Comparison
cceval vs FullStackBench
Verdict
Pick cceval if cceval is designed for assessing cross-file code completion capabilities in multilingual environments across different setups and retrieval methods; pick FullStackBench if fullStackBench is a benchmark tool to evaluate large language models in full-stack coding across 16 languages, using 3K test samples.
Markdown twin · cceval alternatives · FullStackBench alternatives
GraphCanon updated Oct 8, 2026
14views this month
vs
Trust & integrity
| Signal | cceval | FullStackBench |
|---|---|---|
| Maintenance | Dormant (418d since push) As of Oct 8, 2026 · github_public_v1 | Dormant (517d since push) As of Oct 7, 2026 · github_public_v1 |
| Provenance | Not a fork · Organization account As of Oct 8, 2026 · github_public_v1 | Not a fork · Organization account As of Oct 7, 2026 · github_public_v1 |
| OSV dependency advisories | Published findings As of Jul 11, 2026 · osv@v1 | No published findings from this source as of 2026-07-11 As of Jul 11, 2026 · osv@v1 |
| deps.dev advisories | Not queried deps.dev@v1 | Not queried deps.dev@v1 |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | Not queried openssf-scorecard@v1 | Not queried openssf-scorecard@v1 |
Tagline
- cceval
- CrossCodeEval Benchmark for Cross-File Code Completion
- FullStackBench
- Multilingual benchmark for evaluating LLMs in full-stack coding
Stars
- cceval
- 184
- FullStackBench
- 122
Forks
- cceval
- 29
- FullStackBench
- 10
Open issues
- cceval
- 5
- FullStackBench
- 1
Language
- cceval
- Python
- FullStackBench
- Python
Adopt for
- cceval
- cceval is designed for assessing cross-file code completion capabilities in multilingual environments across different setups and retrieval methods.
- FullStackBench
- FullStackBench is a benchmark tool to evaluate large language models in full-stack coding across 16 languages, using 3K test samples.
Persona
- cceval
- -
- FullStackBench
- -
Runtime
- cceval
- -
- FullStackBench
- -
License
- cceval
- Apache-2.0
- FullStackBench
- Apache-2.0
Last pushed
- cceval
- Aug 15, 2025
- FullStackBench
- May 7, 2025
Categories
- cceval
- Evaluation & Observability
- FullStackBench
- Evaluation & Observability
Trust and health
Days since push
- cceval
- 418d
- FullStackBench
- 517d
Open issues (now)
- cceval
- 5
- FullStackBench
- 1
Stars delta
- cceval
- +2 (30d)
- FullStackBench
- +1 (30d)
OSV dependency advisories
- cceval
- Published findings
- FullStackBench
- No published findings from this source as of 2026-07-11
Full report
- cceval
- Trust report
- FullStackBench
- Trust report
Shared compatibility
- Python · cceval: Python runtime · FullStackBench: Python runtime
Choose cceval if…
- Tags unique to cceval: benchmark, code-completion, cross-file, evaluation-tool.
- You need to evaluate the performance of cross-file code completion systems that can handle multiple programming languages simultaneously
- More GitHub stars (184 vs 122) - visibility, not fit.
When NOT to use cceval
- Your evaluation needs are focused solely on single-file or intralingual code completion benchmarks
- You require real-time data access or live updates; cceval provides pre-packaged datasets that need to be manually obtained and uncompressed
Choose FullStackBench if…
- Tags unique to FullStackBench: benchmarks, full stack coding, llm-evaluation.
- When you need to assess LLM performance in full-stack programming tasks covering multiple domains and languages
- Leaner open-issue backlog (1).
When NOT to use FullStackBench
- Avoid if testing scope is limited to a single or few programming languages as FullStackBench covers a wide range of languages
- Not suitable if your focus is solely on theoretical coding challenges instead of practical, full-stack tasks
Explore
Sources
Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.
- GitHub stars (amazon-science/cceval) · observed Oct 8, 2026
- GitHub forks (amazon-science/cceval) · observed Oct 8, 2026
- Last push (amazon-science/cceval) · observed Aug 15, 2025
- License file (Apache-2.0) · observed Oct 8, 2026
- Decision facts (enrichment) · observed Jul 17, 2026
- Trust scan (lockfile / OSV) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- GitHub stars (bytedance/FullStackBench) · observed Oct 7, 2026
- GitHub forks (bytedance/FullStackBench) · observed Oct 7, 2026
- Last push (bytedance/FullStackBench) · observed May 7, 2025
- License file (Apache-2.0) · observed Oct 7, 2026
- Decision facts (enrichment) · observed Jul 17, 2026
- Trust scan (lockfile / OSV) · observed Jul 11, 2026
GitHub stars on cards: cceval 184 · FullStackBench 122 (synced Oct 8, 2026).
Common questions
- What is the difference between cceval and FullStackBench?
- cceval: CrossCodeEval Benchmark for Cross-File Code Completion. FullStackBench: Multilingual benchmark for evaluating LLMs in full-stack coding. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
- When should I choose cceval over FullStackBench?
- Choose cceval over FullStackBench when Tags unique to cceval: benchmark, code-completion, cross-file, evaluation-tool; You need to evaluate the performance of cross-file code completion systems that can handle multiple programming languages simultaneously; More GitHub stars (184 vs 122) - visibility, not fit.
- When should I choose FullStackBench over cceval?
- Choose FullStackBench over cceval when Tags unique to FullStackBench: benchmarks, full stack coding, llm-evaluation; When you need to assess LLM performance in full-stack programming tasks covering multiple domains and languages; Leaner open-issue backlog (1).
- When should I avoid cceval?
- Your evaluation needs are focused solely on single-file or intralingual code completion benchmarks You require real-time data access or live updates; cceval provides pre-packaged datasets that need to be manually obtained and uncompressed
- When should I avoid FullStackBench?
- Avoid if testing scope is limited to a single or few programming languages as FullStackBench covers a wide range of languages Not suitable if your focus is solely on theoretical coding challenges instead of practical, full-stack tasks
- Is cceval or FullStackBench more popular on GitHub?
- cceval has more GitHub stars (184 vs 122). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
- Are cceval and FullStackBench open source?
- Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (cceval: Apache-2.0, FullStackBench: Apache-2.0).
- Where can I find alternatives to cceval or FullStackBench?
- GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at cceval alternatives and FullStackBench alternatives (cceval markdown twin, FullStackBench markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
- Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
- Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
- Which is better maintained, cceval or FullStackBench?
- cceval: Dormant. FullStackBench: Dormant. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
- Where are the full trust reports for cceval and FullStackBench?
- GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: cceval trust report; FullStackBench trust report.