Home/Compare/browser-use vs mastra

Comparison

browser-use vs mastra

Verdict

Pick browser-use if browser-use is a Python-based repository for AI agents designed for browser automation using Playwright; pick mastra if mastra is a TypeScript framework for AI-powered applications and agents, offering a dual-license model with enterprise features.

Markdown twin · browser-use alternatives · mastra alternatives

GraphCanon updated Sep 20, 2026

6views this month

browser-use logo

browser-use

browser-use/browser-use

★ 115kpushed Sep 15, 2026
vs
mastra logo

mastra

mastra-ai/mastra

★ 28kpushed Sep 18, 2026

Trust & integrity

Signalbrowser-usemastra
Maintenance
Very active (2d since push)
As of Sep 18, 2026 · github_public_v1
Very active (0d since push)
As of Sep 18, 2026 · github_public_v1
Provenance
Not a fork · Organization account
As of Sep 18, 2026 · github_public_v1
Not a fork · Organization account
As of Sep 18, 2026 · github_public_v1
OSV dependency advisories
No lockfile (source not queried)
As of Sep 18, 2026 · osv@v1
No lockfile (source not queried)
As of Sep 20, 2026 · osv@v1
deps.dev advisories
Not queried
deps.dev@v1
Not queried
deps.dev@v1
OpenSSF Scorecard
Not queried
openssf-scorecard@v1
Not queried
openssf-scorecard@v1

Tagline

browser-use
Agents that use the browser
mastra
Modern TypeScript framework for AI-powered applications and agents

Stars

browser-use
115k
mastra
28k

Forks

browser-use
13k
mastra
2.8k

Open issues

browser-use
439
mastra
520

Language

browser-use
Python
mastra
TypeScript

Adopt for

browser-use
browser-use is a Python-based repository for AI agents designed for browser automation using Playwright.
mastra
Mastra is a TypeScript framework for AI-powered applications and agents, offering a dual-license model with enterprise features.

Persona

browser-use
-
mastra
-

Runtime

browser-use
-
mastra
-

License

browser-use
MIT
mastra
Mastra operates under a dual-license model, with the core framework under Apache License 2.0 and enterprise features under the Mastra Enterprise License.

Last pushed

browser-use
Sep 15, 2026
mastra
Sep 18, 2026

Categories

browser-use
AI Agents, Developer Tools
mastra
AI Agents, Developer Tools

Trust and health

Days since push

browser-use
2d
mastra
0d

Open issues (now)

browser-use
439
mastra
520

Stars delta

browser-use
+5.7k (30d)
mastra
+920 (30d)

Open issues delta

browser-use
+82 (30d)
mastra
+51 (30d)

Full report

browser-use
Trust report

Choose browser-use if…

  • browser-use is primarily Python; mastra is TypeScript.
  • License: browser-use is MIT, mastra is Other.
  • Tags unique to browser-use: ai-agents, ai-tools, browser-automation, playwright.
  • browser-use ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment.
  • When you need to automate browser actions with AI agents and prefer using Playwright for its robust capabilities in handling modern web applications.

When NOT to use browser-use

  • If your project requires a different browser automation tool that is not Playwright, as browser-use is specifically tailored for Playwright integration.
  • When detailed documentation and integrations provided by browser-use do not align with your project's specific needs or if you prefer a more generalized approach to browser automation.

Choose mastra if…

  • mastra is primarily TypeScript; browser-use is Python.
  • License: mastra is Other, browser-use is MIT.
  • Pricing: The core framework is free and open-source under Apache License 2.0, but enterprise features require a valid enterprise license for production use..
  • Requirements: Requires TypeScript and Node.js for development..
  • Tags unique to mastra: agents, ai, chatbots, evals.
  • When you need a TypeScript framework that supports AI functionalities such as chatbots, evaluations, and text-to-speech.

When NOT to use mastra

  • If your project strictly requires an entirely open-source solution without any proprietary enterprise components.
  • When you prefer frameworks that do not differentiate between open-source and enterprise features, as Mastra has distinct enterprise features that require a separate license.

Explore

Sources

Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.

GitHub stars on cards: browser-use 115k · mastra 28k (synced Sep 20, 2026).

Common questions

What is the difference between browser-use and mastra?
browser-use: Agents that use the browser. mastra: Modern TypeScript framework for AI-powered applications and agents. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
When should I choose browser-use over mastra?
Choose browser-use over mastra when browser-use is primarily Python; mastra is TypeScript; License: browser-use is MIT, mastra is Other; Tags unique to browser-use: ai-agents, ai-tools, browser-automation, playwright; browser-use ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment; When you need to automate browser actions with AI agents and prefer using Playwright for its robust capabilities in handling modern web applications.
When should I choose mastra over browser-use?
Choose mastra over browser-use when mastra is primarily TypeScript; browser-use is Python; License: mastra is Other, browser-use is MIT; Pricing: The core framework is free and open-source under Apache License 2.0, but enterprise features require a valid enterprise license for production use.; Requirements: Requires TypeScript and Node.js for development.; Tags unique to mastra: agents, ai, chatbots, evals; When you need a TypeScript framework that supports AI functionalities such as chatbots, evaluations, and text-to-speech.
When should I avoid browser-use?
If your project requires a different browser automation tool that is not Playwright, as browser-use is specifically tailored for Playwright integration. When detailed documentation and integrations provided by browser-use do not align with your project's specific needs or if you prefer a more generalized approach to browser automation.
When should I avoid mastra?
If your project strictly requires an entirely open-source solution without any proprietary enterprise components. When you prefer frameworks that do not differentiate between open-source and enterprise features, as Mastra has distinct enterprise features that require a separate license.
Is browser-use or mastra more popular on GitHub?
browser-use has more GitHub stars (115,057 vs 28,149). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
Are browser-use and mastra open source?
Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (browser-use: MIT, mastra: Other).
Where can I find alternatives to browser-use or mastra?
GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at browser-use alternatives and mastra alternatives (browser-use markdown twin, mastra markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
Which is better maintained, browser-use or mastra?
browser-use: Very active. mastra: Very active. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
Where are the full trust reports for browser-use and mastra?
GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: browser-use trust report; mastra trust report.

Was this helpful?

Anonymous feedback helps us improve pages and translations.