Comparison
audapolis vs whishper
Verdict
Pick audapolis if audapolis is an open-source editor for spoken-word media that provides automatic transcription and a user-friendly interface, all while keeping data local; pick whishper if whishper is an open-source audio transcription and subtitling suite with a web UI that supports both GPU and CPU for local transcription.
Markdown twin · audapolis alternatives · whishper alternatives
GraphCanon updated 3w
vs
Trust & integrity
| Signal | audapolis | whishper |
|---|---|---|
| Maintenance | Steady (36d since push) As of 3w · github_public_v1 | Slowing (348d since push) As of 3w · github_public_v1 |
| Provenance | Not a fork · Organization account As of 3w · github_public_v1 | Not a fork · Personal account As of 3w · github_public_v1 |
| OSV dependency advisories | No lockfile (source not queried) As of 1mo · osv@v1 | No lockfile (source not queried) As of 1mo · osv@v1 |
| deps.dev advisories | Not queried deps.dev@v1 | Not queried deps.dev@v1 |
| OpenSSF Scorecard | Not queried openssf-scorecard@v1 | Not queried openssf-scorecard@v1 |
Tagline
- audapolis
- An editor for spoken-word media with automatic transcription.
- whishper
- Open-source local audio transcription and subtitling suite with web UI
Stars
- audapolis
- 1.9k
- whishper
- 3.0k
Forks
- audapolis
- 61
- whishper
- 179
Open issues
- audapolis
- 124
- whishper
- 108
Language
- audapolis
- TypeScript
- whishper
- Svelte
Adopt for
- audapolis
- Audapolis is an open-source editor for spoken-word media that provides automatic transcription and a user-friendly interface, all while keeping data local.
- whishper
- Whishper is an open-source audio transcription and subtitling suite with a web UI that supports both GPU and CPU for local transcription.
Persona
- audapolis
- -
- whishper
- -
Runtime
- audapolis
- -
- whishper
- -
License
- audapolis
- AGPL-3.0
- whishper
- Whishper uses the AGPL-3.0 license, requiring users who modify and deploy the software in a network service to make their changes available under the same license.
Last pushed
- audapolis
- Jun 24, 2026
- whishper
- Aug 15, 2025
Categories
- audapolis
- Speech & Audio
- whishper
- Developer Tools, Speech & Audio
Trust and health
Maintenance
- audapolis
- Steady (60%)
- whishper
- Slowing (36%)
Days since push
- audapolis
- 36d
- whishper
- 348d
Open issues (now)
- audapolis
- 124
- whishper
- 108
Owner type
- audapolis
- Organization
- whishper
- User
Full report
- audapolis
- Trust report
- whishper
- Trust report
Choose audapolis if…
- audapolis is primarily TypeScript; whishper is Svelte.
- Tags unique to audapolis: audio-editing, video-editing.
- When you need to edit spoken-word content like podcasts or audiobooks on your local machine without relying on cloud services
When NOT to use audapolis
- If you prefer using cloud-based tools that offer real-time collaboration features
- When looking for specialized advanced mixing or sound engineering capabilities for complex audio productions
Choose whishper if…
- whishper is primarily Svelte; audapolis is TypeScript.
- Pricing: Free, open-source solution that does not charge for usage or require payment plans..
- Requirements: Min 4 GB RAM; Requires Docker; Supports both GPU and CPU for processing.; NVIDIA GPU is optional..
- Tags unique to whishper: audio-to-text, golang, speech-recognition, subtitles.
- Also covers Developer Tools.
- whishper ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment.
- When you need to transcribe media files locally without sending data to external servers, ensuring privacy.
When NOT to use whishper
- When real-time transcription accuracy outweighs local processing needs, because while faster on CPU, it may not offer the same level of immediate precision as cloud-based solutions.
- If your project is resource-constrained, especially in terms of development time and effort required for setup since Whishper involves a few manual steps to start using.
- When direct audio input from web browsers is necessary because this feature is pending implementation.
Explore
Sources
Every stat on this page traces to a dated GitHub sync, license file, enrichment field, or trust scan.
- GitHub stars (bugbakery/audapolis) · observed Jul 30, 2026
- GitHub forks (bugbakery/audapolis) · observed Jul 30, 2026
- Last push (bugbakery/audapolis) · observed Jun 24, 2026
- License file (AGPL-3.0) · observed Jul 30, 2026
- Decision facts (enrichment) · observed Jul 17, 2026
- Trust scan (lockfile / OSV) · observed Jul 11, 2026
- GitHub stars (pluja/whishper) · observed Jul 30, 2026
- GitHub forks (pluja/whishper) · observed Jul 30, 2026
- Last push (pluja/whishper) · observed Aug 15, 2025
- License file (AGPL-3.0) · observed Jul 30, 2026
- Decision facts (enrichment) · observed Jul 17, 2026
- Trust scan (lockfile / OSV) · observed Jul 11, 2026
GitHub stars on cards: audapolis 1.9k · whishper 3.0k (synced Jul 30, 2026).
Common questions
- What is the difference between audapolis and whishper?
- audapolis: An editor for spoken-word media with automatic transcription.. whishper: Open-source local audio transcription and subtitling suite with web UI. See the comparison table for live GitHub stats and shared categories.
- When should I choose audapolis over whishper?
- Choose audapolis over whishper when audapolis is primarily TypeScript; whishper is Svelte; Tags unique to audapolis: audio-editing, video-editing; When you need to edit spoken-word content like podcasts or audiobooks on your local machine without relying on cloud services.
- When should I choose whishper over audapolis?
- Choose whishper over audapolis when whishper is primarily Svelte; audapolis is TypeScript; Pricing: Free, open-source solution that does not charge for usage or require payment plans.; Requirements: Min 4 GB RAM; Requires Docker; Supports both GPU and CPU for processing.; NVIDIA GPU is optional.; Tags unique to whishper: audio-to-text, golang, speech-recognition, subtitles; Also covers Developer Tools; whishper ships Docker support for self-hosted deployment; When you need to transcribe media files locally without sending data to external servers, ensuring privacy.
- When should I avoid audapolis?
- If you prefer using cloud-based tools that offer real-time collaboration features When looking for specialized advanced mixing or sound engineering capabilities for complex audio productions
- When should I avoid whishper?
- When real-time transcription accuracy outweighs local processing needs, because while faster on CPU, it may not offer the same level of immediate precision as cloud-based solutions. If your project is resource-constrained, especially in terms of development time and effort required for setup since Whishper involves a few manual steps to start using. When direct audio input from web browsers is necessary because this feature is pending implementation.
- Is audapolis or whishper more popular on GitHub?
- whishper has more GitHub stars (3,048 vs 1,879). Stars measure visibility, not whether either tool fits your constraints.
- Are audapolis and whishper open source?
- Yes - both are open-source projects on GitHub (audapolis: AGPL-3.0, whishper: AGPL-3.0).
- Where can I find alternatives to audapolis or whishper?
- GraphCanon lists graph-backed alternatives at audapolis alternatives and whishper alternatives (audapolis markdown twin, whishper markdown twin), ranked by typed relationship edges rather than popularity votes.
- Is there a machine-readable version of this comparison?
- Yes. The markdown twin at this comparison mirrors this page for agents and LLM crawlers, with the same stats table and FAQ answers.
- Which is better maintained, audapolis or whishper?
- audapolis: Steady. whishper: Slowing. Compare maintenance labels, days since push, and release cadence in the trust section below - stars alone do not measure maintenance.
- Where are the full trust reports for audapolis and whishper?
- GraphCanon publishes per-repo trust reports with dated maintenance, provenance, and scan summaries: audapolis trust report; whishper trust report.