Home/Compare/awesome-evals vs mteb

Comparison

awesome-evals vs mteb

Verdict

Pick awesome-evals if curated resources for AI agent evaluation with BenchFlow backing its maintenance; pick mteb if mTEB is an evaluator for embedding models across languages and modalities under the Apache-2.0 license.

Markdown twin · awesome-evals alternatives · mteb alternatives

GraphCanon updated Sep 20, 2026

11views this month

awesome-evals logo

awesome-evals

benchflow-ai/awesome-evals

★ 901pushed Sep 15, 2026
vs
mteb logo

mteb

embeddings-benchmark/mteb

★ 3.4kpushed Sep 19, 2026

Trust & integrity

Signalawesome-evalsmteb
Maintenance
Very active (4d since push)
As of Sep 20, 2026 · github_public_v1
Very active (0d since push)
As of Sep 20, 2026 · github_public_v1
Provenance
Not a fork · Organization account
As of Sep 20, 2026 · github_public_v1
Not a fork · Organization account
As of Sep 20, 2026 · github_public_v1
OSV dependency advisories
No lockfile (source not queried)
As of Jul 11, 2026 · osv@v1
No lockfile (source not queried)
As of Jul 11, 2026 · osv@v1
deps.dev advisories
Not queried
deps.dev@v1
Not queried
deps.dev@v1
OpenSSF Scorecard
Not queried
openssf-scorecard@v1
Published findings
As of Sep 27, 2026 · openssf-scorecard@v1

Tagline

awesome-evals
A curated library of resources for building and evaluating AI agents
mteb
State-of-the-art evaluation of embeddings across languages and modalities

Stars

awesome-evals
901
mteb
3.4k

Forks

awesome-evals
104
mteb
704

Open issues

awesome-evals
34
mteb
324

Language

awesome-evals
-
mteb
Python

Adopt for

awesome-evals
Curated resources for AI agent evaluation with BenchFlow backing its maintenance
mteb
MTEB is an evaluator for embedding models across languages and modalities under the Apache-2.0 license.

Persona

awesome-evals
-
mteb
-

Runtime

awesome-evals
-
mteb
-

License

awesome-evals
Other
mteb
Apache-2.0

Last pushed

awesome-evals
Sep 15, 2026
mteb
Sep 19, 2026

Categories

awesome-evals
AI Agents, Evaluation & Observability
mteb
Evaluation & Observability

Trust and health

Days since push

awesome-evals
4d
mteb
0d

Open issues (now)

awesome-evals
34
mteb
324

Stars delta

awesome-evals
+140 (30d)
mteb
+63 (30d)

Open issues delta

awesome-evals
+13 (30d)
mteb
+15 (30d)

OpenSSF Scorecard

awesome-evals
Not queried
mteb
Published findings

Full report

awesome-evals
Trust report

Choose awesome-evals if…

  • License: awesome-evals is Other, mteb is Apache-2.0.
  • Tags unique to awesome-evals: agent-evaluation, ai-agents, awesome-list, benchmarks.
  • Also covers AI Agents.
  • Need diverse resources encompassing papers, blogs, talks, tools, and benchmarks specifically curated for AI agent evaluation

When NOT to use awesome-evals

  • Require real-time interactive support or direct tool integrations not covered by a static resource list
  • Seeking proprietary tools from specific vendors rather than open resources and community content

Choose mteb if…

  • License: mteb is Apache-2.0, awesome-evals is Other.
  • Tags unique to mteb: benchmark, bitext-mining, clustering, embeddings.
  • mteb ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment.
  • You require benchmarking tools specifically designed for state-of-the-art embedding evaluations in low-resource NLP contexts.

When NOT to use mteb

  • Your project exclusively focuses on a single language or modality not covered by MTEB’s broad scope.
  • You need a tool that supports operations beyond evaluation, such as model training or fine-tuning directly within the same system.

Explore

Sources

Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.

GitHub stars on cards: awesome-evals 901 · mteb 3.4k (synced Sep 20, 2026).

Common questions

What is the difference between awesome-evals and mteb?
awesome-evals: A curated library of resources for building and evaluating AI agents. mteb: State-of-the-art evaluation of embeddings across languages and modalities. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
When should I choose awesome-evals over mteb?
Choose awesome-evals over mteb when License: awesome-evals is Other, mteb is Apache-2.0; Tags unique to awesome-evals: agent-evaluation, ai-agents, awesome-list, benchmarks; Also covers AI Agents; Need diverse resources encompassing papers, blogs, talks, tools, and benchmarks specifically curated for AI agent evaluation.
When should I choose mteb over awesome-evals?
Choose mteb over awesome-evals when License: mteb is Apache-2.0, awesome-evals is Other; Tags unique to mteb: benchmark, bitext-mining, clustering, embeddings; mteb ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment; You require benchmarking tools specifically designed for state-of-the-art embedding evaluations in low-resource NLP contexts.
When should I avoid awesome-evals?
Require real-time interactive support or direct tool integrations not covered by a static resource list Seeking proprietary tools from specific vendors rather than open resources and community content
When should I avoid mteb?
Your project exclusively focuses on a single language or modality not covered by MTEB’s broad scope. You need a tool that supports operations beyond evaluation, such as model training or fine-tuning directly within the same system.
Is awesome-evals or mteb more popular on GitHub?
mteb has more GitHub stars (3,427 vs 901). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
Are awesome-evals and mteb open source?
Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (awesome-evals: Other, mteb: Apache-2.0).
Where can I find alternatives to awesome-evals or mteb?
GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at awesome-evals alternatives and mteb alternatives (awesome-evals markdown twin, mteb markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
Which is better maintained, awesome-evals or mteb?
awesome-evals: Very active. mteb: Very active. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
Where are the full trust reports for awesome-evals and mteb?
GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: awesome-evals trust report; mteb trust report.

Was this helpful?

Anonymous feedback helps us improve pages and translations.