Comparison
audapolis vs whisper-diarization
Verdict
Pick audapolis if audapolis is an open-source editor for spoken-word media that provides automatic transcription and a user-friendly interface, all while keeping data local; pick whisper-diarization if automatic Speech Recognition with Speaker Diarization based on OpenAI Whisper for Python projects.
Markdown twin · audapolis alternatives · whisper-diarization alternatives
GraphCanon updated 3w
vs
Trust & integrity
| Signal | audapolis | whisper-diarization |
|---|---|---|
| Maintenance | Steady (36d since push) As of 3w · github_public_v1 | Slowing (156d since push) As of 3w · github_public_v1 |
| Provenance | Not a fork · Organization account As of 3w · github_public_v1 | Not a fork · Personal account As of 3w · github_public_v1 |
| OSV dependency advisories | No lockfile (source not queried) As of 1mo · osv@v1 | No published findings from this source as of 2026-07-11 As of 1mo · osv@v1 |
| deps.dev advisories | Not queried deps.dev@v1 | Not queried deps.dev@v1 |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | Not queried openssf-scorecard@v1 | Not queried openssf-scorecard@v1 |
Tagline
- audapolis
- An editor for spoken-word media with automatic transcription.
- whisper-diarization
- Automatic Speech Recognition with Speaker Diarization based on OpenAI Whisper
Stars
- audapolis
- 1.9k
- whisper-diarization
- 5.6k
Forks
- audapolis
- 61
- whisper-diarization
- 503
Open issues
- audapolis
- 124
- whisper-diarization
- 41
Language
- audapolis
- TypeScript
- whisper-diarization
- Jupyter Notebook
Adopt for
- audapolis
- Audapolis is an open-source editor for spoken-word media that provides automatic transcription and a user-friendly interface, all while keeping data local.
- whisper-diarization
- Automatic Speech Recognition with Speaker Diarization based on OpenAI Whisper for Python projects
Persona
- audapolis
- -
- whisper-diarization
- -
Runtime
- audapolis
- -
- whisper-diarization
- -
License
- audapolis
- AGPL-3.0
- whisper-diarization
- BSD-2-Clause
Last pushed
- audapolis
- Jun 24, 2026
- whisper-diarization
- Feb 23, 2026
Categories
- audapolis
- Speech & Audio
- whisper-diarization
- Developer Tools, Speech & Audio
Trust and health
Maintenance
- audapolis
- Steady (60%)
- whisper-diarization
- Slowing (36%)
Days since push
- audapolis
- 36d
- whisper-diarization
- 156d
Open issues (now)
- audapolis
- 124
- whisper-diarization
- 41
Owner type
- audapolis
- Organization
- whisper-diarization
- User
OSV dependency advisories
- audapolis
- No lockfile (source not queried)
- whisper-diarization
- No published findings from this source as of 2026-07-11
Full report
- audapolis
- Trust report
- whisper-diarization
- Trust report
Choose audapolis if…
- audapolis is primarily TypeScript; whisper-diarization is Jupyter Notebook.
- License: audapolis is AGPL-3.0, whisper-diarization is BSD-2-Clause.
- Tags unique to audapolis: audio-editing, speech-to-text, transcription, video-editing.
- When you need to edit spoken-word content like podcasts or audiobooks on your local machine without relying on cloud services
When NOT to use audapolis
- If you prefer using cloud-based tools that offer real-time collaboration features
- When looking for specialized advanced mixing or sound engineering capabilities for complex audio productions
Choose whisper-diarization if…
- whisper-diarization is primarily Jupyter Notebook; audapolis is TypeScript.
- License: whisper-diarization is BSD-2-Clause, audapolis is AGPL-3.0.
- Tags unique to whisper-diarization: asr, speaker-diarization, speech-recognition, whisper.
- Also covers Developer Tools.
- You need advanced speech recognition capabilities paired with speaker diarization in your Python project.
When NOT to use whisper-diarization
- If your project is restricted to use only open-source tools under the MIT license, as whisper-diarization uses the BSD-2-Clause license.
- Your environment cannot support Python 3.10 or later or you lack prerequisites such as Cython and FFMPEG installation rights.
Explore
Sources
Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.
- GitHub stars (bugbakery/audapolis) · observed Jul 30, 2026
- GitHub forks (bugbakery/audapolis) · observed Jul 30, 2026
- Last push (bugbakery/audapolis) · observed Jun 24, 2026
- License file (AGPL-3.0) · observed Jul 30, 2026
- Decision facts (enrichment) · observed Jul 17, 2026
- Trust scan (lockfile / OSV) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- GitHub stars (MahmoudAshraf97/whisper-diarization) · observed Jul 30, 2026
- GitHub forks (MahmoudAshraf97/whisper-diarization) · observed Jul 30, 2026
- Last push (MahmoudAshraf97/whisper-diarization) · observed Feb 23, 2026
- License file (BSD-2-Clause) · observed Jul 30, 2026
- Decision facts (enrichment) · observed Jul 17, 2026
- Trust scan (lockfile / OSV) · observed Jul 11, 2026
GitHub stars on cards: audapolis 1.9k · whisper-diarization 5.6k (synced Jul 30, 2026).
Common questions
- What is the difference between audapolis and whisper-diarization?
- audapolis: An editor for spoken-word media with automatic transcription.. whisper-diarization: Automatic Speech Recognition with Speaker Diarization based on OpenAI Whisper. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
- When should I choose audapolis over whisper-diarization?
- Choose audapolis over whisper-diarization when audapolis is primarily TypeScript; whisper-diarization is Jupyter Notebook; License: audapolis is AGPL-3.0, whisper-diarization is BSD-2-Clause; Tags unique to audapolis: audio-editing, speech-to-text, transcription, video-editing; When you need to edit spoken-word content like podcasts or audiobooks on your local machine without relying on cloud services.
- When should I choose whisper-diarization over audapolis?
- Choose whisper-diarization over audapolis when whisper-diarization is primarily Jupyter Notebook; audapolis is TypeScript; License: whisper-diarization is BSD-2-Clause, audapolis is AGPL-3.0; Tags unique to whisper-diarization: asr, speaker-diarization, speech-recognition, whisper; Also covers Developer Tools; You need advanced speech recognition capabilities paired with speaker diarization in your Python project.
- When should I avoid audapolis?
- If you prefer using cloud-based tools that offer real-time collaboration features When looking for specialized advanced mixing or sound engineering capabilities for complex audio productions
- When should I avoid whisper-diarization?
- If your project is restricted to use only open-source tools under the MIT license, as whisper-diarization uses the BSD-2-Clause license. Your environment cannot support Python 3.10 or later or you lack prerequisites such as Cython and FFMPEG installation rights.
- Is audapolis or whisper-diarization more popular on GitHub?
- whisper-diarization has more GitHub stars (5,615 vs 1,879). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
- Are audapolis and whisper-diarization open source?
- Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (audapolis: AGPL-3.0, whisper-diarization: BSD-2-Clause).
- Where can I find alternatives to audapolis or whisper-diarization?
- GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at audapolis alternatives and whisper-diarization alternatives (audapolis markdown twin, whisper-diarization markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
- Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
- Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
- Which is better maintained, audapolis or whisper-diarization?
- audapolis: Steady. whisper-diarization: Slowing. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
- Where are the full trust reports for audapolis and whisper-diarization?
- GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: audapolis trust report; whisper-diarization trust report.