Comparison
browser-use vs LaVague
Verdict
Pick browser-use if browser-use is a Python-based repository for AI agents designed for browser automation using Playwright; pick LaVague if large Action Model (LaVague) framework supports developing AI web agents using customizable Large Language Models (LLMs), offering tracking of token usage for cost estimation purposes.
Markdown twin · browser-use alternatives · LaVague alternatives
GraphCanon updated Sep 20, 2026
16views this month
vs
Trust & integrity
| Signal | browser-use | LaVague |
|---|---|---|
| Maintenance | Very active (2d since push) As of Sep 18, 2026 · github_public_v1 | Dormant (574d since push) As of Aug 18, 2026 · github_public_v1 |
| Provenance | Not a fork · Organization account As of Sep 18, 2026 · github_public_v1 | Not a fork · Organization account As of Aug 18, 2026 · github_public_v1 |
| OSV dependency advisories | No lockfile (source not queried) As of Sep 18, 2026 · osv@v1 | No lockfile (source not queried) As of Jul 11, 2026 · osv@v1 |
| deps.dev advisories | Not queried deps.dev@v1 | Not queried deps.dev@v1 |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | Not queried openssf-scorecard@v1 | Not queried openssf-scorecard@v1 |
Tagline
- browser-use
- Agents that use the browser
- LaVague
- Large Action Model framework to develop AI Web Agents
Stars
- browser-use
- 115k
- LaVague
- 6.4k
Forks
- browser-use
- 13k
- LaVague
- 573
Open issues
- browser-use
- 439
- LaVague
- 104
Language
- browser-use
- Python
- LaVague
- Python
Adopt for
- browser-use
- browser-use is a Python-based repository for AI agents designed for browser automation using Playwright.
- LaVague
- Large Action Model (LaVague) framework supports developing AI web agents using customizable Large Language Models (LLMs), offering tracking of token usage for cost estimation purposes.
Persona
- browser-use
- -
- LaVague
- -
Runtime
- browser-use
- -
- LaVague
- -
License
- browser-use
- MIT
- LaVague
- LaVague's license (Apache-2.0) allows free use in both open and closed-source applications, provided that copyright notices are preserved.
Last pushed
- browser-use
- Sep 15, 2026
- LaVague
- Jan 21, 2025
Categories
- browser-use
- AI Agents, Developer Tools
- LaVague
- AI Agents
Trust and health
Maintenance
- browser-use
- Very active (96%)
- LaVague
- Dormant (18%)
Days since push
- browser-use
- 2d
- LaVague
- 574d
Open issues (now)
- browser-use
- 439
- LaVague
- 104
Stars delta
- browser-use
- +5.7k (30d)
- LaVague
- +6 (30d)
Open issues delta
- browser-use
- +82 (30d)
- LaVague
- 0 (30d)
Full report
- browser-use
- Trust report
- LaVague
- Trust report
Typed relationship
browser-use integrates LaVagueLaVague, which is an open-source framework for developing AI Web Agents capable of executing automated processes on the web, integrates with browser-use because it can utilize browser-use's tools like Playwright to enable its Action Engine to interact effectively with websites.
Choose browser-use if…
- License: browser-use is MIT, LaVague is Apache-2.0.
- LaVague, which is an open-source framework for developing AI Web Agents capable of executing automated processes on the web, integrates with browser-use because it can utilize browser-use's tools like Playwright to enable its Action Engine to interact effectively with websites.
- Tags unique to browser-use: ai-agents, ai-tools, browser-automation, playwright.
- Also covers Developer Tools.
- browser-use ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment.
- When you need to automate browser actions with AI agents and prefer using Playwright for its robust capabilities in handling modern web applications.
When NOT to use browser-use
- If your project requires a different browser automation tool that is not Playwright, as browser-use is specifically tailored for Playwright integration.
- When detailed documentation and integrations provided by browser-use do not align with your project's specific needs or if you prefer a more generalized approach to browser automation.
Choose LaVague if…
- License: LaVague is Apache-2.0, browser-use is MIT.
- Pricing: Free to use with customizable LLMs; actual costs depend on the specific LLM used and operational complexity..
- Requirements: Min 2 GB RAM; Requires Python for development..
- LaVague, which is an open-source framework for developing AI Web Agents capable of executing automated processes on the web, integrates with browser-use because it can utilize browser-use's tools like Playwright to enable its Action Engine to interact effectively with websites.
- Tags unique to LaVague: ai, browser, large-action-model, oss.
- When you need a flexible framework that allows customization of LLMs, particularly if your primary model is OpenAI's `gpt4-o` or similar models.
When NOT to use LaVague
- Avoid using LaVague if you are working on projects that do not involve AI web agent development, as the framework is specifically designed around this use-case.
- Do not opt for LaVague if you require a non-Python environment for your development since the framework is Python-based.
Explore
Sources
Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.
- GitHub stars (browser-use/browser-use) · observed Sep 20, 2026
- GitHub forks (browser-use/browser-use) · observed Sep 20, 2026
- Last push (browser-use/browser-use) · observed Sep 15, 2026
- License file (MIT) · observed Sep 20, 2026
- Decision facts (enrichment) · observed Sep 18, 2026
- Trust scan (lockfile / OSV) · observed Sep 18, 2026
- GitHub stars (lavague-ai/LaVague) · observed Sep 20, 2026
- GitHub forks (lavague-ai/LaVague) · observed Sep 20, 2026
- Last push (lavague-ai/LaVague) · observed Jan 21, 2025
- License file (Apache-2.0) · observed Sep 20, 2026
- Decision facts (enrichment) · observed Jul 12, 2026
- Trust scan (lockfile / OSV) · observed Jul 11, 2026
GitHub stars on cards: browser-use 115k · LaVague 6.4k (synced Sep 20, 2026).
Common questions
- What is the difference between browser-use and LaVague?
- browser-use: Agents that use the browser. LaVague: Large Action Model framework to develop AI Web Agents. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
- When should I choose browser-use over LaVague?
- Choose browser-use over LaVague when License: browser-use is MIT, LaVague is Apache-2.0; LaVague, which is an open-source framework for developing AI Web Agents capable of executing automated processes on the web, integrates with browser-use because it can utilize browser-use's tools like Playwright to enable its Action Engine to interact effectively with websites; Tags unique to browser-use: ai-agents, ai-tools, browser-automation, playwright; Also covers Developer Tools; browser-use ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment; When you need to automate browser actions with AI agents and prefer using Playwright for its robust capabilities in handling modern web applications.
- When should I choose LaVague over browser-use?
- Choose LaVague over browser-use when License: LaVague is Apache-2.0, browser-use is MIT; Pricing: Free to use with customizable LLMs; actual costs depend on the specific LLM used and operational complexity.; Requirements: Min 2 GB RAM; Requires Python for development.; LaVague, which is an open-source framework for developing AI Web Agents capable of executing automated processes on the web, integrates with browser-use because it can utilize browser-use's tools like Playwright to enable its Action Engine to interact effectively with websites; Tags unique to LaVague: ai, browser, large-action-model, oss; When you need a flexible framework that allows customization of LLMs, particularly if your primary model is OpenAI's
gpt4-oor similar models. - When should I avoid browser-use?
- If your project requires a different browser automation tool that is not Playwright, as browser-use is specifically tailored for Playwright integration. When detailed documentation and integrations provided by browser-use do not align with your project's specific needs or if you prefer a more generalized approach to browser automation.
- When should I avoid LaVague?
- Avoid using LaVague if you are working on projects that do not involve AI web agent development, as the framework is specifically designed around this use-case. Do not opt for LaVague if you require a non-Python environment for your development since the framework is Python-based.
- Is browser-use or LaVague more popular on GitHub?
- browser-use has more GitHub stars (115,057 vs 6,386). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
- Are browser-use and LaVague open source?
- Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (browser-use: MIT, LaVague: Apache-2.0).
- Where can I find alternatives to browser-use or LaVague?
- GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at browser-use alternatives and LaVague alternatives (browser-use markdown twin, LaVague markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
- Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
- Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
- Which is better maintained, browser-use or LaVague?
- browser-use: Very active. LaVague: Dormant. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
- Where are the full trust reports for browser-use and LaVague?
- GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: browser-use trust report; LaVague trust report.