Home/Compare/cceval vs HLCE

Comparison

cceval vs HLCE

Verdict

Pick cceval if cceval is designed for assessing cross-file code completion capabilities in multilingual environments across different setups and retrieval methods; pick HLCE if hLCE offers evaluation scripts to assess code generation using LLMs, specifically for research purposes.

Markdown twin · cceval alternatives · HLCE alternatives

GraphCanon updated 1w

cceval logo

cceval

amazon-science/cceval

182pushed Aug 15, 2025
vs
HLCE logo

HLCE

Humanity-s-Last-Code-Exam/HLCE

96pushed Aug 21, 2025

Trust & integrity

SignalccevalHLCE
Maintenance
Slowing (354d since push)
As of 2w · github_public_v1
Slowing (352d since push)
As of 1w · github_public_v1
Provenance
Not a fork · Organization account
As of 2w · github_public_v1
Not a fork · Organization account
As of 1w · github_public_v1
OSV dependency advisories
Published findings
As of 1mo · osv@v1
Published findings
As of 1mo · osv@v1
deps.dev advisories
Not queried
deps.dev@v1
Not queried
deps.dev@v1
OpenSSF Scorecard
Not queried
openssf-scorecard@v1
Not queried
openssf-scorecard@v1

Tagline

cceval
CrossCodeEval Benchmark for Cross-File Code Completion
HLCE
Source Evaluation scripts for Humanity's Last Code Exam

Stars

cceval
182
HLCE
96

Forks

cceval
28
HLCE
8

Open issues

cceval
5
HLCE
1

Language

cceval
Python
HLCE
Python

Adopt for

cceval
cceval is designed for assessing cross-file code completion capabilities in multilingual environments across different setups and retrieval methods.
HLCE
HLCE offers evaluation scripts to assess code generation using LLMs, specifically for research purposes.

Persona

cceval
-
HLCE
-

Runtime

cceval
-
HLCE
-

License

cceval
Apache-2.0
HLCE
-

Last pushed

cceval
Aug 15, 2025
HLCE
Aug 21, 2025

Categories

cceval
Evaluation & Observability
HLCE
Evaluation & Observability, LLM Frameworks

Trust and health

Days since push

cceval
354d
HLCE
352d

Open issues (now)

cceval
5
HLCE
1

Full report

Choose cceval if…

  • Tags unique to cceval: code-completion, cross-file, evaluation-tool, multilingual.
  • You need to evaluate the performance of cross-file code completion systems that can handle multiple programming languages simultaneously
  • More GitHub stars (182 vs 96) - visibility, not fit.

When NOT to use cceval

  • Your evaluation needs are focused solely on single-file or intralingual code completion benchmarks
  • You require real-time data access or live updates; cceval provides pre-packaged datasets that need to be manually obtained and uncompressed

Choose HLCE if…

  • Tags unique to HLCE: codegen, codellm, llm-evaluation.
  • Also covers LLM Frameworks.
  • When you are researching the capabilities of language models in generating code and need benchmarking tools that focus on this aspect exclusively.

When NOT to use HLCE

  • If you require tools that cater to general-purpose evaluation beyond the scope of LLM code generation in a research context.
  • When proprietary or non-research licenses are necessary, since HLCE does not detail its licensing beyond being for research purposes only.

Explore

Sources

Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.

GitHub stars on cards: cceval 182 · HLCE 96 (synced Aug 5, 2026).

Common questions

What is the difference between cceval and HLCE?
cceval: CrossCodeEval Benchmark for Cross-File Code Completion. HLCE: Source Evaluation scripts for Humanity's Last Code Exam. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
When should I choose cceval over HLCE?
Choose cceval over HLCE when Tags unique to cceval: code-completion, cross-file, evaluation-tool, multilingual; You need to evaluate the performance of cross-file code completion systems that can handle multiple programming languages simultaneously; More GitHub stars (182 vs 96) - visibility, not fit.
When should I choose HLCE over cceval?
Choose HLCE over cceval when Tags unique to HLCE: codegen, codellm, llm-evaluation; Also covers LLM Frameworks; When you are researching the capabilities of language models in generating code and need benchmarking tools that focus on this aspect exclusively.
When should I avoid cceval?
Your evaluation needs are focused solely on single-file or intralingual code completion benchmarks You require real-time data access or live updates; cceval provides pre-packaged datasets that need to be manually obtained and uncompressed
When should I avoid HLCE?
If you require tools that cater to general-purpose evaluation beyond the scope of LLM code generation in a research context. When proprietary or non-research licenses are necessary, since HLCE does not detail its licensing beyond being for research purposes only.
Is cceval or HLCE more popular on GitHub?
cceval has more GitHub stars (182 vs 96). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
Are cceval and HLCE open source?
Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub.
Where can I find alternatives to cceval or HLCE?
GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at cceval alternatives and HLCE alternatives (cceval markdown twin, HLCE markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
Which is better maintained, cceval or HLCE?
cceval: Slowing. HLCE: Slowing. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
Where are the full trust reports for cceval and HLCE?
GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: cceval trust report; HLCE trust report.

Was this helpful?

Anonymous feedback helps us improve pages and translations.