Comparison
open-code-review vs codecompanion.nvim
Verdict
Pick open-code-review if open-code-review is a hybrid architecture code review tool using deterministic pipelines and an LLM Agent to provide detailed feedback, including specific security rule checks; pick codecompanion.nvim if aI coding plugin for Neovim in Lua with Apache license and support for various LLMs.
Markdown twin · open-code-review alternatives · codecompanion.nvim alternatives
GraphCanon updated Aug 19, 2026
11views this month
Trust & integrity
| Signal | open-code-review | codecompanion.nvim |
|---|---|---|
| Maintenance | Very active (0d since push) As of Aug 19, 2026 · github_public_v1 | Very active (1d since push) As of Aug 13, 2026 · github_public_v1 |
| Provenance | Not a fork · Organization account As of Aug 19, 2026 · github_public_v1 | Not a fork · Personal account As of Aug 13, 2026 · github_public_v1 |
| OSV dependency advisories | No published findings from this source as of 2026-07-11 As of Jul 11, 2026 · osv@v1 | No lockfile (source not queried) As of Jul 15, 2026 · osv@v1 |
| deps.dev advisories | Not queried deps.dev@v1 | Not queried deps.dev@v1 |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | Not queried openssf-scorecard@v1 | Not queried openssf-scorecard@v1 |
Tagline
- open-code-review
- Hybrid architecture code review tool with LLM Agent for precise line-level comments and built-in security rule checks.
- codecompanion.nvim
- :rocket: Getting Started
Stars
- open-code-review
- 21k
- codecompanion.nvim
- 6.8k
Forks
- open-code-review
- 1.5k
- codecompanion.nvim
- 444
Open issues
- open-code-review
- 126
- codecompanion.nvim
- 14
Language
- open-code-review
- Go
- codecompanion.nvim
- Lua
Adopt for
- open-code-review
- open-code-review is a hybrid architecture code review tool using deterministic pipelines and an LLM Agent to provide detailed feedback, including specific security rule checks.
- codecompanion.nvim
- AI coding plugin for Neovim in Lua with Apache license and support for various LLMs.
Persona
- open-code-review
- -
- codecompanion.nvim
- -
Runtime
- open-code-review
- -
- codecompanion.nvim
- -
License
- open-code-review
- Apache-2.0 license, providing a balance between permissive usage and explicit patent grants.
- codecompanion.nvim
- Apache-2.0
Last pushed
- open-code-review
- Aug 19, 2026
- codecompanion.nvim
- Aug 12, 2026
Categories
- open-code-review
- Developer Tools, LLM Frameworks
- codecompanion.nvim
- Developer Tools, LLM Frameworks
Trust and health
Days since push
- open-code-review
- 0d
- codecompanion.nvim
- 1d
Open issues (now)
- open-code-review
- 126
- codecompanion.nvim
- 14
Stars delta
- open-code-review
- +10k (30d)
- codecompanion.nvim
- Unknown
Open issues delta
- open-code-review
- +89 (30d)
- codecompanion.nvim
- Unknown
Owner type
- open-code-review
- Organization
- codecompanion.nvim
- User
OSV dependency advisories
- open-code-review
- No published findings from this source as of 2026-07-11
- codecompanion.nvim
- No lockfile (source not queried)
Full report
- open-code-review
- Trust report
- codecompanion.nvim
- Trust report
Choose open-code-review if…
- open-code-review is primarily Go; codecompanion.nvim is Lua.
- Pricing: The tool is open-source and free..
- Tags unique to open-code-review: agent-skills, code-review-assistant, repository-level-context.
- When leveraging the capabilities of a large language model (LLM) agent for precise line-level commenting and rule enforcement, especially if you are familiar with or prefer Go in your tech stack.
When NOT to use open-code-review
- For development teams looking for a tool that offers real-time suggestions beyond line-level comments since open-code-review focuses on deterministic pipeline assessments and LLM-generated feedback at
- sync events.
- When specific integration with frameworks or languages not supported by this tool is crucial, such as those needing more Python-centric integrations which might not align well with its Go-based core.
Choose codecompanion.nvim if…
- codecompanion.nvim is primarily Lua; open-code-review is Go.
- Tags unique to codecompanion.nvim: agent-client-protocol, ai-coding, anthropic, claude-code.
- codecompanion.nvim ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment.
- When you are a Neovim user seeking AI-driven code completion that integrates smoothly into your editor setup.
When NOT to use codecompanion.nvim
- Avoid if your coding involves non-Lua languages and you do not require or support the specific LLMs handled by this plugin.
- This tool may not be suitable for developers who prefer code companion tools with broader language or LLM compatibility outside Neovim.
Explore
Sources
Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.
- GitHub stars (alibaba/open-code-review) · observed Aug 19, 2026
- GitHub forks (alibaba/open-code-review) · observed Aug 19, 2026
- Last push (alibaba/open-code-review) · observed Aug 19, 2026
- License file (Apache-2.0) · observed Aug 19, 2026
- Decision facts (enrichment) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- Trust scan (lockfile / OSV) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- GitHub stars (olimorris/codecompanion.nvim) · observed Aug 13, 2026
- GitHub forks (olimorris/codecompanion.nvim) · observed Aug 13, 2026
- Last push (olimorris/codecompanion.nvim) · observed Aug 12, 2026
- License file (Apache-2.0) · observed Aug 13, 2026
- Decision facts (enrichment) · observed Jul 17, 2026
- Trust scan (lockfile / OSV) · observed Jul 15, 2026
GitHub stars on cards: open-code-review 21k · codecompanion.nvim 6.8k (synced Aug 19, 2026).
Common questions
- What is the difference between open-code-review and codecompanion.nvim?
- open-code-review: Hybrid architecture code review tool with LLM Agent for precise line-level comments and built-in security rule checks.. codecompanion.nvim: :rocket: Getting Started. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
- When should I choose open-code-review over codecompanion.nvim?
- Choose open-code-review over codecompanion.nvim when open-code-review is primarily Go; codecompanion.nvim is Lua; Pricing: The tool is open-source and free.; Tags unique to open-code-review: agent-skills, code-review-assistant, repository-level-context; When leveraging the capabilities of a large language model (LLM) agent for precise line-level commenting and rule enforcement, especially if you are familiar with or prefer Go in your tech stack.
- When should I choose codecompanion.nvim over open-code-review?
- Choose codecompanion.nvim over open-code-review when codecompanion.nvim is primarily Lua; open-code-review is Go; Tags unique to codecompanion.nvim: agent-client-protocol, ai-coding, anthropic, claude-code; codecompanion.nvim ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment; When you are a Neovim user seeking AI-driven code completion that integrates smoothly into your editor setup.
- When should I avoid open-code-review?
- For development teams looking for a tool that offers real-time suggestions beyond line-level comments since open-code-review focuses on deterministic pipeline assessments and LLM-generated feedback at sync events. When specific integration with frameworks or languages not supported by this tool is crucial, such as those needing more Python-centric integrations which might not align well with its Go-based core.
- When should I avoid codecompanion.nvim?
- Avoid if your coding involves non-Lua languages and you do not require or support the specific LLMs handled by this plugin. This tool may not be suitable for developers who prefer code companion tools with broader language or LLM compatibility outside Neovim.
- Is open-code-review or codecompanion.nvim more popular on GitHub?
- open-code-review has more GitHub stars (20,812 vs 6,792). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
- Are open-code-review and codecompanion.nvim open source?
- Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (open-code-review: Apache-2.0, codecompanion.nvim: Apache-2.0).
- Where can I find alternatives to open-code-review or codecompanion.nvim?
- GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at open-code-review alternatives and codecompanion.nvim alternatives (open-code-review markdown twin, codecompanion.nvim markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
- Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
- Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
- Which is better maintained, open-code-review or codecompanion.nvim?
- open-code-review: Very active. codecompanion.nvim: Very active. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
- Where are the full trust reports for open-code-review and codecompanion.nvim?
- GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: open-code-review trust report; codecompanion.nvim trust report.