Home/Compare/browser-use vs agent-kit

Comparison

browser-use vs agent-kit

Verdict

Pick browser-use when browser-use is primarily Python; agent-kit is JavaScript; pick agent-kit when agent-kit is primarily JavaScript; browser-use is Python.

Markdown twin · browser-use alternatives · agent-kit alternatives

GraphCanon updated today

browser-use logo

browser-use

browser-use/browser-use

104kpushed Jul 11, 2026
vs
agent-kit logo

agent-kit

KeyID-AI/agent-kit

686pushed Mar 13, 2026

Trust & integrity

Signalbrowser-useagent-kit
Maintenance
Very active (0d since push)
As of today · github_public_v1
Slowing (120d since push)
As of today · github_public_v1
Provenance
Not a fork · Organization account
As of today · github_public_v1
Not a fork · Organization account
As of today · github_public_v1
Security (OSV)
No lockfile
As of today · none
No MCP manifest
As of today · mcp_manifest

Tagline

browser-use
Make websites accessible for AI agents. Automate tasks online with ease.
agent-kit
Give Claude/Cursor email powers. 27 MCP tools — inbox, send, reply, contacts, search. Free, no signup.

Stars

browser-use
104k
agent-kit
686

Forks

browser-use
11k
agent-kit
9

Open issues

browser-use
296
agent-kit
1

Language

browser-use
Python
agent-kit
JavaScript

Adopt for

browser-use
browser-use is a Python-based toolset that facilitates web task automation and enhances website interaction accessibility for AI agents using browser automation techniques.
agent-kit
-

Persona

browser-use
-
agent-kit
-

Runtime

browser-use
-
agent-kit
-

License

browser-use
The MIT License provides great flexibility and permissiveness for both open-source and proprietary software projects.
agent-kit
-

Last pushed

browser-use
Jul 11, 2026
agent-kit
Mar 13, 2026

Categories

browser-use
AI Agents, Developer Tools
agent-kit
AI Agents, Developer Tools

Trust and health

Maintenance

browser-use
Very active (96%)
agent-kit
Slowing (36%)

Days since push

browser-use
0d
agent-kit
120d

Open issues (now)

browser-use
296
agent-kit
1

Security scan

browser-use
No lockfile
agent-kit
No MCP manifest

Full report

browser-use
Trust report
agent-kit
Trust report

Choose browser-use if…

  • browser-use is primarily Python; agent-kit is JavaScript.
  • Pricing: This tool is provided under the MIT license which means you can use it freely but there are no guarantees or formal support unless included in separate agreements..
  • Requirements: Min 2 GB RAM; Requires Docker; Playwright installation and configuration needed for full functionality..
  • Tags unique to browser-use: llm, python, browser-automation, playwright.
  • When you need to automate interactions with websites in a straightforward manner, especially if your use case already leverages Playwright under the hood.

When NOT to use browser-use

  • Avoid using browser-use if your automation workflow requires features that are exclusive to a different framework or library, such as specific functionalities only available in Selenium, as browseruse

Choose agent-kit if…

  • agent-kit is primarily JavaScript; browser-use is Python.
  • Tags unique to agent-kit: email, keyid, model-context-protocol, claude.
  • Leaner open-issue backlog (1).

When NOT to use agent-kit

  • Last GitHub push was 121 days ago (slowing maintenance, Mar 13, 2026). Validate activity before betting a new project on agent-kit.
  • AI Agents: Don't use an agent loop when a deterministic workflow would do; agents add latency, cost, and non-determinism.
  • Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model.

Explore

Sources

Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.

GitHub stars on cards: browser-use 104k · agent-kit 686 (synced Jul 11, 2026).

Common questions

What is the difference between browser-use and agent-kit?
browser-use: Make websites accessible for AI agents. Automate tasks online with ease.. agent-kit: Give Claude/Cursor email powers. 27 MCP tools — inbox, send, reply, contacts, search. Free, no signup.. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
When should I choose browser-use over agent-kit?
Choose browser-use over agent-kit when browser-use is primarily Python; agent-kit is JavaScript; Pricing: This tool is provided under the MIT license which means you can use it freely but there are no guarantees or formal support unless included in separate agreements.; Requirements: Min 2 GB RAM; Requires Docker; Playwright installation and configuration needed for full functionality.; Tags unique to browser-use: llm, python, browser-automation, playwright; When you need to automate interactions with websites in a straightforward manner, especially if your use case already leverages Playwright under the hood.
When should I choose agent-kit over browser-use?
Choose agent-kit over browser-use when agent-kit is primarily JavaScript; browser-use is Python; Tags unique to agent-kit: email, keyid, model-context-protocol, claude; Leaner open-issue backlog (1).
When should I avoid browser-use?
Avoid using browser-use if your automation workflow requires features that are exclusive to a different framework or library, such as specific functionalities only available in Selenium, as browseruse
When should I avoid agent-kit?
Last GitHub push was 121 days ago (slowing maintenance, Mar 13, 2026). Validate activity before betting a new project on agent-kit. AI Agents: Don't use an agent loop when a deterministic workflow would do; agents add latency, cost, and non-determinism. Developer Tools: A gateway is overkill when you're pinned to a single provider and model.
Is browser-use or agent-kit more popular on GitHub?
browser-use has more GitHub stars (104,191 vs 686). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
Are browser-use and agent-kit open source?
Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub.
Where can I find alternatives to browser-use or agent-kit?
GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at browser-use alternatives and agent-kit alternatives (browser-use markdown twin, agent-kit markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
Which is better maintained, browser-use or agent-kit?
browser-use: Very active. agent-kit: Slowing. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
Where are the full trust reports for browser-use and agent-kit?
GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: browser-use trust report; agent-kit trust report.