Home/Compare/OpenAGI vs browser-use

Comparison

OpenAGI vs browser-use

Verdict

Pick OpenAGI if openAGI is an agent creation package allowing for the development of AI agents that can integrate with the AIOS system. It's recommended to migrate towards Cerebrum, which offers a newer SDK; pick browser-use if browser-use is a Python-based toolset that facilitates web task automation and enhances website interaction accessibility for AI agents using browser automation techniques.

Markdown twin · OpenAGI alternatives · browser-use alternatives

GraphCanon updated today

OpenAGI logo

OpenAGI

agiresearch/OpenAGI

2.3kpushed Nov 28, 2024
vs
browser-use logo

browser-use

browser-use/browser-use

104kpushed Jul 11, 2026

Trust & integrity

SignalOpenAGIbrowser-use
Maintenance
Dormant (589d since push)
As of 1d · github_public_v1
Very active (0d since push)
As of 1d · github_public_v1
Provenance
Not a fork · Organization account
As of 1d · github_public_v1
Not a fork · Organization account
As of 1d · github_public_v1
Security (OSV)
1 low (1 low)
As of 1d · osv@v1
No lockfile
As of 1d · none

Tagline

OpenAGI
Agent creation package for building agents in AIOS
browser-use
Make websites accessible for AI agents. Automate tasks online with ease.

Stars

OpenAGI
2.3k
browser-use
104k

Forks

OpenAGI
209
browser-use
11k

Open issues

OpenAGI
9
browser-use
296

Language

OpenAGI
Python
browser-use
Python

Adopt for

OpenAGI
OpenAGI is an agent creation package allowing for the development of AI agents that can integrate with the AIOS system. It's recommended to migrate towards Cerebrum, which offers a newer SDK.
browser-use
browser-use is a Python-based toolset that facilitates web task automation and enhances website interaction accessibility for AI agents using browser automation techniques.

Persona

OpenAGI
-
browser-use
-

Runtime

OpenAGI
-
browser-use
-

License

OpenAGI
MIT license allows freedom to use for any purpose with attribution.
browser-use
The MIT License provides great flexibility and permissiveness for both open-source and proprietary software projects.

Last pushed

OpenAGI
Nov 28, 2024
browser-use
Jul 11, 2026

Categories

OpenAGI
AI Agents
browser-use
AI Agents, Developer Tools

Trust and health

Maintenance

OpenAGI
Dormant (18%)
browser-use
Very active (96%)

Days since push

OpenAGI
589d
browser-use
0d

Open issues (now)

OpenAGI
9
browser-use
296

Security scan

OpenAGI
1 low (1 low)
browser-use
No lockfile

Full report

browser-use
Trust report

Choose OpenAGI if…

  • OpenAGI is a self-hostable package that requires deployment and management on your own infrastructure.
  • Pricing: Free to use under MIT license; free for non-commercial purposes, commercial projects might require additional agreements or payment plans not specified in the repository..
  • Tags unique to OpenAGI: agents, agiresearch, aios.
  • - **Current Projects**: If you have existing projects built on OpenAGI and they need continued maintenance or minor updates rather than a major overhaul

When NOT to use OpenAGI

  • - **New Projects**: OpenAGI recommends migration to Cerebrum, marking it unsuitable for new projects looking towards future-proof solutions
  • - **Advanced Development Needs**: When requiring enhanced capabilities or features that are only included in the newer framework (Cerebrum), sticking with OpenAGI may limit advancement

Choose browser-use if…

  • Pricing: This tool is provided under the MIT license which means you can use it freely but there are no guarantees or formal support unless included in separate agreements..
  • Requirements: Min 2 GB RAM; Requires Docker; Playwright installation and configuration needed for full functionality..
  • Tags unique to browser-use: ai-agents, ai-tools, browser-automation, llm.
  • Also covers Developer Tools.
  • When you need to automate interactions with websites in a straightforward manner, especially if your use case already leverages Playwright under the hood.

When NOT to use browser-use

  • Avoid using browser-use if your automation workflow requires features that are exclusive to a different framework or library, such as specific functionalities only available in Selenium, as browseruse

Explore

Sources

Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.

GitHub stars on cards: OpenAGI 2.3k · browser-use 104k (synced Jul 11, 2026).

Common questions

What is the difference between OpenAGI and browser-use?
OpenAGI: Agent creation package for building agents in AIOS. browser-use: Make websites accessible for AI agents. Automate tasks online with ease.. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
When should I choose OpenAGI over browser-use?
Choose OpenAGI over browser-use when OpenAGI is a self-hostable package that requires deployment and management on your own infrastructure; Pricing: Free to use under MIT license; free for non-commercial purposes, commercial projects might require additional agreements or payment plans not specified in the repository.; Tags unique to OpenAGI: agents, agiresearch, aios; - **Current Projects**: If you have existing projects built on OpenAGI and they need continued maintenance or minor updates rather than a major overhaul.
When should I choose browser-use over OpenAGI?
Choose browser-use over OpenAGI when Pricing: This tool is provided under the MIT license which means you can use it freely but there are no guarantees or formal support unless included in separate agreements.; Requirements: Min 2 GB RAM; Requires Docker; Playwright installation and configuration needed for full functionality.; Tags unique to browser-use: ai-agents, ai-tools, browser-automation, llm; Also covers Developer Tools; When you need to automate interactions with websites in a straightforward manner, especially if your use case already leverages Playwright under the hood.
When should I avoid OpenAGI?
- **New Projects**: OpenAGI recommends migration to Cerebrum, marking it unsuitable for new projects looking towards future-proof solutions - **Advanced Development Needs**: When requiring enhanced capabilities or features that are only included in the newer framework (Cerebrum), sticking with OpenAGI may limit advancement
When should I avoid browser-use?
Avoid using browser-use if your automation workflow requires features that are exclusive to a different framework or library, such as specific functionalities only available in Selenium, as browseruse
Is OpenAGI or browser-use more popular on GitHub?
browser-use has more GitHub stars (104,191 vs 2,275). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
Are OpenAGI and browser-use open source?
Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (OpenAGI: MIT, browser-use: MIT).
Where can I find alternatives to OpenAGI or browser-use?
GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at OpenAGI alternatives and browser-use alternatives (OpenAGI markdown twin, browser-use markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
Which is better maintained, OpenAGI or browser-use?
OpenAGI: Dormant. browser-use: Very active. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
Where are the full trust reports for OpenAGI and browser-use?
GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: OpenAGI trust report; browser-use trust report.