latency, cost, and non-determinism.
- Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model.
Explore
Sources
Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.
- GitHub stars (affaan-m/ECC) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- GitHub forks (affaan-m/ECC) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- Last push (affaan-m/ECC) · observed Jul 9, 2026
- License file (MIT) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- Decision facts (enrichment) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- Trust scan (lockfile / OSV) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- GitHub stars (getpaseo/paseo) · observed Jul 15, 2026
- GitHub forks (getpaseo/paseo) · observed Jul 15, 2026
- Last push (getpaseo/paseo) · observed Jul 15, 2026
- License file (Other) · observed Jul 15, 2026
- Trust scan (lockfile / OSV) · observed Jul 15, 2026
GitHub stars on cards: ECC 228k · paseo 10k (synced Jul 11, 2026).
Common questions
- What is the difference between ECC and paseo?
- ECC: The agent harness performance optimization system for AI agents. paseo: Orchestrate multiple coding agents from desktop and mobile. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
- When should I choose ECC over paseo?
- Choose ECC over paseo when ECC is primarily JavaScript; paseo is TypeScript; License: ECC is MIT, paseo is Other; ECC requires JavaScript environment and is open-source, licensed under MIT. Specific setup details are not provided within repository data; Pricing: Being open source with an MIT license, ECC itself is free to use, but additional features or support might incur costs outside of the core project.; Tags unique to ECC: ai-agents, anthropic, claude, llm; When you are specifically working with AI agents like Claude Code and Codex that require advanced performance tuning across multiple dimensions such as skills and memory management.
- When should I choose paseo over ECC?
- Choose paseo over ECC when paseo is primarily TypeScript; ECC is JavaScript; License: paseo is Other, ECC is MIT; Tags unique to paseo: ade, agents, android, codex; Also covers Computer Vision.
- When should I avoid ECC?
- For projects focusing solely on traditional software development workflows without AI components, ECC's specialized tools are not necessary. In scenarios where you're working with closed-source or proprietary AI systems that do not allow for the same levels of customization as open platforms like those optimized by ECC.
- When should I avoid paseo?
- AI Agents: Don't use an agent loop when a deterministic workflow would do; agents add latency, cost, and non-determinism. Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model.
- Is ECC or paseo more popular on GitHub?
- ECC has more GitHub stars (228,395 vs 10,434). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
- Are ECC and paseo open source?
- Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (ECC: MIT, paseo: Other).
- Where can I find alternatives to ECC or paseo?
- GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at ECC alternatives and paseo alternatives (ECC markdown twin, paseo markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
- Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
- Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
- Which is better maintained, ECC or paseo?
- ECC: Very active. paseo: Very active. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
- Where are the full trust reports for ECC and paseo?
- GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: ECC trust report; paseo trust report.