cceval vs human-eval

Common questions

What is the difference between cceval and human-eval?

cceval: CrossCodeEval Benchmark for Cross-File Code Completion. human-eval: Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.

When should I choose cceval over human-eval?

Choose cceval over human-eval when License: cceval is Apache-2.0, human-eval is MIT; Tags unique to cceval: benchmark, code-completion, cross-file, evaluation-tool; You need to evaluate the performance of cross-file code completion systems that can handle multiple programming languages simultaneously.

When should I choose human-eval over cceval?

Choose human-eval over cceval when License: human-eval is MIT, cceval is Apache-2.0; This evaluation framework must be installed and set up in your own environment, ensuring full control over the testing process; Pricing: The software is available under an MIT license for free use, yet advanced features or services beyond its core functionality might incur costs.; Tags unique to human-eval: code evaluation, large language models, python; When you need to evaluate the performance of AI systems that have been trained exclusively on code datasets, as it allows testing via human-created benchmarks relevant only to code-based models.

When should I avoid cceval?

Your evaluation needs are focused solely on single-file or intralingual code completion benchmarks You require real-time data access or live updates; cceval provides pre-packaged datasets that need to be manually obtained and uncompressed

When should I avoid human-eval?

If you are interested in evaluating general natural language processing tasks without coding context, as human-eval is tailored specifically for assessing code-focused AI systems. When the required Python version is below 3.7; this tool mandates at least Python 3.7 to ensure compatibility with its dependencies.

Is cceval or human-eval more popular on GitHub?

human-eval has more GitHub stars (3,331 vs 182). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.

Are cceval and human-eval open source?

Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (cceval: Apache-2.0, human-eval: MIT).

Where can I find alternatives to cceval or human-eval?

GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at cceval alternatives and human-eval alternatives (cceval markdown twin, human-eval markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.

Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?

Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.

Which is better maintained, cceval or human-eval?

cceval: Slowing. human-eval: Dormant. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.

Where are the full trust reports for cceval and human-eval?

GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: cceval trust report; human-eval trust report.