Comparison
automatisch vs flowable-engine
Verdict
Pick automatisch if automatisch serves as an open-source alternative to Zapier for those seeking a community-supported approach with the option to upgrade to enterprise-grade features without leaving the same vendor ecosystem; pick flowable-engine if flowable-engine is a Java-based BPM platform which focuses on being compact and efficient for developers, system admins, and business users.
Markdown twin · automatisch alternatives · flowable-engine alternatives
GraphCanon updated Sep 14, 2026
9views this month
vs
Trust & integrity
| Signal | automatisch | flowable-engine |
|---|---|---|
| Maintenance | Slowing (214d since push) As of Sep 14, 2026 · github_public_v1 | Very active (2d since push) As of Sep 14, 2026 · github_public_v1 |
| Provenance | Not a fork · Organization account As of Sep 14, 2026 · github_public_v1 | Not a fork · Organization account As of Sep 14, 2026 · github_public_v1 |
| OSV dependency advisories | No lockfile (source not queried) As of Jul 15, 2026 · osv@v1 | No lockfile (source not queried) As of Jul 15, 2026 · osv@v1 |
| deps.dev advisories | Not queried deps.dev@v1 | Not queried deps.dev@v1 |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | Not queried openssf-scorecard@v1 | Not queried openssf-scorecard@v1 |
Tagline
- automatisch
- The open source Zapier alternative for building workflow automation without spending time and money
- flowable-engine
- A compact and highly efficient workflow and Business Process Management (BPM) platform
Stars
- automatisch
- 14k
- flowable-engine
- 9.5k
Forks
- automatisch
- 1.1k
- flowable-engine
- 2.9k
Open issues
- automatisch
- 287
- flowable-engine
- 411
Language
- automatisch
- JavaScript
- flowable-engine
- Java
Adopt for
- automatisch
- Automatisch serves as an open-source alternative to Zapier for those seeking a community-supported approach with the option to upgrade to enterprise-grade features without leaving the same vendor ecosystem.
- flowable-engine
- Flowable-engine is a Java-based BPM platform which focuses on being compact and efficient for developers, system admins, and business users.
Persona
- automatisch
- -
- flowable-engine
- -
Runtime
- automatisch
- -
- flowable-engine
- -
License
- automatisch
- Other
- flowable-engine
- Apache-2.0
Last pushed
- automatisch
- Feb 11, 2026
- flowable-engine
- Sep 12, 2026
Categories
- automatisch
- Developer Tools
- flowable-engine
- Developer Tools
Trust and health
Maintenance
- automatisch
- Slowing (36%)
- flowable-engine
- Very active (96%)
Days since push
- automatisch
- 214d
- flowable-engine
- 2d
Open issues (now)
- automatisch
- 287
- flowable-engine
- 411
Stars delta
- automatisch
- +40 (30d)
- flowable-engine
- +84 (30d)
Open issues delta
- automatisch
- +1 (30d)
- flowable-engine
- +10 (30d)
Full report
- automatisch
- Trust report
- flowable-engine
- Trust report
Choose automatisch if…
- automatisch is primarily JavaScript; flowable-engine is Java.
- License: automatisch is Other, flowable-engine is Apache-2.0.
- Tags unique to automatisch: automation, low-code, no-code, open-source.
- automatisch ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment.
- Need self-hosted automation solutions
When NOT to use automatisch
- Require proprietary software features absent in open-source models
- Averse to potentially less stable community-supported platform
Choose flowable-engine if…
- flowable-engine is primarily Java; automatisch is JavaScript.
- License: flowable-engine is Apache-2.0, automatisch is Other.
- Tags unique to flowable-engine: bpmn, java, workflow-engine.
- When your project requires extensive integration with existing Java applications without adding significant overhead.
When NOT to use flowable-engine
- If you need a BPM solution that heavily relies on graphical process design tools, as Flowable-engine may not cater to non-technical users as intuitively as some competitors.
- In scenarios needing extensive support for custom programming languages outside of Java, as this could limit its applicability and efficacy.
Explore
Sources
Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.
- GitHub stars (automatisch/automatisch) · observed Sep 14, 2026
- GitHub forks (automatisch/automatisch) · observed Sep 14, 2026
- Last push (automatisch/automatisch) · observed Feb 11, 2026
- License file (Other) · observed Sep 14, 2026
- Decision facts (enrichment) · observed Jul 16, 2026
- Trust scan (lockfile / OSV) · observed Jul 15, 2026
- GitHub stars (flowable/flowable-engine) · observed Sep 14, 2026
- GitHub forks (flowable/flowable-engine) · observed Sep 14, 2026
- Last push (flowable/flowable-engine) · observed Sep 12, 2026
- License file (Apache-2.0) · observed Sep 14, 2026
- Decision facts (enrichment) · observed Jul 16, 2026
- Trust scan (lockfile / OSV) · observed Jul 15, 2026
GitHub stars on cards: automatisch 14k · flowable-engine 9.5k (synced Sep 14, 2026).
Common questions
- What is the difference between automatisch and flowable-engine?
- automatisch: The open source Zapier alternative for building workflow automation without spending time and money. flowable-engine: A compact and highly efficient workflow and Business Process Management (BPM) platform. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
- When should I choose automatisch over flowable-engine?
- Choose automatisch over flowable-engine when automatisch is primarily JavaScript; flowable-engine is Java; License: automatisch is Other, flowable-engine is Apache-2.0; Tags unique to automatisch: automation, low-code, no-code, open-source; automatisch ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment; Need self-hosted automation solutions.
- When should I choose flowable-engine over automatisch?
- Choose flowable-engine over automatisch when flowable-engine is primarily Java; automatisch is JavaScript; License: flowable-engine is Apache-2.0, automatisch is Other; Tags unique to flowable-engine: bpmn, java, workflow-engine; When your project requires extensive integration with existing Java applications without adding significant overhead.
- When should I avoid automatisch?
- Require proprietary software features absent in open-source models Averse to potentially less stable community-supported platform
- When should I avoid flowable-engine?
- If you need a BPM solution that heavily relies on graphical process design tools, as Flowable-engine may not cater to non-technical users as intuitively as some competitors. In scenarios needing extensive support for custom programming languages outside of Java, as this could limit its applicability and efficacy.
- Is automatisch or flowable-engine more popular on GitHub?
- automatisch has more GitHub stars (13,966 vs 9,535). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
- Are automatisch and flowable-engine open source?
- Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (automatisch: Other, flowable-engine: Apache-2.0).
- Where can I find alternatives to automatisch or flowable-engine?
- GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at automatisch alternatives and flowable-engine alternatives (automatisch markdown twin, flowable-engine markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
- Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
- Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
- Which is better maintained, automatisch or flowable-engine?
- automatisch: Slowing. flowable-engine: Very active. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
- Where are the full trust reports for automatisch and flowable-engine?
- GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: automatisch trust report; flowable-engine trust report.