Comparison
cceval vs SWE-bench
Verdict
Pick cceval if cceval is designed for assessing cross-file code completion capabilities in multilingual environments across different setups and retrieval methods; pick SWE-bench if sWE-bench serves as a benchmark for assessing how well language models can tackle real-world software engineering issues from GitHub.
Markdown twin · cceval alternatives · SWE-bench alternatives
GraphCanon updated 2w
vs
Trust & integrity
| Signal | cceval | SWE-bench |
|---|---|---|
| Maintenance | Slowing (354d since push) As of 2w · github_public_v1 | Active (9d since push) As of 2w · github_public_v1 |
| Provenance | Not a fork · Organization account As of 2w · github_public_v1 | Not a fork · Organization account As of 2w · github_public_v1 |
| OSV dependency advisories | Published findings As of 1mo · osv@v1 | No lockfile (source not queried) As of 1mo · osv@v1 |
| deps.dev advisories | Not queried deps.dev@v1 | Not queried deps.dev@v1 |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | Not queried openssf-scorecard@v1 | Not queried openssf-scorecard@v1 |
Tagline
- cceval
- CrossCodeEval Benchmark for Cross-File Code Completion
- SWE-bench
- Benchmark for assessing language models' capability to resolve real-world Github issues
Stars
- cceval
- 182
- SWE-bench
- 5.6k
Forks
- cceval
- 28
- SWE-bench
- 930
Open issues
- cceval
- 5
- SWE-bench
- 131
Language
- cceval
- Python
- SWE-bench
- Python
Adopt for
- cceval
- cceval is designed for assessing cross-file code completion capabilities in multilingual environments across different setups and retrieval methods.
- SWE-bench
- SWE-bench serves as a benchmark for assessing how well language models can tackle real-world software engineering issues from GitHub.
Persona
- cceval
- -
- SWE-bench
- -
Runtime
- cceval
- -
- SWE-bench
- -
License
- cceval
- Apache-2.0
- SWE-bench
- The tool operates under the MIT license, detailed in LICENSE.md.
Last pushed
- cceval
- Aug 15, 2025
- SWE-bench
- Jul 27, 2026
Categories
- cceval
- Evaluation & Observability
- SWE-bench
- Evaluation & Observability
Trust and health
Maintenance
- cceval
- Slowing (36%)
- SWE-bench
- Active (82%)
Days since push
- cceval
- 354d
- SWE-bench
- 9d
Open issues (now)
- cceval
- 5
- SWE-bench
- 131
OSV dependency advisories
- cceval
- Published findings
- SWE-bench
- No lockfile (source not queried)
Full report
- cceval
- Trust report
- SWE-bench
- Trust report
Choose cceval if…
- License: cceval is Apache-2.0, SWE-bench is MIT.
- Tags unique to cceval: code-completion, cross-file, evaluation-tool, multilingual.
- You need to evaluate the performance of cross-file code completion systems that can handle multiple programming languages simultaneously
When NOT to use cceval
- Your evaluation needs are focused solely on single-file or intralingual code completion benchmarks
- You require real-time data access or live updates; cceval provides pre-packaged datasets that need to be manually obtained and uncompressed
Choose SWE-bench if…
- License: SWE-bench is MIT, cceval is Apache-2.0.
- Tags unique to SWE-bench: language-model, software-engineering.
- When you need to evaluate the effectiveness of your language model in resolving practical software engineering challenges found in open-source repositories like GitHub.
When NOT to use SWE-bench
- Do not use SWE-bench if your language model's primary application is outside the context of real-world GitHub issue resolution.
- Avoid using this tool if you are not interested in testing AI systems' capabilities across visual software domains; it's more specialized for that specific area, unlike general-purpose benchmarks.
Explore
Sources
Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.
- GitHub stars (amazon-science/cceval) · observed Aug 5, 2026
- GitHub forks (amazon-science/cceval) · observed Aug 5, 2026
- Last push (amazon-science/cceval) · observed Aug 15, 2025
- License file (Apache-2.0) · observed Aug 5, 2026
- Decision facts (enrichment) · observed Jul 17, 2026
- Trust scan (lockfile / OSV) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- GitHub stars (SWE-bench/SWE-bench) · observed Aug 5, 2026
- GitHub forks (SWE-bench/SWE-bench) · observed Aug 5, 2026
- Last push (SWE-bench/SWE-bench) · observed Jul 27, 2026
- License file (MIT) · observed Aug 5, 2026
- Decision facts (enrichment) · observed Jul 17, 2026
- Trust scan (lockfile / OSV) · observed Jul 11, 2026
GitHub stars on cards: cceval 182 · SWE-bench 5.6k (synced Aug 5, 2026).
Common questions
- What is the difference between cceval and SWE-bench?
- cceval: CrossCodeEval Benchmark for Cross-File Code Completion. SWE-bench: Benchmark for assessing language models' capability to resolve real-world Github issues. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
- When should I choose cceval over SWE-bench?
- Choose cceval over SWE-bench when License: cceval is Apache-2.0, SWE-bench is MIT; Tags unique to cceval: code-completion, cross-file, evaluation-tool, multilingual; You need to evaluate the performance of cross-file code completion systems that can handle multiple programming languages simultaneously.
- When should I choose SWE-bench over cceval?
- Choose SWE-bench over cceval when License: SWE-bench is MIT, cceval is Apache-2.0; Tags unique to SWE-bench: language-model, software-engineering; When you need to evaluate the effectiveness of your language model in resolving practical software engineering challenges found in open-source repositories like GitHub.
- When should I avoid cceval?
- Your evaluation needs are focused solely on single-file or intralingual code completion benchmarks You require real-time data access or live updates; cceval provides pre-packaged datasets that need to be manually obtained and uncompressed
- When should I avoid SWE-bench?
- Do not use SWE-bench if your language model's primary application is outside the context of real-world GitHub issue resolution. Avoid using this tool if you are not interested in testing AI systems' capabilities across visual software domains; it's more specialized for that specific area, unlike general-purpose benchmarks.
- Is cceval or SWE-bench more popular on GitHub?
- SWE-bench has more GitHub stars (5,576 vs 182). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
- Are cceval and SWE-bench open source?
- Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (cceval: Apache-2.0, SWE-bench: MIT).
- Where can I find alternatives to cceval or SWE-bench?
- GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at cceval alternatives and SWE-bench alternatives (cceval markdown twin, SWE-bench markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
- Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
- Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
- Which is better maintained, cceval or SWE-bench?
- cceval: Slowing. SWE-bench: Active. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
- Where are the full trust reports for cceval and SWE-bench?
- GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: cceval trust report; SWE-bench trust report.