Home/Compare/Atomic-Chat vs conduit

Comparison

Atomic-Chat vs conduit

Verdict

Pick Atomic-Chat if atomic-Chat is a local AI app and inference engine for agents that runs open-weight LLMs privately offline; pick conduit if conduit is an open-source mobile application enabling users on iOS and Android to interface with self-hosted AI services via the OpenWebUI API.

Markdown twin · Atomic-Chat alternatives · conduit alternatives

GraphCanon updated Sep 20, 2026

9views this month

Atomic-Chat logo

Atomic-Chat

AtomicBot-ai/Atomic-Chat

1.5kpushed Sep 19, 2026
vs
conduit logo

conduit

cogwheel0/conduit

2.2kpushed Sep 17, 2026

Trust & integrity

SignalAtomic-Chatconduit
Maintenance
Very active (0d since push)
As of Sep 19, 2026 · github_public_v1
Very active (2d since push)
As of Sep 20, 2026 · github_public_v1
Provenance
Not a fork · Organization account
As of Sep 19, 2026 · github_public_v1
Not a fork · Personal account
As of Sep 20, 2026 · github_public_v1
OSV dependency advisories
No lockfile (source not queried)
As of Jul 11, 2026 · osv@v1
No lockfile (source not queried)
As of Jul 15, 2026 · osv@v1
deps.dev advisories
Not queried
deps.dev@v1
Not queried
deps.dev@v1
OpenSSF Scorecard
Not queried
openssf-scorecard@v1
Not queried
openssf-scorecard@v1

Tagline

Atomic-Chat
Local AI app and inference engine for agents
conduit
Mobile client for OpenWebUI

Stars

Atomic-Chat
1.5k
conduit
2.2k

Forks

Atomic-Chat
178
conduit
219

Open issues

Atomic-Chat
55
conduit
71

Language

Atomic-Chat
TypeScript
conduit
Dart

Adopt for

Atomic-Chat
Atomic-Chat is a local AI app and inference engine for agents that runs open-weight LLMs privately offline.
conduit
Conduit is an open-source mobile application enabling users on iOS and Android to interface with self-hosted AI services via the OpenWebUI API.

Persona

Atomic-Chat
-
conduit
-

Runtime

Atomic-Chat
-
conduit
-

License

Atomic-Chat
Other
conduit
GPL-3.0 License

Last pushed

Atomic-Chat
Sep 19, 2026
conduit
Sep 17, 2026

Categories

Atomic-Chat
Developer Tools, Inference & Serving
conduit
Inference & Serving, LLM Frameworks

Trust and health

Days since push

Atomic-Chat
0d
conduit
2d

Open issues (now)

Atomic-Chat
55
conduit
71

Stars delta

Atomic-Chat
+368 (30d)
conduit
+213 (30d)

Open issues delta

Atomic-Chat
+11 (30d)
conduit
+8 (30d)

Owner type

Atomic-Chat
Organization
conduit
User

Full report

Atomic-Chat
Trust report

Choose Atomic-Chat if…

  • Atomic-Chat is primarily TypeScript; conduit is Dart.
  • License: Atomic-Chat is Other, conduit is GPL-3.0.
  • Requirements: Atomic-Chat requires TypeScript for development.; Ensure you have the necessary hardware and setup to run open-weight LLM models locally..
  • Tags unique to Atomic-Chat: ai-agent, local-first, open-source.
  • Also covers Developer Tools.
  • When you need to run large language models (LLMs) locally with full privacy and no internet connectivity required.

When NOT to use Atomic-Chat

  • Avoid Atomic-Chat when you need cloud-based AI services that offer automatic updates and maintenance, as it focuses on local offline deployment.
  • Do not choose this tool if your project does not require deep-seek capabilities or self-hosted solutions but prefers more mainstream LLMs like Qwen.

Choose conduit if…

  • conduit is primarily Dart; Atomic-Chat is TypeScript.
  • License: conduit is GPL-3.0, Atomic-Chat is Other.
  • Requirements: - The application requires a recent Flutter SDK with Dart version 3.9 or newer.; - For building on Android, Java 17 and Android 7.0+ (API level 24) are necessary requirements.; - On iOS, the application supports only devices running iOS 16.0+. Xcode is required for builds..
  • Tags unique to conduit: mobile, ollama, openwebui, selfhosted.
  • Also covers LLM Frameworks.
  • - You are using a self-hosted AI service compatible with OpenWebUI, OpenAI APIs, or Ollama endpoint, and require a mobile interface for it.

When NOT to use conduit

  • - If you aim to use proprietary AI services that do not offer OpenAI-compatible APIs or are not compatible with the endpoints supported by Conduit.
  • - Your development setup does not include Flutter SDK with Dart 3.9 or newer, Java 17 for Android builds, and Xcode or Android Studio.

Explore

Sources

Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.

GitHub stars on cards: Atomic-Chat 1.5k · conduit 2.2k (synced Sep 19, 2026).

Common questions

What is the difference between Atomic-Chat and conduit?
Atomic-Chat: Local AI app and inference engine for agents. conduit: Mobile client for OpenWebUI. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
When should I choose Atomic-Chat over conduit?
Choose Atomic-Chat over conduit when Atomic-Chat is primarily TypeScript; conduit is Dart; License: Atomic-Chat is Other, conduit is GPL-3.0; Requirements: Atomic-Chat requires TypeScript for development.; Ensure you have the necessary hardware and setup to run open-weight LLM models locally.; Tags unique to Atomic-Chat: ai-agent, local-first, open-source; Also covers Developer Tools; When you need to run large language models (LLMs) locally with full privacy and no internet connectivity required.
When should I choose conduit over Atomic-Chat?
Choose conduit over Atomic-Chat when conduit is primarily Dart; Atomic-Chat is TypeScript; License: conduit is GPL-3.0, Atomic-Chat is Other; Requirements: - The application requires a recent Flutter SDK with Dart version 3.9 or newer.; - For building on Android, Java 17 and Android 7.0+ (API level 24) are necessary requirements.; - On iOS, the application supports only devices running iOS 16.0+. Xcode is required for builds.; Tags unique to conduit: mobile, ollama, openwebui, selfhosted; Also covers LLM Frameworks; - You are using a self-hosted AI service compatible with OpenWebUI, OpenAI APIs, or Ollama endpoint, and require a mobile interface for it.
When should I avoid Atomic-Chat?
Avoid Atomic-Chat when you need cloud-based AI services that offer automatic updates and maintenance, as it focuses on local offline deployment. Do not choose this tool if your project does not require deep-seek capabilities or self-hosted solutions but prefers more mainstream LLMs like Qwen.
When should I avoid conduit?
- If you aim to use proprietary AI services that do not offer OpenAI-compatible APIs or are not compatible with the endpoints supported by Conduit. - Your development setup does not include Flutter SDK with Dart 3.9 or newer, Java 17 for Android builds, and Xcode or Android Studio.
Is Atomic-Chat or conduit more popular on GitHub?
conduit has more GitHub stars (2,158 vs 1,526). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
Are Atomic-Chat and conduit open source?
Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (Atomic-Chat: Other, conduit: GPL-3.0).
Where can I find alternatives to Atomic-Chat or conduit?
GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at Atomic-Chat alternatives and conduit alternatives (Atomic-Chat markdown twin, conduit markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
Which is better maintained, Atomic-Chat or conduit?
Atomic-Chat: Very active. conduit: Very active. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
Where are the full trust reports for Atomic-Chat and conduit?
GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: Atomic-Chat trust report; conduit trust report.

Was this helpful?

Anonymous feedback helps us improve pages and translations.